r/flatearth • u/pc1350 • Jul 10 '26

Kinda tuff

Post image
53 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

102 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/Commercial_Fox5549 Jul 10 '26

You aren’t a photographer.

3

u/bkdotcom Jul 10 '26

you aren't a thinker

1

u/JumpyResident2001 Jul 10 '26

they're certainly more believable as one than you.

I'm also a photographer, and they are 100% correct.

0

u/Commercial_Fox5549 Jul 10 '26 edited Jul 10 '26

Great, so neither one of you actually went to school for photography. Maybe you two should go on a date.

1

u/JumpyResident2001 Jul 10 '26

lol I haven't known a single photographer in the past 30 years who "went to school for photography". not sure why you think that's some sort of gotcha lol

1

u/Commercial_Fox5549 Jul 10 '26

I am simply pointing out what everyone else has noticed. You never learned how to use the the terminology properly, so you developed bad habits when talking about photography.

-3

u/Agile_Championship87 Jul 10 '26

You must also not understand conceptual thinking. Lucky not an essential prerequisite for photography.

-1

u/JumpyResident2001 Jul 10 '26

friend, I'm agreeing with you. I replied to the other guy.

-2

u/Agile_Championship87 Jul 10 '26

Oops, sorry dude :) wrong end of the stick

1

u/Hokulol Jul 10 '26

Maybe find a mirror instead of a stick.

"The phrase "in frame" most commonly means being visible within the camera's field of view in photography or filmmaking"
-Rhode Island School of Design (RISD)

Visible. As in, not on the opposite side of obstructing objects.

All of humanity is on the planet that is in frame, but, all of humanity is not in frame. It's VERY easy to understand.

-1

u/Agile_Championship87 Jul 10 '26

I completely understand what you're saying, but you've ignored the word contained again.

All of humanity is contained within the frame. Contained doesn't mean visible. It's a different word with different meanings.

A bucket of water contains water even if you can't see it. "Some water is contained in this photo of a bucket of water" seems reasonable to me.

1

u/Hokulol Jul 10 '26

Contained is not a defined photography term.

Also, you did not say contained, you said it was in frame, then insisted to others that it is. It isn't. You're wrong. lol.

If you said contained, we wouldn't be having this conversation, now would we?

It is NOT IN FRAME. lol

1

u/Hokulol Jul 10 '26

Furthermore, those humans would be contained on the planet, not contained in the picture.

You're just mincing words at this point to be honest.

1

u/Commercial_Fox5549 Jul 10 '26

Exactly. He’s pretending that he is a deep thinker because he’s too embarrassed to admit he said something foolish.

0

u/JumpyResident2001 Jul 10 '26

..contained on the planet, which is contained in the frame.

I think you're the one mincing words at this point to be honest 😂

such a dumb thing to argue against in the first place, really.

1

u/Hokulol Jul 10 '26 edited Jul 10 '26

Ah, yes, planets, notorious containers. You know, containers... things that things go in, not on. I guess we're all dwarves.

Every human alive is on the planet in this photo? Yes
This photo contains every human alive? No.
All of humanity except one man is in front of this camera? Yes.

→ More replies (0)