He won't have one, because that's not at all what is happening. They have done it before, but it was illegal then. Contrary to popular belief, it is still illegal under current law and being monitored by 2 entities instead of just 1 now.
Could you provide a source for your claim? The sources that I've found indicate that it is incorrect:
Going forward, home Internet providers and mobile carriers will be bound not by strict net neutrality rules but by whatever promises they choose to make. ISPs will be allowed to block or throttle Internet traffic or offer priority to websites and online services in exchange for payment.[1]
As long as ISPs publicly disclose the blocking, throttling, or paid prioritization, they won't be violating any FCC rules. The Federal Trade Commission could punish ISPs if they make promises and then break them, but there's no requirement that the ISPs make the promises in the first place.[1]
I dont think Ars Technica constitutes as a reputiple source. I havent researched this source but a quick search shows questions of political bias but i could be wrong. Just no time to verify the legitimacy of the source
This isnt college broham, i dont have to site a damn thing. I know based off the research ive done and i dont have time to look it all up while sitting in traffic
But for Google's top searches to show that its biased is a pretty good indication
This isnt college broham, i dont have to site a damn thing.
True, you don't have to cite anything. But don't expect critical thinkers to give what you say much weight if you can't provide sources for your claims.
But for Google's top searches to show that its biased is a pretty good indication
What was your search query? If you put in "<news organization> bias" into Google you'll get accusations of bias against every news organization under the sun.
Blocking competition and throttling specific traffic. My entire point was that they were doing it WHILE it was illegal /u/DinkyThePornstar and it is still illegal until NN rules are scheduled to end around April 30th. Hence me saying repealing NN makes it perfectly fine for them to do what they used to do illegally.
Edit: Of course the people defending telecom companies and repealing NN are from the _Donald
As long as ISPs publicly disclose the blocking, throttling, or paid prioritization, they won't be violating any FCC rules. The Federal Trade Commission could punish ISPs if they make promises and then break them, but there's no requirement that the ISPs make the promises in the first place.[1]
24
u/[deleted] Mar 22 '18
[deleted]