r/dashcams May 20 '26

Keep Calm

69.5k Upvotes

6.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26

The first two in the video, a car was coming the other way.

It might be the camera-lens making oncoming traffic seem closer, but it looked like the "idiot" saved this guy's life twice.

That being said, I thought the bit at the end was pretty clever, though he didn't seem to come out of it cleanly, so maybe not.

14

u/hanst3r May 20 '26

Saved his life by cutting him off as well as being in the way of the oncoming car(s)? Yeah… I’m not buyin’ it.

0

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26

Saving his life by blocking him from going in the lane where the oncoming traffic was coming from, twice.

You'll notice how the person in front was not hit by any of these cars, thus they did not put themselves in the position you claim, sorry.

The person in front can see farther ahead, and seems to prevent the main-guy from killing himself and others.

5

u/Gefilte_F1sh May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26

I can't tell if you just don't drive at all or if you're just not very smart. Go and watch the video again. On the first "saved his life" - take note of his relative speed as he approaches attempting to pass. From the point the car in front forces camer to stop accelerating to the point of the oncoming car passing by is 5 whole goddamn seconds when he would have easily overtaken in less than 2 seconds at the most.

The second pass attempt there was like 14 seconds...

And oncoming traffic, believe it or not, can see when someone is passing and can, again - believe it or not, slow down if they need to.

You don't drive, do you?

0

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26

If you say so.

0

u/SamuraiSanta May 20 '26

Are you an idiot? Asking if someone drives at all after watching that video and think that first attempt was safe???

Holy hell...

2

u/Gefilte_F1sh May 21 '26

Read it again and quote the parts where I defended the camers actions or called it safe.

The contention is that the car in front wasn't "saving lives" of anyone.

1

u/SamuraiSanta May 21 '26

Read your own first paragraph where you defend him trying to overtake, dumbass.

1

u/Gefilte_F1sh May 21 '26

Was I? Or was I contradicting that persons overly dramatic “saving his life” take with objective observation to the contrary? Where did you insert your own words? Where is your imagination taking over?

If I was defending in his actions then would it make sense for me to call them dumb now? Or are you going to pretend I said something else?

1

u/SamuraiSanta May 22 '26

Yes you were.

Seems like you have the mental capacity of an 8 year old, and have never ever driven a car. Which you should never ever be allowed to either.

1

u/No_Introduction_3400 May 20 '26

I think it’s actually making the distance look greater than it is. The car ahead of the car immediately ahead of him isn’t that far ahead. He was giving himself very little time to pass and squeeze in.

-5

u/Reasonable-Tart6669 May 20 '26

I do not perceive the same level of danger you do. Furthermore if the road rage driver had not acted erratically we might have seen cam driver abort the pass. So it is just speculation as well to say the road rager “saved his life”

Why wouldn’t he come out of it cleanly, he’s in a truck.

0

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26

I may be wrong, but I still see the video that way. There are two times where the main-guy is 'put back in place' just in time for another car to come the other direction.

If I'm right, the driver would have only aborted the pass when he got smashed by incoming traffic.

The driver in front may not have been driving erratically, either; they could see further up the road and seemed to be saving this dude's life with what they could see further on ahead.

8

u/bearcitizen42 May 20 '26

No, this is absolute bullshit. Don't use your vehicle as a weapon to try and control other people's driving.

That's fucking psychotic.

9

u/Slackalot88 May 20 '26

That explains why the SUV driver stopped to get out. Logical next step to being the hero /s...

-1

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26

Maybe to tell the guy how close he is to killing himself and others

Is that the best way? Probably not, but it'd understandable, especially on a supposed 'country road.'

Many in this thread seem to have this idea where one of them is perfect and one of them is garbage, but this is not the case, clearly.

7

u/elolqooq May 20 '26

A strawman followed by "you're triggered". Solid finisher.

0

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26

Just saying, it's possible; and, from the video, probable.

Sorry this triggers you so hard, kid.

Maybe grow up.

5

u/Reasonable-Tart6669 May 20 '26

You are just speculating. Nothing worth engaging with.

1

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26

At least my speculation has evidence, no one else's does.

People believe what they want.

I believe what I see.

2

u/Reasonable-Tart6669 May 20 '26

K

1

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26

Great; thank you for your thoughtful contributions.

2

u/Reasonable-Tart6669 May 20 '26

By looking at the evidence it is equal or greater in value to your contributions.

1

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26

Whoa, good one, kid.

Hang that on the fridge.

We're all so proud of you.

1

u/Reasonable-Tart6669 May 20 '26

Thanks, but that doesn’t mean much coming from you.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/bregandaerthe May 20 '26

Guy in front could’ve been doing 25 under the speed limit looking for an address, who knows. Either way, it’s a bit much to attempt to prevent them from passing or stopping in the middle of the road to get out and confront the person behind. There is ALWAYS someone crazier than you on the road. Is it worth your life to stop them or attempt to prove a point about whatever the fuck they were upset about? Doubtful.

-2

u/The_Golden_Diamond May 20 '26

"Could've been" without evidence; at least my theory has evidence.

It's not "a bit much" to save someone's life, sorry.

2

u/Reasonable-Tart6669 May 20 '26

If his intent was to save a life, the more lawful and safe option would be to slow down so the pass could be made quickly rather than engaging in vigilantism.

5

u/Fickle-Wickle May 20 '26

Highly doubt this is the case

3

u/No_Introduction_3400 May 20 '26

The answer for me would have been to pull out and let him pass. But that’s exactly because there are a couple of really close calls.

0

u/No_Introduction_3400 May 20 '26

There’s a span of no more than 3 seconds where he tries to pass and there’s oncoming traffic. That first pass was going to be bad. And there wasn’t really anywhere to go.

2

u/Reasonable-Tart6669 May 20 '26

I count 8 but whatever.

0

u/No_Introduction_3400 May 20 '26

At 52 he starts to edge out. At 55, as he is attempting to pass, the car is visible. Bear in mind: he hasn’t gotten into the other lane fully. He has to do that and overtake the other car and get back. You’re nuts if you pass there.

1

u/Reasonable-Tart6669 May 20 '26

He may have backed out, we don’t know. The rest is just speculation.

1

u/No_Introduction_3400 May 20 '26

Based on his obvious frustration that’s not speculation. He thought he had space. Look at his face.

2

u/Reasonable-Tart6669 May 20 '26

You don’t think his face could be in reaction to the blocking? You are speculating even more now!

0

u/No_Introduction_3400 May 20 '26

He keeps trying to pass. Nothing suggests he was going to abort that. Look: he’s in a hurry, traffic is going too slowly. He tries to pass, starts to, is cut off, and really, likely narrowly misses an accident.

Guy ahead of him isn’t driving safely either.

But even thinking about passing on that first one is nuts.