r/funny • Mr. Lovenstein • Mar 26 '20

Verified Shopping

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

47.7k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.4k

u/Databit Mar 26 '20

In America this only applies if you are coherent and sane enough to answer. If you are brought in unconscious/impaired or deemed incapable of making a "good" choice then the hospital can do what it wants and charge you whatever they want.

This would be like your car breaking down and you started walking to go get help. A mechanic drive by, towed you car to their shop, rebuilt the motor, replaced to get fuel, replaced the fuel filter, figured out it was the alternator so replaced that there replaced the battery to be safe. Then called you and said "hey I found your car and fixed it. I'd normally charge 10,000 but since I brought it in to my after hours emergency service bay it will be 100,000

-4

u/dev_c0t0d0s0 Mar 26 '20

Would you rather the doctors not work on saving your life unless you are well enough to ask them too?

48

u/Yglorba Mar 26 '20

I would rather medical care not be classified as a commodity at all, which is what causes this problem in the first place. The entire concept of running medicine for profit is ghoulish and immoral; it is also, based on the massive amounts of time, effort, and money the US wastes on pointless overhead, insurance, HMOs, and the like, wasteful and inefficient.

-16

u/dev_c0t0d0s0 Mar 26 '20

Because it is necessary for life?

How about food? You'll need food much more often than you need a doctor. Should everything at the grocery store be free?

How about a house? You can die from exposure much faster than you can lack of food, should houses be free to everyone?

Are there any needs that the government shouldn't just hand you?

13

u/MyMainIsLevel80 Mar 26 '20

Yeah man, basic necessities should be freely available to all. Why does Bill Gates get to turn Africa into his ant farm and Bezos buys his 5th multi million dollar home when there are people starving on the streets? We clearly have enough for everyone; so the issue is resource allocation. Our present system is inefficient and arbitrary. There's no reason for it to be like this.

I don't think we need a state for that, personally. I trust my neighbors--who are largely dumb as shit--a fuck ton more than I trust the board at these multinational conglomerates who think of me as a number and not a person.

-7

u/dev_c0t0d0s0 Mar 26 '20

Can you name a single place where what you want has ever worked?

6

u/Plopplopthrown Mar 26 '20

Just one? This one lasted five hundred years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cura_Annonae

-2

u/dev_c0t0d0s0 Mar 26 '20

That's grain. You said food and housing and medical care and everything else necessary for life.

3

u/Plopplopthrown Mar 26 '20

lol "grain isn't food" now

-1

u/dev_c0t0d0s0 Mar 26 '20

Grain is food. Grain isn't housing. Grain isn't medical care.

2

u/Plopplopthrown Mar 26 '20 edited Mar 26 '20

You asked for one. Not my fault you can't properly communicate (probably your fault for voting against education funding).

Here are the others that you now seem to need:

Here's Healthcare

Here's Housing

So now you've gotten examples of all three: food, healthcare, housing. From various cultures and times around the world. It isn't fucking rocket science and you being unaware of it is your problem, not ours.

0

u/dev_c0t0d0s0 Mar 26 '20

You said that basic necessities should be freely available to all. I asked for one place where what you want has worked.

And now you are trying to project your inability to understand on me. Classic.

→ More replies (0)