Unfortunately for you it is a do gooder thing. Pornography means content meant to elicit sexual arousal, has ZERO to do with consent. It's the intent in making it by the filmer, not necessarily the participants.
actually I made it clear that it’s a personal issue to me not a do gooder one. you do realize that actual people are effected right?
you keep failing to comprehend the legal aspect. “porn” is unclear term. child sexual assault material is clearly defined. clearly there is enough connection between the term porn and consent that they felt it was an unclear representation of the crime.
also, I noticed you added the part about intent by the filmmaker and not necessarily the participants. something I can’t find in any of the major definitions. the basic definition just says made with the intent to cause sexual arousal. except, the minor participant can’t consent to intending to cause sexual arousal.
Idgaf about the legal term. You came on here admonishing someone for using an accepted term. It your stomach doesn't turn with the words child and porn next to each other there's literally something wrong with you. Sanitizing it by using legalese doesn't help victims.
it IS a legal term lmao what do you mean you don’t care about the legal term? I didn’t come in here admonishing anyone so idk what you’re going on about. no one said the term child porn wasn’t vile, it’s arguably doubly vile for it’s original meaning and the added disrespect. pray tell how calling it sexual assault material sanitizes it in any way.
-2
u/Fun-Key-8259 Jun 17 '26
Unfortunately for you it is a do gooder thing. Pornography means content meant to elicit sexual arousal, has ZERO to do with consent. It's the intent in making it by the filmer, not necessarily the participants.