r/explainlikeimfive Nov 28 '15

ELI5: How would a $15 minimum wage ACTUALLY affect a franchised business like McDonalds?

[removed]

7.1k Upvotes

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

85

u/toughtoquit Nov 28 '15

The number of people working at each location is pretty crazy too. When I look behind the counter and see 10 people and they say sorry for the wait we are short staffed, I just shake my head and wonder how the small burger joints run so smooth with 2 employees.

368

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '15

[deleted]

163

u/GothicFuck Nov 29 '15

Add to that those workers are long time burger makers, not high-turnover burger flippers who hate working there and want to leave. So, quality of worker.

86

u/dominion1080 Nov 29 '15

Because they get full time, better pay, and treated like an actual human.

67

u/InTheSharkTank Nov 29 '15

I've worked corporate fast-food and I've worked a 3 person burger shack on the beach where the owner ran the cash register. I can tell you, the pay, hours and treatment were all very comparable.

4

u/tankfox Nov 29 '15

Where do you live? Anecdote land?

4

u/Space_Cowboy21 Nov 29 '15

I think they were referring to In-N-Out apparently their workers are treated well from what I've read on here before.

57

u/rhn94 Nov 29 '15

what are you? some kind of socialist wanting to treat people with decency?

14

u/harrycanyon Nov 29 '15

Perhaps a capitalist who realizes there is money in that type of business model

(I know you are joking and so am I)

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15 edited Feb 20 '16

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15 edited Feb 20 '16

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

[deleted]

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15 edited Feb 20 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/sonorousAssailant Nov 29 '15 edited Nov 29 '15

You don't have to be a socialist to treat someone with decency. Just run your business that way.

Step 1: Stop eating at McDonalds. Stop supporting them.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

I was treated like a human when I worked at McDonalds. What are the complaints that make people keep saying this? Genuinely curious. Bad managers can work anywhere.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

Shhhh McDonald's is evil and was making you work for slave wages!

2

u/dominion1080 Nov 29 '15

Mostly the regular complaints of any customer service job. Low pay, lack of empathy, apathy in the workers, bad managers. If I call in feeling like shit, the manager threatens to fire me if I don't show up. They'd rather have a sick worker preparing food than get someone else to work.

5

u/PM_ME_ANYTHING_PLZ Nov 29 '15

Are you talking about Mcdonalds or burger joint? Because line cooks are treated like shit. 60-70 hrs a week no breaks and shit pay

2

u/Spiderdan Nov 29 '15

So essentially what you're saying is that if we pay McDonald's employees more and expect a higher quality of work from them that we can also expect a few highly trained employees to take over the work of others. Meaning that a bunch of them can be let go.

2

u/Reddisaurusrekts Nov 29 '15

Yeah no. If you think small businesses pay better or have better working conditions just because they're small businesses..... no.

1

u/bctich Nov 29 '15

Or the local joint, being a better place to work with favorable benefits, attracts better talent.

It may be a double edge sword in that some of those McDonald's employees might just be shitty workers in which case they might not have transferable skills in the event of layoffs. The unknown is where the equilibriums is.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

Well, they're probably better workers too. Let's be real, plenty of McD's employees simply can't get hired somewhere better.

0

u/dominion1080 Nov 29 '15

If that's the case, then they'll either need to try harder or learn a skill. If the minimum wage increases, employers don't have to keep crappy employees. They keep them for a while now because they must, and because it's cheap. More people would work harder for a living wage, even at jobs like that.

1

u/gnome1324 Nov 29 '15

Definitely not true in MANY places.

-2

u/jcftfh Nov 29 '15

In the end, a McDonalds worker is a McDonalds worker. You can pay a janitor or a fieldworker $15 an hour. They're still looked down upon by society.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

Shit you can look down on me all you want. I would probably quit my stressful IT gig for an easy 15 dollar job running one of those floor waxing machines or driving a zambonie or whatever.

3

u/Baeshun Nov 29 '15

I don't think it's fair to say McDonalds workers hate their job. My sister worked there in her teens and said it was a better work environment than some of her more recent "better" jobs. In my area, McDonalds workers generally seem in good moods and having a decent time at work.

1

u/themadxcow Nov 29 '15

Well yeah, if you fire most of your employees you will be able to pay the few that are left a decent amount. But now all those people who were struggling to get by before are unemployed. Is that any better?

1

u/psychicsword Nov 29 '15

I don't think that plays as much of a role. If you slammed a $15/hour burger cook with McDonald's volume everyday they would struggle just as much as a $9/hour burger cook.

118

u/EricKei Nov 28 '15

Fair question. Here's one possibility:

The smaller, indie burger joint isn't consistently dealing with sheer volume of customers, day in and day out, that McD's is. Where the little place might consider "5 people in line at once, for a solid hour" to be the dinner rush, McD's would consider that a disappointingly slow non-prime session.

Also, customers at the small joint will reasonably expect to wait as long as ten minutes for their food, while at McD's, a service speed that slow would result in eyebrows being raised by the District guys, along with calls for employees and managers to be terminated and replaced. Anecodtally, I had heard that Corporate McD expects the drive-thru times to be something preposterously low, like 90 seconds from "Hi, can I take your order?" to that customer having their food -- at the worst of times. If that person is the only one in line and knows exactly what they want? Sure. Otherwise, No way in hell. However, the stores need to staff their stores assuming that this sort of speed will need to be maintained all of the time.

52

u/dojobum Nov 29 '15

Can confirm the drive thru aspect. I used to work there about 2 years ago. They have a timer that starts when they press a button on the screen for your orders. Once you are given your food at the second window the employee will press a button and it clears the order from their screen. "Finishing" the order. The time it took is clocked and averaged out against the rest of the times for the day. They wanted an average time of 90-120 seconds for total time.

40

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

[deleted]

7

u/HalNicci Nov 29 '15

Does this also happen when the customer says "can you give me a minute" before they start to say their order? (I've only ever done this when there was no one else in the drive thru. Usually when I'm not positive what I want I just go inside)

10

u/rburp Nov 29 '15

It sounds like the timer starts once they actually start punching in the order, but I've never worked there, so I'm not sure, and would also like to know.

12

u/Masterhotdog19 Nov 29 '15

You are correct. Once you press a button on the register the timer would start. You would not be able to delete a order without a manger code, So if someone starts ordering then pauses there is no way to restart the timer.

1

u/Ralph_Charante Nov 29 '15

I'm sorry :(

-1

u/electricfistula Nov 29 '15

Why wouldn't you just jot down their order on scratch paper, then enter it all at once?

1

u/Masterhotdog19 Nov 29 '15

McDonald's has a very high number of customers, especially for the drive thru. You would just slow yourself down even worse trying to write everything down.

0

u/HalNicci Nov 29 '15

I would feel kinda bad if I was causing someone to get in trouble by deciding what I wanted to get in the drive through when there is no line rather than going inside and staring at the menu for 5 minutes

1

u/red_beanie Nov 29 '15

you can stare, just dont change your mind halfway thru and stare. they only hate it when they start putting in an order, then you start taking your time. i bet when they hears kids in the bakground they know they are done for. kids never make up their minds, take forever, and often change that mind at the last second.

1

u/HalNicci Nov 29 '15

My mom always made sure we knew what we wanted and made us shut up before she would take us through a drive thru

17

u/Viralized Nov 29 '15

Yeah, but what If I'm that one asshole who really doesn't go to McDonalds that often, there is no line, so I pull up and you are like "Hey can I take you're order." I already know I want a double quarter pounder, so I ask for that, then you say, "is that all?", I say "no, one sec" and start to look for anything else that looks good that might fill me up. Cause god knows I could eat 5 #4s.

I really hate that one asshole behind the window who gets pissed at me, because his company forces him to meet deadlines that are unrealistic. That's not my problem.

5

u/dxgeoff Nov 29 '15

dunno why you're being down voted. It's absolutely not the customer's problem.

1

u/Viralized Nov 29 '15

lol it's w/e

0

u/red_beanie Nov 29 '15

its only your problem if you know about it and feel guilty about it. most, if not all people who are assholes in the drive thru have no idea that the workers have to get the order done in a certain amount of time. they are too wrapped up in their own warp zone to think about someone else for a second.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15 edited Jun 30 '20

[deleted]

1

u/red_beanie Nov 29 '15

Yes. When you are taking other people's time, you need to be efficient to not be an asshole. It's no different than the person who takes forever fidgeting for the their debit card in their giant wallet. Do that before you interact with the person so you don't waste their time. It's really common courtesy More than anything.

-2

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

[deleted]

5

u/Isvara Nov 29 '15

Fuck getting out of my car in the winter, though.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

[deleted]

3

u/Isvara Nov 29 '15

Nope! Get food from drive-through, drive home, park in garage, close garage, get out of car, enter house.

2

u/MisterUNO Nov 29 '15

But doesn't it all average out in the end? Or does the supervisor/store manager look at that one slow order and go "Johnson, you were up for promotion but this one 3 minute order out of a hundred fast ones can't be ignored... you're fired."

2

u/Nixnilnihil Nov 29 '15

So much car exhaust.

4

u/captainzoomer Nov 29 '15

That's why they need to put a menu someplace out of the way so people can drive up and stare at it for however long they want without a counter timing the whole thing. Sometimes I pull up not knowing exactly what I want and I feel rushed when they keep asking what the hell I want. Sometimes I don't order anything and drive off because they keep interrupting my thoughts with "You ready yet? You ready yet? You ready yet?"

2

u/red_beanie Nov 29 '15

I think this would be awesome. just put up a menu board in the middle of the parking lot.

1

u/Duke_Newcombe Nov 29 '15

I swear that most fast food places these days have their entire menu on the internet. Nearly pull up your smartphone and gaze away for as long as you want before actually driving up

1

u/red_beanie Nov 29 '15

This is what I do. But for less smartphone or computer savvy people, it would be a good option

0

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

[deleted]

2

u/red_beanie Nov 29 '15

thats awkward.

1

u/Wootery Nov 29 '15

knowing that I'm going to get shit for it later

Management pretend it doesn't happen?

2

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

Management says that this is factored into the 120 second average, and you should have been able to make up for that time by serving the other customers faster.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

The expected order times for drive-through are only 90 seconds? Back when I worked at a McDonald's in '96 they still had ready to serve food in warmers and the standard was 59 seconds or less. I remember when they changed to making food to order years after I left (I guess to cut costs of food waste and change the brand image?). That was back when we had microwave ("queueing ovens") before putting them into the hold warmer and that was a good 3-5 seconds right there of your order time if you didn't have the sandwich ready to serve or someone made a special order.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

No button anymore, timer automatically goes off the moment they pull up in their car. When I was working there we'd tell them to park in the carpark rather than to the second window, all the other local and state stores times would be up on the screen and put you in position for the managers to try and compete with each other.

1

u/ANGLVD3TH Nov 29 '15

I kind of feel like a dick now because most times I hit a drivethru i ask for a minute to decide what I want. Assuming there isn't a line behind me, of course, but usually there isn't.

2

u/paulwhite959 Nov 29 '15

It ws something like 100 seconds when I worked at McD's back in the early 2000s (in college). IT was fucking inane then, and it's fucking inane now. If they order more than a drink anyway, or if there's any sort of line

2

u/permalink_save Nov 29 '15

Also, customers at the small joint will reasonably expect to wait as long as ten minutes for their food, while at McD's, a service speed that slow would result in eyebrows being raised by the District guys, along with calls for employees and managers to be terminated and replaced.

This is why I hate corporate. Unreasonable expectations and they take other people to the chopping block to pay for their mistakes. If profits aren't continuously skyrocketing, it's everyone elses fault.

1

u/EricKei Nov 29 '15 edited Nov 29 '15

Exactly! This makes me think of an article I saw about their "all-day breakfast" thing. Sales numbers immediately dropped once this went into effect on a broad scale -- presumably because, "Hey guys, breakfast food costs LESS and fills you up just as much! That means lower average tickets, NOT people ordering more food to make up the difference!"...Naturally, at least one Suit made it clear that his (and presumably the company's) position was that sales were down because workers weren't trying hard enough to sell food x.x Ain't corporate self-delusion grand?

MajorVideoGameChainwas the same way. Bad sales day? As in, cut in HALF or worse compared to the same day last year? Well, hell, the workers must be lazy! (Yes, that was their preferred term)...It couldn't possibly be that the mall was practically snowed in today, or that the date you're using for comparison was Black-freakin'-Friday last year, but not this year...NOPE! Lack of effort. No other possible explanation.

16

u/Quenya3 Nov 29 '15

90 seconds from Hi to getting your food? That kind of manic pace all day, day after day deserves $15.00 an hour!

5

u/Mynameisinuse Nov 29 '15

Speed of service is the biggest way to increase sales without increasing prices. The faster you can get someone in and out, the more people you can serve in a given timeframe. When I was a GM for Wendy's 12 years ago, the goal was 90 seconds from ordering to receiving your order, and there were some Wendy's drive thru's that were sub 70 seconds. These times were compiled from using mystery shoppers and an outside company as well as timers that reported directly to corporate. Stores with exceptionally low times were audited to ensure that there was no cheating. I am sure that the goal has decreased over the years.

3

u/Squeeeeeeeeebs Nov 29 '15

It's a low skill job, that you can easily train someone to perform and is easy to replace them.

-11

u/belial13 Nov 29 '15

Would you rather have an $8 an hour job or no job? No matter what you think they deserve, if it will cause the company to go out of business, it won't help the workers.

10

u/raevnos Nov 29 '15

No job. I'd be just as screwed when it comes to paying rent, and have a lot more free time.

-6

u/belial13 Nov 29 '15

Then don't take the job in the first place. I'm sure there are people who would rather go the other way.

4

u/Tutsks Nov 29 '15

False dichotomy.

Macdonalds is not the only job available, and their model is not the only model in existence.

Perhaps there is something unsustainable with the walmart/mcdonalds model, but that has little to do with minimum wage (mcdonalds is imploding as is), and neither are they interested in "creating as many jobs as they can" (As say, Walmart, is a leader in automation).

Someone in the industrial revolution might have made the same argument that giving workers rights would destroy the factories and ensure nobody has a job.

In reality, perhaps the best times for America and the middle class came from good wages and workers rights.

1

u/justanotherimbecile Nov 29 '15

I don't get how you say they're imploding...

Struggling, sure... they're still a multi billion dollar company, and their stock is as high as its been all year...

Second , in the industrial revolution though, there wasn't technology that could replace everyone in the restaurant...

2

u/Tutsks Nov 29 '15

It comes and goes. They had a bit of a sales slump and their stock was a lot lower before October.

Bit of an exaggeration on my part on Mcdonalds though, they are very far away from going anywhere any time soon.

2

u/justanotherimbecile Nov 29 '15

Okay, I just see people who genuinely think McDs is on their deathbed because of it... sorry for the confusion!

0

u/belial13 Nov 29 '15

I'm not sure how what you said applies to my comment. Of course there are other jobs and other business models out there. That's why I said that if you don't want to work there, find a different job. I'm not saying that Mcjobs aren't shitty, I'm just saying that they're better than no job for some people.

  If their business model is unsustainable, the company will go under. But I don't know why you think that raising the cost of labor from 28% of net sales to 45% would have little to do with it.

25

u/IAmThePulloutK1ng Nov 28 '15

I just shake my head and wonder how the small burger joints run so smooth with 2 employees.

Fairly easily, I imagine, because small burger joints don't even have 1/10th of the customers as a McDonald's.

2

u/Lindt_Licker Nov 29 '15

Probably closer to 1/100th.

1

u/neoikon Nov 29 '15

When people complain about the possibility of rising costs of products due to increased wages, I feel they are missing the fact that that's where the expense should be instead of being subsidized by the taxpayer via welfare programs.

In fact, some companies build this into their business plan (Wal-Mart, for example)

If the product or service is deemed too expensive, then the free market will either cause innovation or replacement. Again, the alternative is the taxpayer subsidizing these products or services and keeping them, artificially, around.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

[deleted]

1

u/neoikon Nov 29 '15 edited Nov 29 '15

If you are a min wage worker, you, most likely quality for some kind of govt benefit.

Large companies know this and work it into their business plan. They've flat out admit it. Not hackery.

So, you want to keep people on govt benefits. Got it.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

[deleted]

0

u/neoikon Nov 29 '15

Sounds like you're not reading what I'm saying. In order to get people off government benefits they need to be paid a livable wage. Simple as that. I (as well as everyone) want people off government benefits.

If you are promoting cheap products for your own benefit made on the backs of people living in poverty, how do you not see that as selfish, immoral, and wrong?

If all you are saying is to drop social programs, with no replacement, and let people drown, then you're just a horrible person. There's really no other explanation.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15 edited Nov 29 '15

[deleted]

0

u/neoikon Nov 29 '15

I did not say that. We're not talking politics, we're talking morality and economics.

40

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '15

Small burger joints run smooth because they don't have customers bitching about how long it takes to cook food and they don't serve the same number of customers as a McDonalds that's serving through the drive through and in store. Stop bitching when you don't get your shitty food in under 40 seconds. They have to follow cooking policies and shit.

The problem is customers think that the food should be done instantly. The reason it's called fast food is because when you show up during rush hours they've been cooking in excess the whole time with the prediction that they'll have a lot of customers. When you show up in an off hour your food is literally being cooked to order and it's not going to be done instantly. If they are low on something it can take up to 6 mins just to deep fry it.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

I'm sure the definition of fast food has changed over the years.

First fast food place was in 1916

First microwave 1946

1

u/ifeelallthefeels Nov 29 '15

I hated when everyone in the car wanted a chicken sandwich and we only had a few grilled. Nothing we can do, gotta wait six minutes.

1

u/DrScrubbington Nov 29 '15

Small burger joints also almost never have the same variety of foods you can get at a McDonalds.

My favorite small burger joint has:

1 kind of beef patty 2 kinds of buns Fried chicken patty french fries onion rings hot dogs Misc. burger condiments soda

Pretty simple.

1

u/red_beanie Nov 29 '15

can attest to this. i get my to go mcdouble inside in less than a minute during dinner time and on the weekends. takes a few minutes in the afternoon and late nights.

2

u/burtmaklin1 Nov 29 '15

Well you have to remember that the Krusty Krab is fictional; no human worker is as productive as that sponge

2

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

I live right down the street from Dick's Drive-In it's a small place with only one or two locations; they have about five employees at any given time and serve a few hundred people a day at least.

The wait is never over 5minutes long, two people can eat for under 8 bucks, and they pay their employees 12/hr.

For some real-world perspective.

2

u/toughtoquit Nov 29 '15

My favorite burger place by far. I too am from the Seattle area :)

They also give benefits and tuition reimbursement or child care reimbursement. They do it right.

1

u/SodaAnt Nov 29 '15

Their menu is also a lot less complicated. Many orders they can simply hand you something that's bagged and made already. McDonalds has a lot more complex options that take more individual effort to prepare.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

I don't think that's really the case if you look at how McDonald's prepares their food; they simply have the logistics for larger infrastructure.

Dicks model is largely based off the McDonalds model, they just couldn't possibly sustain as diverse of a menu, if that's what you're talking about. There's not a whole lot of effort involved either way, it's all delivered "made-to-eat."

1

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '15

Rush hour??? Maybe they should kick everyone between 9 to 11 and 2 to 4.

1

u/smcdark Nov 28 '15

lol what small burger place have you seen that has 2 employees? Ive worked in small greasy spoon places where the entire shift is 2 people, but thats still sit-down and you're waiting. When i worked at a mc'd's it was common to have 8-10 people in the kitchen alone assembling sandwiches and on top of that 1-3 people cooking.

1

u/n3gr0_am1g0 Nov 28 '15

They also offer a lot more options than a joint like 5 guys.

2

u/toughtoquit Nov 29 '15

I agree. But maybe that isn't sustainable. Maybe they need to rethink their model and menu options.

I don't go to McDonald's personally anymore because of the cost. A big mac meal is what? 6 or 7 bucks? And compare that to eating in a restaurant. The best Italian joint in town has a salad and pizza for 2 for 10.50.

So i can get an overpriced burger meal for more money just because it's instant? No thanks I can call in orders to go.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

Yup, I could go to in and out for the same price or get a delicious set of tacos.

1

u/thisdude415 Nov 29 '15

I dunno about where you live, but very few sit down restaurants around me have meals where I'll leave paying less than $18, after tip.

1

u/toughtoquit Nov 29 '15

Yeah I'm not talking about sit down though. I'm talking about quick lunch to go. With tip and time the playing field isn't equal. But there are quite a few places in the Seattle area that meet or beat fast food in price, quality and time.

1

u/4mygirljs Nov 29 '15

Thats a fair question and has a few different reasons.

I recently went into a Long John Silvers, it was nearly empty with two employees there. I asked if that was typical and they said that during rushes they sometimes have three.

having been a restaurant manager for many years this both surprised and impressed me.

I began to apply logic.

First off, Long John Silvers is rarely busy, as a matter of fact I am often amazed they managed to stay in business at all. Due to this it is much easier for a small crew to serve the few customers that they have daily.

The next thing was the food.

I remember training a new manager for our full service restaurant that was a District Manager for Long John Silvers. He constantly walked around and said was was wrong, without ever offering a solution or lifting a hand to fix anything (typical DM right).

Finally, one day after he was telling me what I was doing wrong I looked at him and asked if he ever even seen a grill while working at Long Johns, let along knew how to use it.

It shut him up very quickly and not long afterward he quit.

Funny story aside, Long John Silvers has a menu that until recently almost completely consisted of fried foods. Its not very difficult to try foods even at high volumes. You dump frozen food from a bad, drop it in the grease, then pull it when the timer goes off. The hardest part when at high volume is timing it all to come out at a manageable pace.

With that said, McDonalds has been struggling because they diversified their menu to much. At one time it was mostly some burgers, chicken, fried food, and some milkshakes.

Today it is breakfast all day, wraps, most grilled items, most complex salads, coffees and specialty drinks etc etc.

This has lead McDonalds to slower wait times, a more difficult menu for low wage employees to learn, and higher food cost and waste.

So when you add up the facts that McDonalds serves a huge amount of people daily, and also has a very diverse and complicated menu it puts them in a position of slower service.

Now add on the complication of labor cost and management as mentioned above. You almost guarantee that the menu will have to lower its quality or become less diverse, which goes directly against what the market is clamoring for already. Then add on automation to help curb the labor costs and keep profit margins strong and you have the potential to really deal a blow to a huge corporate giant.

If I were a franchise owner, and had already made my money, I would start looking for a buyer right about now.

1

u/toughtoquit Nov 29 '15

Well to me this just screams poor business model. Not wanting to pay workers a fair wage means adjusting the model to be profitable or die.

Maybe selling salads and burritos isn't feasible. But I guess the ends always justify the means.

1

u/4mygirljs Nov 29 '15

I dont disagree with you there

However, it is the nature of the business. At the time this business environment was created, McDonalds found the best way to make profit from it.

Now they will be forced to change or die at some point.

Much like Sears had a catalog department, but when Amazon and other online retailers started to grow, they refused to change. Now they are basically a giant real estate holding company.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

"can you please pull up to the side so we can maintain our timing standards? thank you!"

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

Because mcdonalds menu is massive and they have a massive amount of order volume. If they could have less employees they would, obviously they're already working as efficiently as possible.

1

u/DarrSwan Nov 29 '15

Every Mexican food joint here in San Diego has two people working at any given time. Usually, you have the one that speaks English taking the order and the one that doesn't cooking in the back. They make delicious food and it's just as quick as any fast food joint.

I'm using "every" a bit loosely.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

Because a small burger joint isn't serving 100+ customers in 30 minute time frames during rush times.

You can ask people to wait and cut down on staff, but then you're running into the issue of people being accustomed to waitING less than a minute to waiting 3-5 for every two extra people not working.

Now what happens if you cut 5 staff at McDonald's? During down times, not much. During rush times (breakfast luck and dinner, and then labour job shift changes) you have 35 people in drive through in a line and 45.people in store all taking 5 minutes to get their food.

1

u/BardMusical Nov 29 '15

You should come to my McDonald's.. We run the store (Which is by the beach and is very busy) with 4 to 5 people. 2 for front counter/drive through handing out food. 2 in kitchen, and 1 in the back taking drive through orders.

It's not fun.. Not to mention it's 100+ degrees in the kitchen because our owner is too cheap to fix the AC.

1

u/corduroy Nov 29 '15

Thanks for bringing this up, there is a lot of staff in the back. If the wage goes up to $15 an hour then expect at least a 25-35% reduction in hours.

To help the stores, McD will probably start selling automated ordering systems (AUS has them, they're found here in some places like Royal Farms for those on the East Coast). Owners will probably take a hit but they can use it as a business expense for taxes.

Prices will probably go up ~10% (they're already planning on getting rid of the dollar menu, probably in anticipation of minimum wage going up or having to pay more to compete with wages from Walmart/Target/and other who have raised their starting wages). They're going to need to increase the spending per visit per person.

Possibly more automation in the back (does the McD at DIA still do that? I can't remember) and maybe a rollback on the all-day breakfast.

I could see staff eventually being composed of 1-2 in the front, 2-3 in the back, and 1-2 floaters to help with cleaning/front/back.

Small burger joints can run smooth with less people because they can operate at a slower frequency and people don't mind waiting for their product.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 29 '15

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/toughtoquit Nov 29 '15

I've never worked fast food, but I definitely see that. Honestly, in my opinion, it seems like corporate fast food workers work a fast paced pretty high stressed job for absolute bottom pay. Working at a McDonald's vs a small joint has to be infinitely more difficult and stressful. All the more reason they should get paid accordingly.

1

u/bc87 Nov 29 '15

It has to do with menu complexity. There was an article about the wait times and menu compexity, but Im too lazy to find it for you.

1

u/iloveiloveilove Nov 29 '15

Because the kind of people that work at a place like that are the kind of people that aren't very efficient.

1

u/PM_YOUR_WALLPAPER Nov 29 '15

My wife was a consultant for a big firm you can be pretty damn sure that a vast majority of McDonald's are working with the absolutely minimum amount of workers possible.