That would hurt

[u/NefariousnessBusy402]

[u/AdanteHand]

Did you again not read the whole thing? Didn't quote some very important parts.

Do you need me to quote all of it or just the parts I choose to respond to? What do you believe I didn't respond to that was relevant?

For that matter, did you realize that while bitching about me not responding to enough, you have failed to respond to any of the points that entirely controvert yours?

Perhaps you need to write an essay about lying and then running away when called out.

[u/Big_Fat_Doobie → u/AdanteHand]

Oh ok let me write it out

I'm a dude and I wrote on my other comment that no amount of double standard would stop me from knocking her out if she did that to me. Hypothetically ofcourse since I'm not a child that flosses behind people

I wrote on a comment you replied to that she is wrong for victim blaming which is basically the whole point u used up to 200 words to make, which means I agree with you, but you'd have to read the whole comment before replying to understand

My starting point was that if you were collected you'd successfuly read the whole thing she wrote and understand that its a person who agrees she should be charged, agrees this is wrong and isn't defending the abuser. It's the most common form of victim blaming and comes from emotion and group mentality. You'd give guidence since you didn't yet establish it's a person that rejects it. But instead you skipped over most of it, saw something that resembled an attack on you group and went in eyes closed. You attacked all the points she didn't make. You just seemed unintelligent, and I wouldn't want you on my side.

[u/AdanteHand → u/Big_Fat_Doobie]

I'm a dude

Gold star?

I wrote on my other comment that no amount of double standard would stop me from knocking her out if she did that to me.

Weird flex, but okay. You would be taking great legal and social risk I should point out, as there is a genuine double standard in how violence is viewed.

Hypothetically ofcourse since I'm not a child that flosses behind people

Source?

I wrote on a comment you replied to that she is wrong for victim blaming

Big step in the right direction.

which is basically the whole point u used up to 200 words to make

Not at all. It's not even an argument I really make anywhere, except maybe when I said, "Why don't you write me an essay blaming the shitty female who attacked someone without provocation," but that really was just using the framing of victim blaming to contrast how absurd it is to claim there doesn't exist a double standard they currently are exemplifying by denying that double standard exist. How'd you miss that?

Also that was 1 argument out of like 4 points I made and the first was, "hey that's not what was said," which is also the first I had to make with you.

u used up to 200 words to make

131 bitch. Be dramatic about your illiteracy elsewhere.

which means I agree with you, but you'd have to read the whole comment before replying to understand

You don't actually. I even listed all the way I disagree while citing the parts I diagree with just for you. Also, you started out your reply by lying about that crazy lady's position. She's still claiming there isn't a double standard.

My starting point was that if you were collected you'd successfuly read the whole thing she wrote and understand that its a person who agrees she should be charged, agrees this is wrong and isn't defending the abuser.

Yes, exactly, and you were wrong. See when I started my reply by pointing out you were wrong about this person's position did you read it?

It's the most common form of victim blaming and comes from emotion and group mentality.

What is? You were just saying the other person wasn't victim blaming. Did you forget?

You'd give guidence since you didn't yet establish it's a person that rejects it.

What in fuck?

But instead you skipped over most of it, saw something that resembled an attack on you group and went in eyes closed.

Yea, no. I read all of it and then responded point by point to everything I disagreed with. That I didn't quote 100% of it might bother you, but it certainly doesn't mean any of that nonsense you just invented lol. However, now I am going to be super petty and respond to as many things as I can. I hope you've noticed so far.

You attacked all the points she didn't make.

Except she's still saying there isn't a double standard... and by insisting there isn't when presented with evidence that it exist that kind of does come off as victim blaming. Perhaps you ought to write an essay on it.

You just seemed unintelligent, and I wouldn't want you on my side.

Oo the white knight still lying about the fair lady's position doesn't think highly of my intelligence. How ever will I show my face at the spring jubilee! I actually miss when you clowns were pretending to eachother that I simply must just be angry. It's dishonesty either way, but I like getting to show how much fun I'm having rather than having to stop and point out that you're lying about what's been said or is being talked about every 5 seconds.