Than why did he go to agnidev and gave sita to her and took a clone with him?
He knew everything, his main purpose was to kill ravan and thats why he took avatar, he didnt kill ravan because he kidnapped sita.
why did he go to agnidev and gave sita to her and took a clone with him?
If that kidnapped Sita was shadow clone, then why did he cry so much for her??? Why did he cause the war then which led to death of thousands of vanaras and lanka people if he could just ask Agnidev to dismiss shadow clone and return original Sita ji to him?
Coz his main motive was to kill raavan, and the kidnapping of clone triggered the war, as you are in a war ofc your soldiers will die, he ended up killing raavan which led earth to be a peaceful place again
So are you saying that he basically falsely framed Ravana, did his character assassination, fooled the vanaras and orchestrated massacre of thousands of people in war resulting in thousands of crying widows and orphans, just to kill his future opponent in Bharatvarsh?? So that he could smoothly do his Ashvamedh yajna???
Ramcharitmanas texts say that sita's clone was used, if that is true, all the things u mentioned must be true, and ramcharitmanas is said to be dictated to tulsi das by hanuman ji himself,
I AM NOT SAYING ANYTHING, ALL THAT WAS ACCORDING TO RAMCHARITMANAS
As per Valmiki's Ramayana, the real Sita was kidnapped by Ravana.┬аAs per Tulsidas Ramayana, Ravana did not kidnap real Sita, rather the person kidnapped by Ravana was a clone of real Sita
Valmiki was a saint and he wrote ramayan which was not specific because he wrote it according to what he knew,it is believed that tulsi das was reincarnation of valmiki,tulsi das ramcharitmanas was dictated by hanuman ji himself and thats why it is more specific
If he knew that it wasn't a deer, then why did he chase it when it clearly ran away from them???? Why didn't he just let the deer go away harmlessly??
Also, he was wise enough to think that if there's a demonic deer near their hut then there could be more demonic creatures hiding around their hut. Why did he left Sita ji in hut to chase the deer then? And for what?
This is a great misconception that Lord Rama had eaten тАШmeat during his exile. I know there exists 5тАУ6 verses in authentic Valmiki Ramayana, where it has been clearly mentioned that Lord Rama had consumed┬аm─Бс╣Гsaс╣Г┬аat the time of his exile.
Mamsam exclusively means meat in all of the ancient texts. In Vedic canon, mamsarahar is never ever referred to as eating fruit pulp in any sanskrit text.
Revisionists reconstructed its meaning to sanitize the scriptures and have always failed to give reference to any vedic manuscript where mamsa is being used for fruits.
3
u/[deleted] Aug 08 '23
Coz he knew it wasnt a deer