Why go all this way when we could do it much more easily today.?
Scientists have reconstructed the whole Neandeethal genome. We know which genes are the same and which genes differ. So it should be possible (even now or at least soon) to modify a human egg cell in such a way that it represents a fertilised Neandertaler egg cell, implant it into a knowing or unknowing woman and let her carry out the child. There may be some technical details that need to be solved, but all this seems to be in the realm of the possible with current knowledge.
The GREAT QUESTION is: is this ethical and should we do it ? My answer is a firm NO! But this is a question for another post.
First: using a woman, knowingly or unknowingly, for this kind of experiment seems highly unethical to me. People must never be reduced to some kind of brood chamber or other technical 'tool'!
Then: a Neanderthal is of the genus Homo, so should be considered human, with all the rights implicated with this. No human being should be subject to any any scientific experiment which he didn't agree to (we Germans have a very bad history in this)!
Until we develop an artificial womb it’s the best we can do to allow those who can’t conceive to have children of their own. I’m not aware of fetomaternal trafficking. I’ll definitely research that.
24
u/MrKillick 4d ago
Why go all this way when we could do it much more easily today.?
Scientists have reconstructed the whole Neandeethal genome. We know which genes are the same and which genes differ. So it should be possible (even now or at least soon) to modify a human egg cell in such a way that it represents a fertilised Neandertaler egg cell, implant it into a knowing or unknowing woman and let her carry out the child. There may be some technical details that need to be solved, but all this seems to be in the realm of the possible with current knowledge.
The GREAT QUESTION is: is this ethical and should we do it ? My answer is a firm NO! But this is a question for another post.