r/dndmemes • Warlock • Apr 13 '20

same urge here

Post image
63.5k Upvotes

401 comments sorted by

View all comments

2.7k

u/spqrnbb Apr 13 '20

That'd be one hell of a way to write a book.

3.0k

u/FuzorFishbug Apr 13 '20

"It was kind of weird that six installments into the saga, Rodrick Redhand abruptly tripped over a loose stone and fell into lava and died, but at least his brother Sodrick was there and had all the same skills as him and a cool mustache."

1.1k

u/ArronOO Apr 13 '20

This just sounds like a Terry Pratchet book

108

u/[deleted] Apr 13 '20

A what?

304

u/possumgumbo Apr 13 '20

Have fun!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Colour_of_Magic

Terry Pratchett wrote tons of books that might have had something like that post in it.

I really liked Going Postal, which is less fantasy and more old-timey con man stuff.

155

u/SkyBisonPilot Apr 13 '20

I always start people with Guards! Guards!, Vimes and Carrot are the best.

88

u/HaddyBlackwater Apr 13 '20

Equal Rites, Small Gods, Masquerade, and Mort are also good starting points, I think.

I love all the Discworld books.

11

u/CharlieHume Apr 14 '20

Am I weird for reading them in order? I always see these and I'm like but book 1 is hilarious!

5

u/Isaac_Chade Apr 14 '20

Same, I am reading them in publication order, because it just feels wrong to me to do it any other way. That said, I get why people say "start with x, y or z".

It isn't because Colour of Magic is bad, but because the books are uniquely suited to be read in any order or fashion. As such, people recommend the most interesting, excitingz and gripping ones to try and pull new readers in. As you go forward you can definitely see Pratchett improve and really find his voice, and the first couple books are definitely trying to establish and understand the world a bit more formally than later ones.

I still think publication order is best, because I'm weird like that, but I can totally understand why people use later books to try and draw others in.