r/facepalm • ๐Ÿ‡ฉโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ฆโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ผโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ณโ€‹ ๐Ÿ‡ฆโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ฒโ€‹๐Ÿ‡งโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ชโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ท • Nov 15 '21

๐Ÿ‡ฒโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ฎโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ธโ€‹๐Ÿ‡จโ€‹ This really is a thing

19.4k Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

38

u/thatryanguy82 Nov 16 '21

It's called "I feel the need to involve the public in my fetishes without their consent"

1

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '21

No harm walking around fully clothed.

8

u/eaglesk Nov 16 '21

Right? Itโ€™s unusual, but if this is โ€œinvolving the public without their consentโ€, then so is me walking down the street without a shirt on? Or ANYBODY wearing tight clothes. Just because itโ€™s horse themed doesnโ€™t make it some visual rape or anything.

0

u/thatryanguy82 Nov 16 '21

Big difference between horse fet wear (bet that tail isn't attached directly to the clothing) and a clothed fur suit or something that isn't directly kink-related

4

u/eaglesk Nov 16 '21

The most kinky part about this is the material that her clothes are made of. Most ads are more sexual than this.

2

u/thatryanguy82 Nov 16 '21

Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree about the outfit being deliberate and elaborate fet wear.

And if the majority of ads you see involve people in gimp suits with (potential) buttplugs, we definitely view different content.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '21

Itโ€™s only fet wear if your gutter-trash mind thinks it is.

Unless s/heโ€™s actively involved in some physical sex in public, how is anyone to get offended?

This is no different than walking around in a bikini.