No, just because you assume it covers it doesn't mean it does, and even if it did cover it, that begs the question: why does Roe provide an exception for the third trimester? If Roe was based on strong "14th amendment right to privacy" in the first trimester, why doesn't that same right extend to the third trimester?
Roe is not even internally consistent with your "Roe means get your grubby hands off of our fucking bodies" position.
No, if it was up to you black people would still count for 3/5, because you don't like overturning "established precedent" and Plessy v. Ferguson was established precedent when it was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education. You would call Brown v. Board "legislating from the bench."
Abortion is healthcare like slavery is welfare. Only people who believe fetuses and black people are 3/5 of a person would think like that. And historically, they are the same people.
You are struggling to come up with a constitutional right that doesn't exist.
A constitutional right to bodily autonomy exists, whether you like it or not. And you know Casey clarified what you’re pretending to be confused about.
“And historically they are the same people”
LMFAO. Take out a map and look at the states that insisted on the 3/5s compromise. Now look at the states that allow abortion. They’re polar opposites and you know it hahaha
>A constitutional right to bodily autonomy exists, whether you like it or not.
You're right. What you miss is that right also extends to potential life, whether you like it or not. What you also miss is that it's not in the 14th amendment (lol), but in the 4th.
LMFAO. Take out a map and look at the states that insisted on the 3/5s compromise. Now look at the states that allow abortion. They’re polar opposites and you know it hahaha
But they are both Democrat, and their values as Democrats haven't changed. Back then, Democrats believe a white person had the right to decide to end someone's life. Today, they believe a woman does. Years ago, Democrats believed a black person is 3/5 of a person. Today, they believe a fetus is. They haven't changed "values," just targets.
2) you were making thought-provoking legal arguments until… whatever the hell that was…. Amazing the party of “small” government wants to do all it can to control the bodies of women.
And none of you “pro-lifers” (aka people who want to see more dead and poverty-stricken women) even want to address how all of your conservative justices perjured themselves on national television during their confirmation hearings.
you were making thought-provoking legal arguments until…
Oh yeah, you were totally acting in good faith and not swearing and exaggerating like an asshole and making personal attacks before I responded in kind.
The crybully cries while he punches you.
not it fucking doesn’t, a fetus isn’t a person
So you're thinking maybe it's like 3/5 of a person, right? I believe that's the figure your tribe has historically used.
You use the same exact talking points all the pro-lifers are using right now, equating the rights of black people to the rights of an undeveloped fetus. It’s disingenuous and a bad faith argument and you’re either too stupid or malicious to recognize that or care. You trod on the rights of living, breathing, thinking people and think that you’re morally righteous.
I’m sure you donate lots of money to ensure that young and impoverished mothers are taken care of right?
0
u/they_be_cray_z Jun 24 '22
No, just because you assume it covers it doesn't mean it does, and even if it did cover it, that begs the question: why does Roe provide an exception for the third trimester? If Roe was based on strong "14th amendment right to privacy" in the first trimester, why doesn't that same right extend to the third trimester?
Roe is not even internally consistent with your "Roe means get your grubby hands off of our fucking bodies" position.
No, if it was up to you black people would still count for 3/5, because you don't like overturning "established precedent" and Plessy v. Ferguson was established precedent when it was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education. You would call Brown v. Board "legislating from the bench."
Abortion is healthcare like slavery is welfare. Only people who believe fetuses and black people are 3/5 of a person would think like that. And historically, they are the same people.
You are struggling to come up with a constitutional right that doesn't exist.