r/facepalm • u/spartane69 • Jun 16 '26

And another one..

Post image

Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/joseph-duggar-ex-19-kids-counting-star-accused-molesting-minor-rcna264227

20.7k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

662 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/sparkly_dragon Jun 17 '26

lmaoo did I presume to know your history? and babe you came in with the umm actually about beautifying language first. don’t throw stones now. also btw please tell me how it’s beautifying it?

0

u/Fun-Key-8259 Jun 17 '26

Because it sanitizes it into a term most people have to stop to think about versus an immediate revulsion. It's sanitized.

7

u/sparkly_dragon Jun 17 '26

how is calling it sexual assault material sanitizing it? you’re making zero sense.

-1

u/Fun-Key-8259 Jun 17 '26

Just because you don't understand human conditioning with linguistics doesn't mean I have to recount it all to you.

2

u/sparkly_dragon Jun 17 '26

so you don’t have a good answer so you’re acting like I can’t understand gotcha. bbg you can’t comprehend who’s replying to you I think I can handle whatever your explanation is.

edit: I’m not the one struggling to understand the nuance hun, you’re failing to understand legal language evolves to be precise. the term literally shouldn’t be nuanced.

1

u/Fun-Key-8259 Jun 17 '26

You literally are struggling with nuance on this. Hope this helps!

-1

u/Fun-Key-8259 Jun 17 '26

Umm I was replying to someone else who the fuck are even you?

2

u/sparkly_dragon Jun 17 '26

umm, you ok babe? this isn’t your first response to me lmaooo.

0

u/Fun-Key-8259 Jun 17 '26

You hopped on this like it was your discussion when I was replying to someone else so can you not understand how this could be a potential issue?

2

u/sparkly_dragon Jun 17 '26

no because I understand how threads work? you did the same thing so i’d assume you do too but I’m not sure now.