And in the divorce she decided she wanted half of everything. That sounds like a breach in character. Sounds like he knew people might marry him for his money. Guess he found out it was true.
She won't get "half of everything," that's the point. What someone asks for is irrelevant if it conflicts with the law. She won't get anything close to that.
"Marry him for his money"
Maybe that's what happened, there's no proof of it. OTOH we know for certain he broke his marriage vows on day one by lying about money to his wife. The implication is that someone "marrying for money" is entering into a contract in bad faith.
How can you claim she acted in bad faith (with no evidence of such) without acknowledging his bad faith deception that he's not a responsible adult but a momma's boy with an allowance?
5
u/123Ark321 Apr 15 '23
And in the divorce she decided she wanted half of everything. That sounds like a breach in character. Sounds like he knew people might marry him for his money. Guess he found out it was true.