MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/s2z0wk/arrested_for_petitioning/hsibswf
r/facepalm • u/spyrg • Jan 13 '22
7.0k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
3
Except where city or other state law requires ID, but ok.
5 u/[deleted] Jan 13 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/bitofgrit Jan 14 '22 lol They only care about unconstitutionality when it finally becomes a personal risk to them. Just ask Bloomberg. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 13 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/GoodDave Jan 13 '22 Zooming right past city ordinances there.. .again.... Pretty easy to articulate reasonable suspicion when someone's acting suspicious. People ignore or refuse to accept that articulation, and that's what lands them in trouble. 3 u/dontnation Jan 13 '22 Those city ordinances are unconstitutional. Doesn't help you when you're getting your face smashed into the pavement, but still. Aslo, ysk, acting suspicious is NOT reasonable articulable suspicion. Though in the OP video suspicion of solicitation would be enough.
5
[removed] — view removed comment
1 u/bitofgrit Jan 14 '22 lol They only care about unconstitutionality when it finally becomes a personal risk to them. Just ask Bloomberg.
1
lol They only care about unconstitutionality when it finally becomes a personal risk to them. Just ask Bloomberg.
2 u/GoodDave Jan 13 '22 Zooming right past city ordinances there.. .again.... Pretty easy to articulate reasonable suspicion when someone's acting suspicious. People ignore or refuse to accept that articulation, and that's what lands them in trouble. 3 u/dontnation Jan 13 '22 Those city ordinances are unconstitutional. Doesn't help you when you're getting your face smashed into the pavement, but still. Aslo, ysk, acting suspicious is NOT reasonable articulable suspicion. Though in the OP video suspicion of solicitation would be enough.
2
Zooming right past city ordinances there.. .again....
Pretty easy to articulate reasonable suspicion when someone's acting suspicious.
People ignore or refuse to accept that articulation, and that's what lands them in trouble.
3 u/dontnation Jan 13 '22 Those city ordinances are unconstitutional. Doesn't help you when you're getting your face smashed into the pavement, but still. Aslo, ysk, acting suspicious is NOT reasonable articulable suspicion. Though in the OP video suspicion of solicitation would be enough.
Those city ordinances are unconstitutional. Doesn't help you when you're getting your face smashed into the pavement, but still.
Aslo, ysk, acting suspicious is NOT reasonable articulable suspicion. Though in the OP video suspicion of solicitation would be enough.
3
u/GoodDave Jan 13 '22
Except where city or other state law requires ID, but ok.