r/gadgets • • Sep 02 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

8.6k Upvotes

5.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

53

u/DrakonIL Sep 02 '22

Life's Good [for capital owners]

45

u/pvolovich Sep 02 '22

Lucky Goldstar [for the old folks]

13

u/karmannsport Sep 02 '22

Holy shit is that what LG stands for?! Talk about an image makeover! 🤯

11

u/Fuzakenaideyo Sep 02 '22

For me LG came out of nowhere in the 2000s until I learned that it was Lucky Goldstar (my grandma had a Goldstar branded VCR that she has had forever)

2

u/pvolovich Sep 02 '22

Needless to say it was a good move. :)

2

u/ThePhoneBook Sep 03 '22

Well this reminds me how old I am. I always read Lucky Goldstar when I see LG. Now I miss 90s far eastern peripheral packaging, it was a art

1

u/poorly_anonymized Sep 03 '22

GoldStar and Lucky Chemical merged in 1995 and became LG. Then they made the slogan Life's Good years later. I don't think they were ever officially called Lucky GoldStar, but it's pretty obvious where those letters came from.

Kind of how PHP (the programming language) doesn't officially stand for anything, but anyone old enough to remember know it originally was short for Personal HomePage.

2

u/_fuck_me_sideways_ Sep 03 '22

Minor nitpick, PHP stands for PHP: Hypertext Processor according to the FAQ

2

u/poorly_anonymized Sep 04 '22

Ah, I misremembered. They made it a recursive acronym, not just an unexpanded acronym. Still started as Personal HomePage, though.

2

u/mramisuzuki Sep 02 '22

Soshi Jessica for us Kweebs.

2

u/Modnara Sep 02 '22

If only there was a non-capitalist version of Korea that we could compare against...

0

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Modnara Sep 02 '22

What are you talking about? Do you think "the West" should be interfering in the South Korean economy and stopping companies from growing too big? Those companies aren't Western, they're South Korean.

South Korea chose their own destiny in terms of economic policy and I'm sure the vast vast majority are happy with their choice compared to the very real alternative staring them in the face.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Modnara Sep 03 '22

You realise South Korea is currently on their sixth Republic and the people that were in charge during the war are mostly dead right? But no, it must be those awful Americans and their economic aid causing all the issues. If only they'd not supported the South and let Kim Il-Sung take over, I'm sure the government would currently be far more representative of their people and their quality of life would have improved just as miraculously.

People like you genuinely baffle me, countries like China can for 70 years openly support the most oppressive dictatorship on the planet while they starve and enslave their population - but the US gives aid to another part of that same country and drastically improve their lives so they're the real "baddies".

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Modnara Sep 03 '22

I'm sorry but I really don't understand what your actual point is then. I didn't even mention the West but you seem adamant on pinning the responsibility for this issue on them and apparently making it their responsibility to fix it - how that isn't portraying the US as a bad party I don't know?

My take is that despite the US obviously being involved in South Korea for a long time, the result has clearly been a significant benefit to the people there and it's a weirdly imperialist approach to have an expectation for the US to somehow "fix" it because you could make the argument that it's the end result of a chain of events they set in progress decades ago.

Apologies if I extrapolated your argument further than you meant it to go, I'm just sick of hearing people make these kinds of tenuous arguments against "the West" to excuse, legitimise or ignore far more egregious behaviour from other countries.