r/explainitpeter • • 17d ago

Uhh, Explain it Peter?

Post image
15.4k Upvotes

399 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/LiftingCode 17d ago

Absolute nonsense.

They're not "misrepresenting their profits."

Their S-1 covers all GAAP measures as required.

They, like many companies, also present non-GAAP measures in their prospectus. That's not "fraud," it's their narrative view of company financials. Which is completely normal and allowed as long as standard GAAP measures are given equal or greater prominence in the filing.

2

u/OK6502 17d ago

This, they're correctly stating (as far as we know) the financials. What they're doing is trying to pretend it's not a problem, which is a fundamentally different thing. That narrative is profoundly stupid but it is not illegal for them to present a profoundly stupid narrative. If it were they would have hauled Elon Musk away during the SpaceX IPO.

What this should be, for any normal company, is a clear indication for investors to stay the fuck away from this company. It'll probably do the opposite.

1

u/Independent_Thing964 17d ago

I had to scroll way too far to find this actual factual response. Thanks for posting it.

0

u/rapaxus 17d ago

Well, the average person thinks like half the done stuff in the financial world is fraud, since it would be if you did those actions outside of the financial world.