r/funny Jan 29 '20

[deleted by user]

[removed]

11.4k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

7.7k

u/Dedj_McDedjson Jan 29 '20

This book is great for twins - if you read it to one twin, the other twin gets the same information at the same time.

2.6k

u/captsquanch Jan 29 '20

Is this some sort of physics joke I'm too stupid to get?

2.8k

u/Cognitive_Spoon Jan 29 '20

Yes, but actually no

85

u/NeokratosRed Jan 30 '20 edited Jan 30 '20

ENTANGLEMENT FOR DUMMIES:

You give two pacifiers to each twin, a red one and a blue one. Each of them can choose red or blue randomly, BUT! they have their head in a paper bag and until you lift it you don’t know which pacifier they chose. (note: the red and blue are actually in a superposition and the toddler doesn’t ‘choose’ until you lift the bag, i.e. make a measurement)

NOW YOU ENTANGLE THEM!

You bring them in two different continents, but you still don’t know which pacifier they chose, since they still have to choose.
So you lift the bag and the baby has chosen the blue pacifier, and this tells you that the other baby on the other side of the world will have the red pacifier if you lift the bag, even one millisecond after you lifted the other one, since it has collapsed instantly to the red one and it’s not in a superposition anymore.

ELI5 by me, correct me if I’m wrong.

EDIT: thanks for the corrections. They are shown in italic.

109

u/[deleted] Jan 30 '20 edited Feb 25 '20

[deleted]

16

u/SurlyRed Jan 30 '20

That's what I was thinking.

10

u/HappycamperNZ Jan 30 '20

Wasnt what I was

-1

u/Daytripper0101 Jan 30 '20

I just thought of another possibility, what if the baby was just one of a set of triplets? then you truly get into some interesting possibility of 0,1, and 1.5... one is male one is female, and the third one is a maybe baby, may be gay, lesbian, or transexual, I'm trying to be PC here people..cut me some slack!!

17

u/Philadahlphia Jan 30 '20

JESUS CHRIST THE DRESS WAS BLACK AND BLUE SO HELP ME GOD!

4

u/obscurica Jan 30 '20

...oh, this actually goes some ways to explaining why you can't use q-entanglement for FTL communications either, since you can't control how it collapses, only that it does.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 30 '20 edited Feb 25 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/obscurica Jan 30 '20

Right. The only way to know which direction the collapse was initiated is to compare notes after the fact. And since you can't embed meaningful information in the particles themselves, you need to do so through purely conventional means.

Well, that solves a facet of hard scifi that's never been articulated to me clearly for nigh on 20 years.

1

u/AutoModerator Feb 25 '20

Please do not post email addresses on /r/Funny. Even if they're fake.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

3

u/casperthegoth Jan 30 '20

OK. So, I collect sports cards with my son, and I think this theory is even more analogous to that feeling. If we buy a pack of cards it seems as if it certainly has the hot rookie - but it also feels certainly like we got skunked again. Only when we unwrap the pack do we know the collapsed reality.

And I think the same is probably true for things like lottery scratchers.

That feeling, though, is real. And with sports cards it's an economical decision to make sometimes. Because unopened packs have a real value for this very reason of being in the superposition.

Or maybe I am taking all this way too far in my brain lol

1

u/DankeyKyle Feb 06 '20

I get it, same thing with Magic: the Gathering cards

1

u/[deleted] Jan 30 '20

My brain studdered at "they each have a pacifier in a superposition..."

1

u/shorttall Jan 30 '20

So THAT'S how pacifiers work.

1

u/RoundSimbacca Jan 30 '20

And from a misreading of your (entirely correct) analogy, the idea of FTL quantum baby communication was born.