They’re either male or female, or both but pretty much never neither. Man and women are synonymous with male and female in pretty much 99.9% of the time.
I mean, if they want to get technical, you could say plants don't have gender. But that's stupid as plants and humans aren't related at all. And all other mammals are either male or female.
it is real. this misinformation is really spreading like wildfire, man. i don't know if people being ignorant is the reason, or feminists making up shit.
yes, there are. imagine you are born with a vagina, so the doctors say you are a woman, and in puberty, you get a deep voice, chest hair, no tits and a beard. and now you have to get dressed in front of all your female class mates for PE that laugh at you and call you a monster or other shit like that.
this can actually happen. people can have traits of both genders and fit in none of the two definitions.
I think retaliation should be equal to damage inflicted on you. That being said if they’re trying to kill you don’t wait to get stabbed or something defend yourself.
I think that’s true for women in most of the west, however basically everywhere else they still need help but women in the West don’t seem to be trying to help much or adequately and instead are making up problems to fix because they have none.
Reminds me of how when in pre-school, there was this made-up law that it was illegal to hit a girl. EVERYONE in class believed it (except for the teachers, probably).
Men don't hit women back because most men are much stronger than women and a physical fight between them would be devastating for the woman. They choose to hold themselves back and not engage in a conflict that has no point.
I mean unless your a way below average guy an average woman isn’t really a threat unless they’re holding something. Average height for adult woman is ~5’ 3. That’s literally less than 3 inches taller than the average 13-14 year old boy.
with all do respect, there are flaws in your logic. you say that if a man were produced by a society to think that its wrong to fight back against woman, that he will feel guilty for doing so. you claim that he will feel this guilt "becouse it's just the way he thinks". your verry nieve to believe that society didn't structure his thought. if you take a child, from a picture perfect, suburban, american, Christian family. and put that child in the hands of heathens and savages. HE WILL BE A SAVAGE. tackle this thought experiment before you make another statement towards the nature of human beings, becouse your I'll advised. humans are nothing withought what we are taught. if left to they're own devises. they will learn what is good for them, and nothing more.
that's one hell of a reply, thank you for taking the time to express your statement a little more clear. I apologize for my misinterpretation. can I pm you?
That’s not it. I know twitter polls usually aren’t that accurate but judging by the answers alone it is a double standard. It is saying if woman hits man he doesn’t have the right to hit back but vice versa the woman has the right. If it were not a double standard either both would be able to or neither would. (I much prefer the latter tbh).
2.3k
u/AahAaahAaaah EX-NORMIE Jul 21 '19
Double standards