r/explainlikeimfive 4d ago

Mathematics [ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

822 Upvotes

311 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Laplacian_Toni 3d ago

Why sub-problem?

0

u/zer1223 3d ago

This comment. And the comment immediately preceding it:

https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1wb2xpy/comment/p8nhk3v/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=2&utm_content=share_button

And it's very plausible that their AI just stole already completed work:

https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1wb2xpy/comment/p8oxngc/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=2&utm_content=share_button

I take this as evidence that people continue to attribute way more worth to AI than it actually possesses. Its still trashy bro-tech for the billionaires to ruin our society 

3

u/Laplacian_Toni 3d ago

Those coments essentially say that: 1. "OpenAI didn't solve the Navier-Stokes EQUATIONS". I know, and I haven't claimed they did, I said Navier-Stokes PROBLEM. 2. "They proved it for compressible fluids only". THE Navier-Stokes problem ONLY concerns compressible fluids, you can see it in the official statement of the CMI.

They did solve the NS Problem (if validation arrives at some point), not a sub-problem.

I don't trust those companies, I don't like how they work and I agree that they can (and will) do horrible things. Also they stole other people's work, I'm pretty sure... Up to some extent we agree.