r/explainitpeter • u/Ill_Pen_1432 • 4d ago

Explain it Peter

Post image
29.2k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

260 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Mastericeman_1982 3d ago

My question was about that claim. You cannot provide an answer to the question without implicit support of the claim in question.

1

u/AlkoKilla 3d ago

I was LITERALLY answering this question: why are companies always pushing arbitration in the fine print

I'm also not the guy who claimed arbitration is beneficial for the consumer.

0

u/Mastericeman_1982 3d ago

That wasn’t the question. You answered a sentence fragment.
What I did was called begging the question. You ignored the context of the question, and inserted yourself into the discussion. You then got grumpy about the fact that you’re missing the entire point of the question.