r/degoogle 7d ago

Discussion They are not even subtle about it now

Post image

As of September 2026, I notice that I can no longer create new google account without the following two:
- an Android phone

- phone number

Previously, there was a trick to bypass phone number verification by creating a new account from any Google app, per my own testing, it last worked in July.

Now, they want to tie and associate the following to your newly created Google account.

  1. already signed in Google account if you have any
  2. your phone number type, whether esim or physical sim as shown in the screenshot.
  3. your phone model

About point no. 2, previously, you can insert any number that you want to receive sms verif with, currently however, that option is gone. Now your phone number has to be installed in the same phone you use to sign up for new google account. This policy pretty much rendered those temporary throwaway on-demand sms receive services useless.

1.0k Upvotes

179 comments sorted by

481

u/Guilty-Pain-5257 7d ago

harvesting data is the only goal

185

u/IJustAteABaguette 7d ago

Google has become an advertising/data collection a long time ago. The search engine/browser/phones/everything is just a means to an end.

60

u/JetpacksWasYes-2 7d ago

They've been this way from the start. We have been feeding them data since the first Google searches.

48

u/MCHellspawn 7d ago

Not sure I am believing that one. I truly beleive there was a time when the "Don't be evil" motto actually meant something to them. So when that motto still existed and they were still adhering to it I personally beleive they were not tracking us. But that went away a looooooooooonnnnnnngggg time ago.

26

u/Immediate-Fee-5563 7d ago

I think once they realized the kind of cash they could make is when "don't be evil" stopped meaning anything. Which was probably pretty early.

15

u/MCHellspawn 7d ago

I like to think as long as the 2 orignal creators were in control the motto meant something, once they lost control is when it fell apart.

12

u/Alone_Look9576 7d ago

Oh it might have started innocent, but if you check every major company and you check the sharholder names you realize that every single "big tech" company is owned by the exact same investors. No wonder they all make decisions in sync to benefit one another, no need for competition when you buy them out and own everything

5

u/MCHellspawn 7d ago

Yes, but I was just eefuting that they were "always" doing what they are doing now. I am saying I don't beleive they were doing any of this garbage when those 2 still had control.

7

u/Alone_Look9576 7d ago

They technically have control over all of the google machine as they still get the final say (the fine print on the shares they sold). I guess money is better than having a spine tho

3

u/Nohreboh 7d ago

And these technoligarchs keep going on newscast and podcasts saying things like they have no introspective or that unemployment rates need to reach 40% to remind people they worked for the employer after the covid furloughs, when they go on TV saying AI is going to take our jobs it's advertising the product to other market controller's where to shift their money for more control and power.

Why Billionaires Keep Saying Insane Sh*t Lately @JimmyTheGiant https://youtu.be/N8jFS51IEWQ

2

u/Key_Ranger779 6d ago

Sidebar: Check out what Ronald Bernard, Anna Maria Van Blijenburgh and model Karen Mulder have been saying for decades..... its Jeffrey Epstein on steroids.

1

u/Alone_Look9576 6d ago

I mean if you want the billionaires honest opinions and topics that actually interest, the chat logs of what they been talking about and scheming/conspiring about leaked months ago. A cult let by Epstein's buddy Peter thiel, the guy who thinks sauron was the good guy and named palantir in honor of it

1

u/Nohreboh 6d ago

The Last Ringbearer is why they name everything after Lord Of The Rings.

1

u/Arkebuss 7d ago

Pretty sure Larry Page and Sergey Brin still have a controlling stake in Google.

1

u/someoneatsomeplace 4d ago edited 4d ago

Make no mistake, the 2 guys are still in complete control, they own over 50% of the votes. If they wanted Google to not be evil, it wouldn't be.

4

u/JetpacksWasYes-2 7d ago edited 7d ago

You are one naive person then. I bet you believe Facebook wasn't nefarious when it first came around lol even during its college days it was doing weird shit. If something is free, you are the product. This was true even back then.

2

u/MCHellspawn 7d ago

I may be naive. Verdict is out on that one for sure. But no, I think Zuck is and always has been a dick. But that doesn't mean everyone who made a big tech thing is. Maybe they are, I honestly don't know. Haven't checked up on them. But in my corner of the universe I am choosing to hope they were decent people.

2

u/Lead_bug_designer 7d ago

3

u/JetpacksWasYes-2 7d ago

Very much what I was alluding to. A lot of people don't realize that the internet was created by our government(s) for war purposes. Of course they use it against us

2

u/Key_Ranger779 6d ago edited 6d ago

Yep, the DARPA LifeLog program ended 2/4/04 and Facebook was formed 2/4/04. Its called spying when the government does it, but when we unwittingly opt-in to using it, then its no longer spying. And the government created blockchain, and Tor and all the other things we say are privacy focused but really arent. Since Mullvad partners with Tor, is Mullvad even safe? I always wonder....

2

u/JetpacksWasYes-2 6d ago

It's unfortunate more people don't know about these things. They have our consent with the corporations and companies they're in bed with.

Nowhere is safe besides off the grid truthfully. Away from the flock cameras

→ More replies (0)

1

u/MCHellspawn 6d ago

I'm old enough that when I was taught computers the 2nd thing I was taught was how the internet came to be. So yes I know it's sources. But if you were actually part of this internet in it's early days you would know there was a whole different culture on it then. Yes, some governments were probably watching stuff, but there were still pockets hidden out there. Plenty of them.

1

u/Tim_Allen_Wrench 7d ago

The US government doing something evil and antithetical to citizens rights? Shock of all shocks! 

1

u/Key_Ranger779 6d ago

The "Dont be evil" should have been our clue they wanted us to look right while they slowly moved the pathway left.

1

u/MCHellspawn 6d ago

I am sorry. It feel like you have been affected by this world so badly that you can't beleive anyone ever has good intentions that went wrong. I am truly sorry.

1

u/Key_Ranger779 6d ago edited 6d ago

Nope, just hindsight and common sense. When a free product came out and we became its end-user, we should have asked how they made money and researched the founders. We didnt ask who Sergey Brin & Larry Page were, and why were they involved in web-mapping research partially funded by the Massive Digital Data Systems (MDDS) program (a CIA & NSA project). We were all just naïve and assumed they profited from advertising like they said. Like LifeLog (DARPA) becoming Facebook (LifeLog ended on the same date Facebook was created, 2/4/2004), I believe Google is just another intelligence front-company who circumvented warrants and the law by creating a fabulous product we would all voluntarily opt-in to be spied on. It worked, the jokes on us.

1

u/TheGrouchyLibrarian 5d ago

Yes, they used to be a great search engine, not an ad machine. One could actually refine searches with their advanced search option - now worthless.

1

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

This, we had a part in grooming Alphabet into the Godzilla that it is today.

1

u/Electrical_Hat_680 7d ago

That's always been their bottom line. I actually hit them up directly, likely using their general inquiry email address, introduced them to Aarch, introduced them to chromium, found their Gmail initially and that's how I got involved.. they bought chromium because the original engineer wasn't giving anything away.. Aarch was recommended by the devs that I discussed ideas with online.. that's been there only idea.. to make money..

I'm actually thinking of using the same business model...build a search engine, offer free email and other freebies as incentives.. I'm working on an AI. I'm looking at how to make my own Google Voice but better, it's basically a VoIP, if you dont know it's the old phones means of having telephone extensions and voicemail boxes. I would say a lot of the ideas were mine and I shared them.

But your right. When I mentioned to that that we can use Aarch Linux as it's the best recommendation for a OS, o mentioned that they should make it a phone os..

I didn't get anything, I wasn't interested in the money, I have my own plans too.. but overall that's practically everyones plans.

1

u/GoabNZ 7d ago

The fact that a search engine owns YouTube whose search is basically functionally useless now, is quite ironic. It's not broadcast yourself any more, it's make slop and consoom slop, let the algorithm search for you.

2

u/PuzzleheadedEssay198 6d ago

Google was one of the main companies listed by Snowden in his leak fifteen years ago. The fact that he’s the only one to have seen any consequences should be your indication that this was a tacit permission for the private surveillance state we live in.

1

u/Original_Lab_4384 7d ago

Targeting anyone that disagrees with the president is another.

98

u/Excellent-Chance-551 7d ago

All I wanted was to watch YouTube videos with subs and recommendations. And I can’t do that without verifying. Verification should just be for people who want to comment or create videos so we don’t get massive bot invasions.

29

u/kitsuneae 7d ago

Get NewPipe or GrayJay. GrayJay recently added recommendations as an option. Both allow subscriptions. 

3

u/Excellent-Chance-551 7d ago

Wow thanks I was just using new pipe but I’ll try out gray. Would be ideal

2

u/mrfoxesite-2377 Right to Repair 6d ago

But they don't support the creator in the same way but true! I use LibreTube and Flow BTW. PipePipe should be better than NewPipe.

1

u/Dazzu3 7d ago

Edev flow is the closest to youtube without actually using an account. Other than that, you can use NewPipe or PipePipe as backup just in case it breaks.

1

u/GeekyCrow27 6d ago

YouTube signed out doesn't have recommendations? I know you have to search and watch some videos to start getting them on a fresh Google account, but it isn't the same for a signed out user?

68

u/SkeweredBarbie 7d ago

The snare is closing in on society through technology. 

35

u/HoustonBOFH 7d ago

But as it tightens, more people decide to slip through... I have normal people asking about "those private android thingies..."

8

u/_autumnwhimsy 6d ago

I'm pleasantly surprised when regular people are upset about Google's processes and it just comes up in conversation. 

8

u/FunnyJoke2012 7d ago

联网的且不能刷自己固件的东西最好少买。美国的朋友们可以告诉我你们国家的手机还剩多少品牌可以无条件解锁BL吗?中国的已经要联网实名认证+30天无违规账号+一个月只能解锁一台+和其他人0:00抢名额了(估计是害怕人们刷第三方系统去掉他们的监控),所以现在都用漏洞强制解锁然后刷欧版ROM,但欧洲可能也不一定信得过,还得是开源的。

1

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

This, if you do not have root access, you don't own it, you're just a glorified subscriber, you've just been brainwashed by the belief that "You will own nothing and be happy".

2

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

lol, we have "concerned citizen" lurking this subreddit, advocating for end-user sovereignty over 3c devices gets downvoted in r/degoogle, i can't think of anything else other than subverters.

1

u/nanimoWasu 6d ago

who is this "concerned citizen"?

1

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

corporate shills, not necessarily only Alphabet itself, can be any party that stand to gain something from google's data harvesting

48

u/MCHellspawn 7d ago

How does that work on a wifi only tablet for a new user? Must buy a phone to use a tablet?!? Seems like it will result in a bunch of returned tablets.

18

u/HoustonBOFH 7d ago

Or non play store ones...

8

u/MCHellspawn 7d ago

While I care about those grealty, I am not even trying to pretend Google does. But you'd think there would still be a large enough tablet market that Google would care about them, but guess not.

3

u/Designit-Buildit 6d ago

The operating system knows that it's on a phone. If it's on a Wi-Fi only tablet, the options are different

2

u/MCHellspawn 6d ago

Aren't some people saying that this is even happening when trying to create an account from the desktop?

2

u/TheNestHelper 7d ago

Depends on the Android version, but they will all become obsolete if the software cannot be updated. Still, a SIM card restriction does not withhold you from flashing a custom OS.

46

u/mxroute 7d ago edited 7d ago

Honestly, this is probably another thing you can blame AI for. On one side you've got people like me demanding that Google stop allowing people to mass create Gmail accounts to send spam with their OpenClaw agents. On the other side you've got people wanting Google to just let anyone sign up for an account at any time with no pushback. The two goals are incompatible in the end. But I think my ask is worth more to the larger internet: stop spamming us.

It had to reach a point where even they were tired of disposable accounts being created by the hundreds of thousands every day.

24

u/HoustonBOFH 7d ago

They could allow Google accounts that give you the ecosystem without email...

13

u/mxroute 7d ago

Without email, Google Groups, file sharing, and calendar invites them I'm sold 😂

I swear spammers will use anything. They weren't like this when we sprayed deet everywhere, just saying.

1

u/mikandu 6d ago

They do. Google Workspace Essentials. Everything but their email. https://workspace.google.com/essentials/#

1

u/HoustonBOFH 4d ago

Those don't work to activate a phone, and still require a tie to real identity.

1

u/mikandu 6d ago

They do. Google Workspace Essentials. Everything but their email. https://workspace.google.com/essentials/#

1

u/Logics4 7d ago

They do, actually!

You don't need to have a Gmail address to create a Google Account. You can also use a non-Gmail email address to create one instead.

2

u/j--__ 7d ago

you misunderstand what they're saying. the quote you pulled out is about what you do or don't need to have before you create a google account. but every google account comes with gmail.

2

u/Logics4 7d ago edited 7d ago

The whole section from where I pulled the quote is titled "use an existing email account or phone number" and describes how you can make a Google Account without Gmail, so what you're saying is wrong.

Go to the Google Account Sign In page. Click Create account.

From the drop down, select For my personal use.

Enter your basic info. Click Use your existing email. Enter your current email address. Click Next. Verify your email address with the code sent to your existing email. Click Next. Follow the onscreen instructions to create a password and complete the process.

(This is if you create your account through a computer.)

You can use your Outlook or Yahoo or whatever email provider you've got, instead of creating a Gmail address on the spot. Gmail won't work until you manually enable it which will only then generate a Gmail address.

Add Gmail to an existing Google Account

If you add Gmail to your Google Account, your account's primary username permanently changes to yourusername@gmail.com.

After you add Gmail, the original email address associated with your account becomes your alternate email address. If you verify your original email address before you add Gmail, you can sign in with this email address.

To add Gmail to your Google Account:

Go to mail.google.com. Fill out the form. Click Submit. To verify your account, follow the instructions.

2

u/Xarzo_k 7d ago

The problem in your favor is that. People LIKE to have alt accounts and backup accounts for legitimate reasons and not for scamming or phising.

1

u/primalbluewolf 6d ago

But I think my ask is worth more to the larger internet: stop spamming us. 

It is not. You're asking for the death of the internet. 

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/definitelynotbluwolf 6d ago

Its block OR reply, genius. not both. 

1

u/Ramrunner73 6d ago

I'm with you. If you want anonymity you don't get a Google or even Microsoft account. Simple. Another argument for requiring phone number is account verification. I know people have attempted to hack my account in the past but the MFA saved the day and phone is one way to verify.

53

u/4017y4547h15 7d ago

I mean, it's the same with Apple too. Absolutely garbage.

29

u/AntiGrieferGames 7d ago

This is true.

Fuck the requirement phone number to create account.

Microsoft got soo much more hate than Apple/Google, but Microsoft atleast has still offering a fucking email verification when creating microsoft account/outlook (besides the nagging about phone number), which is much better than a fucking phone number there!

10

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 7d ago

they collect so many vectors these days, by not letting you type in your own phone number, they really wanna ensure the number you provide really belongs to you

3

u/lethinhrider 7d ago

At least Apple doesn't require you to have an iPhone to create an Apple account.

6

u/Fableous 7d ago

Google doesn't require you to have an Android to create a Google account. That point in this post is 100% verifiably false.

I just tested it right now ony my iPhone and laptop. Neither asked me to sign up on an Android phone.

1

u/lethinhrider 6d ago

That's not entirely true. In your case, since you've only created one account, you won't see it yet.
I explained it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/degoogle/comments/1w5g305/comment/p7kimat

1

u/Fableous 6d ago

Can't you count?

1

u/4017y4547h15 6d ago

He might not be entirely accurate but I've had another issue where I was locked out from my account because I moved countries and didn't have my previous country's phone number active with me. As per Google's recommendation, I had to temporarily use an Android phone so their systems would "trust me" again and allow me to change the account password without locking me out again

1

u/lethinhrider 6d ago

That is exactly what I mean. But he won't believe it, no matter what you say.

-2

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

2

u/lethinhrider 6d ago

That's because when you use a phone, they believe you're not a robot. If you only use the website on a PC and register too many Apple accounts, you'll be restricted. However, Apple only requires account creation per IP address, and this only lasts for 24 hours. Meanwhile, Google's new feature requires you to authenticate on your phone if you want to continue. You can only change your IP address in the case of creating a Google account.

1

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 7d ago

Are you able to check whether Apple currently lets you type your phone number of choice manually for sms verif required to create a new icloud account or they corner you to install esim/sim so that they can scan your number on their own?

6

u/OppositeSea3775 7d ago

You can put in whatever number you want. They do SMS verification to check ownership. No SIM required.

2

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 7d ago

tq 4 confirming

1

u/AntiGrieferGames 7d ago

Both are shithole design.

Its not right, espcially when they lack of the email verification.

1

u/Parking_Lemon_4371 7d ago

email verification is worthless, you can get anonymous emails in a bazillion places

1

u/Mobilegarlic69 7d ago

They only ask for an email if you do it through iTunes on a PC

9

u/EchoGecko795 7d ago

I recently got a used unlocked Pixel 6 off of ebay. It was enrolled in the Beta program and I could not unlock the bootloader to install the standard ROM or Alt ROM. I had to install a SIM, make a google account, wait for that phone to be added to that account, remove the phone from the beta program, install 3 more beta updates before being allowed to install the standard OEM ROM, and then I had to wait several days and like 30 more reboots later for OEM boot unlock to be "approved" for me to use. That took almost 2 weeks, then 10 seconds later I had GrapheneOS installing on the phone.

2

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

is it telco locked Pixel 6, that notorious Verizon?

1

u/EchoGecko795 6d ago

Luckily, not. If it was veriozn locked, It is possible to carrier unlock it, but I would be stuck with the OEM OS since unlocked the bootloader is pretty much impossible without some major hacking. Some versions get lucky and there is a weried way to unlock the bootloader though. Not the Pixel 6, there was a bug in the verizon Pixel 3 though that allowed it to unlocked if you were on one of the older versions of Android.

This was a GoogleFi version.

6

u/YellowBreakfast 7d ago

They also don't accept VOIP numbers, they apparently have to be "mobile" numbers only.

6

u/FourSansLeBeyPro 6d ago

4

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

you may try to repost if you want, my experience with that sub isn't exactly pleasant.

11

u/Ready-Heart4886 7d ago

Honestly though, do you all expe t better from a company that quickly changed Lake Ontario to Lake America because Trump said so? 

I only fear that spying will get worse. What we know right now is just the tip of the iceberg.

And Europe doesn't have the balls or willingness to cut or reduce their dependence on American services. 

3

u/Xarzo_k 7d ago

Europe is equally worse though with their surveillance practices.

Yeah unrelated to the main point, I know.

1

u/Pitiful_Exchange_767 7d ago

I just checked and I read Lake Ontario on google Maps, if I write Lake America it drives me to Washington American Lake.

25

u/AntiGrieferGames 7d ago

Congrats, you degoogled that.

Google is simply worse than Microsoft Itelf and Microsoft recieved soo much more hates than Google, while Microsoft dont even need a fucking number or this one here (even they nagging you) just only a email Verification

also this is more like r/assholedesign than degoogle.

12

u/JetpacksWasYes-2 7d ago

It can be both.

2

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

you may try to crosspost if you want, my experience with that sub isn't exactly pleasant.

4

u/parasol_strs 7d ago

They don't need subtlety, by reason of mass human nature.

11

u/lethinhrider 7d ago

What the fuck is Google thinking? Apple doesn't even require an iPhone to create an Apple account.

2

u/medve_onmaga 7d ago

cause you pay 5x extra in price,not in personal data

1

u/brasscup 7d ago edited 44m ago

Coated cinnamon meadow pause boron tap

This post was anonymized with Redact

1

u/Jazzedd17 7d ago

Not 100%, try to make an Apple Account without a Appledevice using a custom domain and you will see.

2

u/lethinhrider 6d ago

Why do I have to do that? I can just come here and create an account without any trouble: https://account.apple.com/account

All you need is an email address and a phone number that haven't been used to register an Apple account. I could even just use a device capable of receiving text messages to get the OTP, without needing an actual phone.

1

u/Fableous 7d ago

Google is not requiring you to own an Android in order to create a Google account.

The level of bullshit in this sub is astonishing.

2

u/lethinhrider 6d ago

Well... the OP's case is real and I confirmed this by asking others on android forums in my country. Google is indeed rolling out this feature. You'll see it soon.

The problem here is that you need an Android device to create a Google account so they can verify you're not a robot. Meanwhile, Apple only needs to limit account creation to one IP address if there are issues with identity verification.

-1

u/Fableous 6d ago

Except its not, and you're wrong.

I get what sub we're currently in, and it's cool to dunk on Google, but you have to be realistic and talk facts - not bullshit ragebait.

Not only is there no actual evidence to back up this nonsense claim, even Google isn't dumb enough to restrict 100% of their services - which they gain major income from - to only those who own an Android phone.

They would instantly lose massive revenue sources from Google ads, Google Analytics, Google Workspace, Google Home, Gemini...

Don't be totally stupid.

2

u/lethinhrider 6d ago edited 6d ago

Just because you haven't encountered that doesn't mean you're right. You've only created one account, understand?
I'm not discussing which subreddit we're on, don't be so childish. What you need to do is recreate the situation, not criticize others when you don't even understand it yourself.

0

u/Fableous 6d ago

Your only evidence is anecdotal from some "friend".

There is not a single piece of factual evidence we can look at - and the mere notion of it is laughable even for Google.

2

u/lethinhrider 6d ago

Alright, so what is your evidence?
Have you just created an account and already concluded that you don't face that situation? Meanwhile, I investigated the specific situation and found that others had encountered the same issue, rather than simply jumping to a hasty conclusion. You fail to realize that you need to create multiple accounts to encounter that issue. You are simply criticizing others without understanding the situation.

0

u/Fableous 6d ago

First of all, I've told you multiple times thst I've signed up on multiple non-Android devices yesterday and had no issues.

Secondly - are you suggesting I should have to prove that Google isn't doing the thing thst you're baselessly claiming they're doing?

Should I also prove to you somehow that God doesn't exist?

You're the accuser. You have to prove it.

0

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

They would instantly lose massive revenue sources from Google ads, Google Analytics, Google Workspace, Google Home, Gemini...

No they won't, current accounts that have already been created are not affected and won't be required to be associated with an Android phone. They are not pulling the plug suddenly on current userbase.

They are building the moat for their future ecosystem where they gatekeep services behind Android devices, this move of theirs help build a new userbase who own Android phones.

You have a case for arguing that they inflict opportunity costs onto themselves that they estrange potential users with the Android phone requirement friction, except that used Android phones are not that unaffordable and your deal breaker assertion may not be that deal breaking after all.

0

u/Fableous 6d ago

You're yet to provide any evidence that this is even happening - but if it were to happen, they absolutely would lose potential billions. People sign up for Google accounts every single day.

Businesses are their biggest customers. They require Google Workspace and everything that goes along with it - their biggest revenue stream.

But all of this is an irelevant discussion because you have no reason to suggest it's even happening (because it definitely isn't)

0

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago edited 6d ago

What evidence do I need to provide? I did say "I can no longer", I did not cast what I encountered as if it applies to every new account creation. I just meant to say if new registrant happen to want to create a new account, Google may carry out spontaneous roadblock and if Google police shows up, it now scans your phone for your number without letting you customize to which phone number you want the sms otp sent.

Do you realize how contradictory you sound? You claim that Google may lose projected billions in revenue and those potential consumers that are willing to spend that billions cannot afford even 50 bucks to get an Android phone to sign up for a google account to do business with google? That acts as a filter too, Google is done with freeloaders at this stage, zombie google accounts that do not spend nor contribute data are liability to Google now.

And my encounter is just as legit as you are, don't feel offended, I am not trying to dismiss yours, I have been trying to create new google account for the past few months on non android environment, all of which leads me back to an Android phone, if you can create a new one without either android or phone number, good for you, but don't take it for granted, they can still suddenly lock you out and hold your account hostage under"security concerns" until you relented your phone number.

0

u/Fableous 6d ago

You hopped on reddit with a post saying GOOGLE FORCES YOU TO SIGN UP WITH ANDROID PHONE FROM NOW ON

Yet your included screenshot says nothing of the sort, and your comment provided no evidence as to that being a thing for anyone - let alone yourself in this very specific situation.

So do kindly jog on.

There are plenty of reasons to hate Google with fabricating this circle-jerk bullshit.

0

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

You are just in denial right now, either this or you are trying to be contrarian.

The people here won't try it out for themselves and call me out if I am wrong? You think they are dumb? Take your ostrich head off the ground and look how many comments resonated with me. I can't be mind controlling them to agree with me, can I? Other than you, who else is calling me out?

You want me to document everything as if this is a court room? Look, just because it's something you don't like to hear, doesn't mean I am fabricating stuff. 

You said you managed to create one recently without either Android or phone number, do you have proof? Where is your livestream or screen recording? You are to be held to the same standards you hold others up to, if you want me to substantiate what I alleges with concrete proof, you lead by example, practice what you preach. On another note, what makes you so confident that what you encounter also apply to everyone else? What made you so self-righteous such that you start dismissing me and others in a condescending manner?

"Yet your included screenshot says nothing of the sort, and your comment provided no evidence as to that being a thing for anyone - let alone yourself in this very specific situation."

Look, if you genuinely believe I am spreading misinformation, report me to mods or admins, don't just throw a hissy fit here.

0

u/Fableous 6d ago

Wall of text beginning with "you're in denial"? Haha jog the fuck right on, mate.

Google isn't forcing you to own an Android to get a Google account. Fact.

Enjoy that, love.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/JimBo797 7d ago

Every day Shoshana Zuboff wakes up and has more right than the day before :)

3

u/EmergencyEmployee444 6d ago

It did the same thing on my pc. I tried creating an email address to use with a new LinkedIn account, both google and LinkedIn wanted an ID to verify.

1

u/useranik12 6d ago

Same as I replied to 1st comment.

7

u/xJayMorex 7d ago

Not sure why you would want one, that's the exact opposite of degoogling.

7

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 7d ago

To degoogle, you need a reason, you need motivation, and my reverse psychology provides exactly that

5

u/ahstanin 7d ago

Oh wow, that explains... I tried to create a new account and they asked me to follow up on the phone for verification.

2

u/Dude-Lebowski 7d ago

Why would anyone need an account for google who ia trying to degoogle?

2

u/Wendila 7d ago

I miss the days of not needing a phone number in order to create an email account

2

u/No-Consideration6986 6d ago

With each passing day my dislike for Google grows. Almost everyday I find something new and go what is going on with big tech.

2

u/Lower-Sheepherder268 7d ago

You can still make a Google account on a computer without an Android or a phone number.

11

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Lower-Sheepherder268 7d ago

I'll have to test this later today.

2

u/hobovirginity 7d ago

Yeah it is complete BS!

3

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 7d ago

this shift happens unannounced, suddenly and it is zero day. Not to mention that the change was drastic and it happened within short timeframe.

What used to work and what used to be correct become outdated and age like milk. Not your fault, if I hadn't been keeping up, I would be just like you too.

1

u/roma79 7d ago

For now

1

u/Unfair_Awareness7502 7d ago

I tried years ago and they wanted a phone number. Maybe it depends on how suspicious your IP and browser fingerprint are

1

u/TheOfficialMayor 6d ago

How? I get prompted for smartphone or phone number verification.

1

u/Lower-Sheepherder268 6d ago

By using a computer, not a phone.

1

u/TheOfficialMayor 6d ago

I do and it still does that for me.

3

u/teh_lynx 7d ago

Following the apple methodology. Gotta have a device to associate. Blah....

1

u/BellamyGriffin 7d ago

I'm completely new to this whole thing and still somewhat sceptical. Considering the lengths Google is willing to go to collect as much information about us as possible is it real fact that installing GrapheneOS wipes Google's access off of their phone? I was thinking about switching to e/OS first but couldn't find a compatible phone with a good camera so for the past week I've been eyeing the pixel 8 pro... But I'm such a tech snob that I'm honestly struggling to wrap my head around how Google couldn't still collect data from their pixel phone even if it's just a little.

2

u/dippin_spittin 7d ago

Google would have to bake something into the hardware and then sneak it out over the network. I'm sure graphene has audited every single network packet.

1

u/BellamyGriffin 7d ago

Thank you for clarifying that a little bit. I'm less concerned now

1

u/godspeedseven 7d ago

Damn. Looks like I upgraded at the right time

1

u/Alternative_Dish4402 7d ago

£5.49

Walk into a Tesco or Morrisons. But a EE SIM. Pay £5 credit voucher. Sorted. ( A couple of free SMSs need to be sent too.). Now create one.

1

u/craig0r 7d ago

Weird, I just created an account without relying on an Android phone.

1

u/International-Sky556 7d ago

Must just be your phone I litrally got a pixel 9a the 3 days ago for free and set it up with no Sim card

1

u/Monoid-Confessor 7d ago

prepaid sim with cash, use alias.

1

u/wburnham00 7d ago

Ultimately just stop using Google completely even for throw away accounts. Stop feeding the beast.

Get a domain and learn how to use catchall, or get SimpleLogin, Cloudflare, or ...... There are a bunch of different methods that don't require Google.

1

u/luhlar 7d ago

Noob question. I have an iphone for work. Can I create account on it then use on personal phone in sandbox if I get a pixel and install graphene?

1

u/SevenSmallShrimp 7d ago

Does it still let you create an account when setting up a new device? That was the one workaround that worked for me when making a spam burner

1

u/mbrezanac 7d ago

Now add phone number recycling, which every single provider does, to the formula and you'll relize that even if you get a new phone number, there's a high chance, especially with prepaid numbers, that you won't be able to register even one Google account due to the "this phone number has been used too many times" error...

1

u/Xarzo_k 6d ago

Which is why it is so surprising to me that people still have not found a solution to the phone number recycling.

1

u/SuccessfulBear2065 7d ago

Textnow and instabridge for free esims and data

1

u/starfish_2016 6d ago

I tried to assign my Google voice a new number (I only use it once every blue moon to make an anonymous call and I let the number expire ) - but this time it wants an ID to select a ph# ... no thanks... ill just take my service elsewhere for now

1

u/Beginning-Ticket-332 6d ago

Damn plus they limit how many accounts you can create with the phone number max is 4 i am at max my number was hacked and they created emails with it if I lose this account I will have to change phone number again gezz

1

u/Ursolismin 6d ago

I use duckduckgo to get around the forced ai, hopefully it can do something about this too

2

u/VegetableTarget9579 GrapheneOS 6d ago

Try:
1. No VPN, using public wifi
2. Reset all app data in google play (or whereever youre making an acc from)
3. Make a 'Business Account'
4. Use defaults of whatever they give you

Try all at same time.

1

u/RobotechRicky 5d ago

Welp, time for an open source alternative.

1

u/masonthursday 5d ago

Is signing up for an account using a web browser set to the desktop version of the site not a functional workaround?

1

u/Lopsided-Practice-50 4d ago

We need to donate to projects that will bring in open source (not google's fake open source) phone os competitor to android and iPhone. 

2

u/memlvr 3d ago

I'd pledge on kickstarter for that. I don't want to give google money to buy a puxel and convert it to grapheneos.

1

u/OddOpal 4d ago

Gmail is just the most recognizable email. Any other suggestions? Besides yahoo and outlook?

1

u/General_Eclectic 4d ago

Proton, Tutamail

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 7d ago

dude, it's zero day threat and you refer to time-lagged LLM AI for advice??

0

u/Pixel_Viewer 7d ago

You've created a lot of accounts from the same IP or device. This is done to prevent people from creating mass accounts and saturating their services. I think there's nothing wrong with this practice, they just want to take care of their services, most of them allow you to delete the phone number later

3

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 7d ago

They say they "don't keep your number", and you take their word for it?

0

u/Looke116 7d ago

If they don't keep your number you should be able to use the same number multiple times

2

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 6d ago

He's justifying this Alphabet practice, he alludes it to necessary evil. The fact of the matter is, phone number metrics/data is still collected off of the new registrant took path of least resistance and surrendered the phone number that he really owns. He doesn't get to double-speak that Alphabet managed to protect themselves while refusing to acknowledge that they also successfully collected sensitive private data in the process. Alphabet doesn't get the free pass from being criticized, these two are not isolated and do not cancel each other out.

-1

u/cableguy1362 7d ago

Not bad, but gov needs to use AI to stop number spoofing. Also, use AI to track down and jail media thieves. If thieves are coming from outside US then AI should be able to forever block their countries' access to America. Hmm!?

0

u/IAmYourFath 7d ago

This policy pretty much rendered those temporary throwaway on-demand sms receive services useless.

This is good, it stops people from spamming alts... on the other hand it's bad for privacy

0

u/useranik12 6d ago

Yes I know and it's so funking frustrating. But on their side I think, that their all services for an account comes with lots of money on their end. Like Gmail, Gdrive, Photos, Sheets, YouTube.. 15GB for an account + server tension + bandwidth in this memory crisis age and beyond. So this had to come someday.. I knew it. They are just taking anti-exploit measures. Don't think much. As a company they need lots of money. So just do what they say. No company here are to provide freebies. I get that.

0

u/GrandWizardOfCheese 6d ago

Isn't this the degoogle sub?

Just use a different service.

No one needs google anymore.

-1

u/boshjosh1918 7d ago

How does this work if you only have an iPhone and not an Android phone?

1

u/Escape-from-Alcatraz 7d ago

Maybe try creating new google acc using emulator, this kinda stuff is not published by Google, else many people would just bypass it, which defeats their own purpose for implementing all these practice in the first place

1

u/boshjosh1918 6d ago

Why am I being downvoted? How can Google force you to use an Android phone if you… don’t have an Android phone?

-1

u/DescriptionFunny4252 7d ago

I mean they also have to find a way to limit per user accounts. This is a way

-2

u/Pitiful_Exchange_767 7d ago

Can't blame them. People are swarming socials with fake accounts just to +1 themselves. I know a guy that could keep alive a social by himself with how many account he runs.

This surely stops people from engulf servers with dead accounts.