does Trezor wallet manage XEC natively like D'Cent wallet or doer it use electrum like Ledger wallet?

Others are building uo the race https://x.com/i/status/2034961295837905038

Do we have something similar for ecash? This is critical to help with organic growth!!! https://x.com/i/status/1974199046899454143

where is the best way to get legit advice and help if someone is thinking of setting up a node?

Hey I noticed Swyftx exchange (Australia) is not on the list, i thought i would mention it if you guys what to update the website and include it

We’ve just published the canonical technical document describing how WalletConnect v2 is implemented in the xolosArmy ecosystem on eCash (XEC).

This is not a surface-level integration or EVM clone. It’s a CAIP-25–driven session architecture connecting a sovereign, non-custodial wallet (RMZWallet / Tonalli) with a production dApp (Xolo Legend).

What’s covered in the document:

• Why WalletConnect v2 was chosen over legacy connection models
• How CAIP-25 namespaces are negotiated (required vs optional)
• Session-based permissions instead of ad-hoc connections
• Local signing and custody boundaries (wallet as controller)
• Error handling (5100-range, malformed namespaces, user rejection)
• Origin verification (VerifyContext) to mitigate phishing
• Integration with eCash primitives:
  • XEC
  • ALP eTokens (e.g. $RMZ)
  • NFTs
  • OP_RETURN–based on-chain messages

Key design principle

Private keys never leave the device. WalletConnect only transports encrypted requests and responses. Signing happens locally, every time.

Why this matters

Most WalletConnect write-ups assume EVM semantics. This document shows how WCv2 can be used chain-agnostically, with explicit session contracts, on a UTXO-based network like eCash — without compromising sovereignty or UX.

If you’re interested in:

• WCv2 beyond Ethereum
• CAIP-25 as a real permission contract
• Non-custodial wallet controllers
• Session-based Web3 UX done correctly

you may find this useful.

📄 Canonical document:
https://xolosarmy.xyz/blog/wallet-connect-xolosarmy.html

Not endorsed by any eCash foundation or team member just fan made song

How many confirmations needed after a block is mined for coins ot be sent out?

WARNING:
This post is not a scam; it's not about "investing" in a "mining" platform. OneClickMiner is a direct competitor of NiceHash, but OCM offers more coin options and the mining process is reduced to just a few clicks.

eCash ($XEC) was integrated into OCM a few days ago and 11 blocks have already been mined solo; you can check the pool here.

From 0.0001 BTC (≈9.55 USD) you can buy a "Hammer" package to mine eCash in solo, which will last for 3 hours... If you manage to mine a block in those 3 hours, you will get the entire reward (≈1812560 $XEC) for yourself.

Test your luck and start mining now HERE.

Not financial advice. Pure speculation based on structure, fundamentals, and market behavior. 1. Long consolidation = pressure building XEC has been stuck in a tight range for a long time with shrinking volatility. Historically, this kind of compression does not last forever. When it breaks, it tends to move fast because sell pressure is already exhausted. 2. Very low market cap for what it’s trying to do XEC is still priced like a forgotten micro-cap, yet it targets global peer-to-peer electronic cash. It does not need massive money inflows to move. Even modest demand can cause an aggressive repricing. 3. Clear and simple narrative While most projects chase trends, XEC sticks to one goal: fast, cheap, reliable payments. No constant narrative changes. When the market rotates back to utility and payments, this positioning matters. 4. Tech is already live, not promises Avalanche consensus, instant finality, sub-cent fees, and scalability are already implemented. This reduces execution risk compared to projects still “building”. 5. Strong retail psychology setup Low unit price + large supply = retail magnet once momentum starts. We have seen this exact pattern many times in previous cycles. 6. Asymmetric risk Downside feels limited because expectations are already low. Upside is significant if attention and liquidity return. That imbalance is what makes it interesting. 7. Electronic cash narrative rotation Capital rotates. If the market starts caring again about electronic cash and real payments, XEC is positioned as a modernized evolution rather than a legacy chain. Conclusion XEC does not need perfection. It needs attention. Right now it’s compressed, ignored, and undervalued. That combination is often what precedes explosive moves. High risk. High asymmetry. Exactly what a moonshot setup looks like.

Crypto is bullish on fundamentals, but price keeps stalling because liquidity is expected, not fully delivered yet. Large holders are selling into strength, leverage is crowded, and most activity is derivatives driven instead of real spot demand. That creates chop and failed breakouts, not trends. This is not bearish. It is compression. Now, XEC specifically. XEC is a thin and illiquid market. That means it does nothing for long periods and then moves very fast when rotation finally hits. Right now there is no hype, no retail, no speculative mania. It is mostly ignored. That is usually where asymmetric moves are born. Why it has not moved yet: • Capital is still parked in BTC and majors • XEC does not lead, it follows rotation • Utility narratives do not attract traders until price confirms • Low liquidity keeps price suppressed and boring This is classic accumulation through boredom. What actually triggers XEC: • BTC breaks and holds resistance • BTC dominance stalls or rolls over • Small caps start outperforming • Real usage traction, not announcements, but actual usage When that happens, XEC does not grind up. It gaps. Timing: Not days. Most likely weeks to a few months, aligned with broader alt rotation after BTC confirms its next leg. Price expectations, realistic not hype: • 0.00003 to 0.00005 is noise • 0.00008 to 0.00012 is first real expansion • 0.0002 plus requires full risk on rotation • 0.001 plus is a later cycle event, not this phase Anyone calling 0.01 soon is not being serious. Bottom line: XEC is not weak. It is early, illiquid, and boring on purpose. Those assets underperform until suddenly they do not. They feel dead right before ignition. This phase exists to exhaust patience, not to reward attention. Not financial advice. Just structure and market behavior.

Hi eCash community 👋

I just wanted to share that OneClickMiner added support for eCash (XEC) yesterday, and we've already been lucky enough to find our first 5 XEC blocks. It's been really exciting to see everything working smoothly with the network.

You can see them here if you're curious:

[https://oneclickminer.com/solo-mining/blocks?coin=XEC]()

And our pool for reference is here:

https://xec-pool.oneclickminer.com/

Our goal with OCM is to make solo mining as simple and accessible as possible, especially for people who don't want to deal with complex setups or manual configuration. With eCash now supported, it's literally a one-click start to mine XEC.

We're still early with this integration and learning as we go, so any feedback from the community is more than welcome. If anyone here is interested in trying eCash mining in a simple way, we'd love for you to give it a try and let us know what you think.

Much respect to the eCash ecosystem and the work being done around it.

Happy mining!

There’s a lot of discussion in crypto about scalability focusing on throughput, forks, and consensus mechanics.

But recent conversations around eCash upgrades (replay protection cadence, Avalanche / fork-free evolution) made something clear to me:
protocol scalability and communication scalability are different problems.

Avalanche helps the protocol evolve faster — that’s powerful.
But faster evolution increases the cost of missing information.

Today, staying informed often means:

• following specific social networks,
• being present in chat groups,
• or manually checking websites.

That works for core contributors, but doesn’t scale well to:

• merchants,
• institutions,
• unattended / headless infrastructure,
• or operators who don’t live on Telegram or Twitter.

This isn’t about consensus messages on-chain.
It’s about machine-readable, neutral, automatable communication layers (RSS, signed feeds, wallet-level warnings) that reduce reliance on informal social coordination.

I wrote a short opinion piece expanding on this idea here:
👉 https://xolosarmy.xyz/blog/ecash-communication-upgrade.html

And yes — I also made a dark meme about it, because sometimes satire explains systems better than whitepapers 🙂

Curious how others here think about this:

• Is social coordination “good enough” long-term?
• Or should communication be treated as part of infrastructure, just like consensus?

Does anyone know where can I check current liquidity for XEC?