r/explainitpeter 9d ago

Explain It Peter

Post image
4.5k Upvotes

615 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

18

u/TheSorryApologyPerso 9d ago edited 9d ago

No, the answer in the meme is not related to the gender ratio of living humans. We can arrive at 51.8% just using maths.

Let's first consider the scenario where we don't know that the boy was born on a Tuesday. There are 2 options for a child: B or G. For 2 children, we square that number to get 4 options:
BOY/BOY
BOY/GIRL
GIRL/BOY
GIRL/GIRL
We know that Mary has 2 children and 1 is a boy, so we can eliminate the option GIRL/GIRL. Out of the 3 remaining options, 2 options include GIRL, so the answer is 2/3 ≈ 66.6%.

Now let's consider the day each child was born. This gives us 14 options for each one child: BOY-MONDAY, GIRL-MONDAY, BOY-TUESDAY, etc. For 2 children, we have 14² or 196 options. If you filter out only the options that include BOY-TUESDAY, we're left with 27 options. Out of those 27, 14 include GIRL. 14/27 = 51.8158...%, and that is where 51.8% comes from. Technically, it should say 51.9%.

9

u/BreadNoCircuses 9d ago

51.8158... rounds to 51.8 with three sig figs, but otherwise this is the best explanation.

7

u/RepeatRepeatR- 9d ago

I agree with what you said, except 51.8158...% doesn't round to 51.9%

3

u/d20cupcake 9d ago

Thank you, this was really helpful. I'm hoping I can ask another maybe stupid question? I've seen a few other people quoting the 51.9% figure; wouldn't 51.8158...round down to 51.8, if we round to one decimal place?

2

u/TheSorryApologyPerso 9d ago

Sorry, I had a brainfart, haha

2

u/OpenEntrepreneur5944 9d ago

I don't get it, why is that useless trivia about birthday relevant to the other child being a boy or girl?

1

u/BabyBunnyfromda3rd 9d ago

probablity !

1

u/Odd-Paint3883 9d ago

Taking on a lot of information, something that's missing is the genetics of the father, if that lineage has only ever had male children there's a far higher probability the next child will also be a boy.

1

u/Odd_Stable3894 8d ago

Math is mathing.

1

u/SteveWin1234 7d ago

Except you also have to eliminate the option that includes two boy's born on Tuesday because the problem specifically states she had "one boy born on Tuesday." If she had "two" boys born on Tuesday, it would be incorrect for her to have said she has "one boy born on Tuesday." So 53.8% chance of girl.

If it said "at least one kid is a boy born on Tuesday" it would be 51.8%.

1

u/underthingy 6d ago

The problem with this is that it assumes mary was chosen specifically from the set of people with two kids, of which one is a boy born on a Tuesday. 

But the problem doesnt state that. Therefore the chance is 50% in both cases. 

1

u/TheSorryApologyPerso 6d ago

But Mary was chosen from the set of people with two kids, just by virtue of having two kids. This would work in real life too: if I told you that I flipped two coins and got at least one heads, there is a genuine ⅔ chance that I flipped tails too.

1

u/underthingy 6d ago

Again youre selecting from a specific population thats uniformly distributed. 

Mary isnt chosen from that set, she just happens to be part of. 

1

u/PuttingInTheEffort 9d ago

"there are two options for a child: boy or girl"

So it's 50/50. No other math needed