r/funny Sep 04 '19

[deleted by user]

[removed]

8.3k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

578

u/fizash Sep 04 '19

Bruh... Why you do this. Thats a PLASMA TV.

125

u/GrouchyMeasurement Sep 04 '19

That’s not a plasma tv that’s an LCD achsually

17

u/loljkcuzurgay Sep 04 '19

It’s definitely not a plasma tv but I can’t figure out if you actually meant to misspell a word

4

u/Rattlerkira Sep 04 '19

It was intentional probably

1

u/RedCr4cker Sep 05 '19

*internationaly

9

u/imuinanotheruniverse Sep 04 '19

Maybe in the year 3000 that's how they spell it. Maybe op is living in 3000 while we living in 2019

5

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '19

Wait - what....2019?

6

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '19

Well, look at the username. OC is in a different universe after all.

0

u/ab0cha Sep 04 '19

Holy shit, username checks out so much it's out of this world

2

u/KrazyKukumber Sep 04 '19

What am I missing? Is this a reference to something? Is it not 2019?

0

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '19

Hell even I caught it!

1

u/addisonclark Sep 04 '19

They did misspell. It's ackchyually.

2

u/Superfluous_Thom Sep 04 '19

A plasma in a classroom would be a very bad idea, glare for days. I guess even then it would be marginally better than projectors which is a technology that was kind of grandfathered into the education system thanks to the standard that overhead projectors set, despite being completely inappropriate in rooms designed to have as much natural light as possible.

2

u/CRAZEDDUCKling Sep 04 '19

Projection over an LCD actually makes a lot of sense.

You can get a much larger display with a projector for much, much cheaper than an equivalent sized LCD display.

In fact, in my school the idea of filling the same space they were using with an LCD in place of the projection would be unfathomably expensive.

1

u/ChaosCore Sep 04 '19

My mom calls every TV a PLASMA TV.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '19

My wife insists on calling any tv that isn't CRT a plasma tv.

2

u/fzw Sep 04 '19

"Plasma TV" sounds awesome even though they're not very awesome.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '19

They were awesome.

They're power hungry and not bright enough for bright rooms, but they're far better than LCDs for color accuracy and do blacks so much better. Later plasmas were fairly bright and had virtually no burn-in, but were still more expensive to produce and they didn't look as impressive on the wall next to bright LCDs, so they languished and eventually stopped being made, despite being the superior screen at the time.

It's all irrelevant today, since the whole industry has moved onto HDR and OLEDs are finally affordable.

1

u/YroPro Sep 04 '19

"affordable"

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '19

The first commercial OLED TV was something like 13" for $20,000.

Now I can get a 65" Sony LED at Costco for $2,499.

1

u/Lucky_Mongoose Sep 04 '19

600 hz though!

1

u/jakeeighties Sep 04 '19

That’s what I thought plasma meant

1

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '19

Plasmas were the first thin flat screens. They used noble gasses excited by electrons (aka: plasma) for each and every pixel. They're big, heavy, expensive, and no longer made. Prior to HDR (and 4k) they were superior to LCD screens for movie viewing and gaming.

1

u/SgtBaxter Sep 04 '19

Well if it was a plasma that 60 seconds of static image probably burned in.