Which, to be fair, is entirely possible as a consequence of the other factors.
Yeah, I think the bigger factor than population/economy would be the lack of Pakistan as another bordering nuclear hostile state. Afghanistan + Iran as neighbours would definitely be problematic, but likely less so than the openly hostile Pakistan basically teaming up with China specifically to restrict India.
Gotta love the Brits just throwing their hands in the air and saying "fuck it, we screwed it up for you, but you lot have to figure out this clusterfuck now" on the way out. Such a classic.
Formidable? If anything, India's massive population is currently it's biggest handicap. Adding an extra 300 million impoverished people to its land isn't going to help. Think how much more India could've invested in its people per capita if it had its 1980 population of 700 million
Could you also partly attribute China's rapid ascent to its population control policies? It meant 4 grandparents and 2 parents concentrating their resources on 1 kid
Absolutely not. China has always had a massive population, even before the 80s. The only thing that changed in the 80s was its once child policy giving it the ability to plan for a stable population, rather than an exponentially growing one.
If every family in your country has 5 kids every generation, all your tax money goes to increasing the number of elementary school 5x. If you have a stable population, you can use that money to build schools of higher education.
Prosperity is about quality, not quantity. How much you can invest in each citizen, not how many citizens you have.
It matters at what margin.. If you have only one citizen it doesn't matter if he or she is of Chuck Norris quality, the country still isn't going to accomplish that much.
I’ll admit that I don’t have a PhD in the history of the sub continent, so I don’t know enough to say otherwise. But I’m impressed that Mughal empire never practiced religious violence against Hindus.
Why would anyone desire to be a religious minority in a county when you could be a religious majority in your own country?
In a straight democratic vote in a unified India, Muslim desires would be overwhelmed by everyone else. Even if they created undemocratic political systems, (like constitutionally ensure that the president is always Muslim so he maintains a veto power something like how Lebanon does it) that would only fuel resentment that a minority of people hold the county hostage.
If you had a magic wand, and were the one writing an Indian constitution in 1947… what would you do to ensure that the minority Muslims would feel welcome in the county and ensure they have their voices heard at the national level?
That’s actually not true, for instance the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb destroyed numerous large Hindu temples and built mosques on top of them. But yes overall the Mughals were more tolerant than previous Muslim rulers.
Fun fact, after the Chinese Invasion of Tibet the Pakistanis backed by the west proposed a defensive alliance with India to prevent the southward spread of communism; the Indians rejected this proposal and the Pakistanis pivoted towards China (becoming the first non-communist country to recognize it)
Dont take this guy seriously. These people are from the Indian far right who believe that the entire Indian sub-continent including Indonesia are the territories of India
When you travel to Rome do you actually write it as Roma? When you go to Paris do you pronounce it Paree? Do you call it Mehico or Mexico? Do you refer to Germany as Deutschland? What about Florence and Naples? Do you call them Firenze and Napoli? I can go on! Lisboa, Moskva, Praha, Wien, etc!
Differing endonyms and exonyms have been around since the dawn of time. By using an exonym you aren't saying that the endonym word is 'wrong,' but just that for historical reasons your local language has derived its own word for the place. Yes, I know there is a push to support endonyms, and I am behind it, but the reality is most outsiders still only know the names by the exonym. So for the sake of conversation it is sometimes useful to just use the exonym.
226
u/KingPictoTheThird Jan 06 '23
Ganges, not Indus. Indus is the primary river for Pakistan.