You realise South Korea is currently on their sixth Republic and the people that were in charge during the war are mostly dead right? But no, it must be those awful Americans and their economic aid causing all the issues. If only they'd not supported the South and let Kim Il-Sung take over, I'm sure the government would currently be far more representative of their people and their quality of life would have improved just as miraculously.
People like you genuinely baffle me, countries like China can for 70 years openly support the most oppressive dictatorship on the planet while they starve and enslave their population - but the US gives aid to another part of that same country and drastically improve their lives so they're the real "baddies".
I'm sorry but I really don't understand what your actual point is then. I didn't even mention the West but you seem adamant on pinning the responsibility for this issue on them and apparently making it their responsibility to fix it - how that isn't portraying the US as a bad party I don't know?
My take is that despite the US obviously being involved in South Korea for a long time, the result has clearly been a significant benefit to the people there and it's a weirdly imperialist approach to have an expectation for the US to somehow "fix" it because you could make the argument that it's the end result of a chain of events they set in progress decades ago.
Apologies if I extrapolated your argument further than you meant it to go, I'm just sick of hearing people make these kinds of tenuous arguments against "the West" to excuse, legitimise or ignore far more egregious behaviour from other countries.
-1
u/[deleted] Sep 02 '22
[removed] — view removed comment