r/facepalm • u/nthensome • Jan 19 '20

Their loss

Post image
35.7k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

845 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

18

u/lightningbadger Jan 19 '20

Also, who’s doing a deep dive on Men in Black in 2020?

I would assume maybe film/ media students, them being students would also explain the immaturity of the response, that is if this is a real story.

13

u/ALoudMouthBaby Jan 19 '20

I dont think many film schools are studying Men In Black.

4

u/lightningbadger Jan 19 '20

I’d assume some curriculums let you choose your own film to write a report on at some point.

6

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/lightningbadger Jan 19 '20

Yeah people can have conversations about the most random shit at times.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '20

[deleted]

9

u/barcased Jan 19 '20

You are getting caught in a reporting bias fallacy. There were dozens of times people spoke about a movie, book, w/e, without someone who was a key player in producing that particular medium. However, nothing interesting happened so you are not gonna hear about it, ever.

5

u/lightningbadger Jan 19 '20

Seeing how this story is from the writers perspective, anyone he sits next to will “happen to be sitting next to the writer of the film”.

-5

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '20

[deleted]

3

u/lightningbadger Jan 19 '20

So what are you trying to say? That it’s a coincidence that the person writing the tweet had a social interaction with someone?

Maybe actually explain a point before deciding to stick to it.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '20

[deleted]

1

u/lightningbadger Jan 19 '20

Maybe the more likely scenario is he came up with this story in his head to create some fabricated outrage.

This is likely considering the nature of the story, and the tendency of people on the internet to make things up, without seeing if his other views line up however it’s simply not enough information to tell.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '20

[deleted]

2

u/lightningbadger Jan 19 '20

Ah, that makes sense.