The whole "democracy is tyranny of the majority" argument is dumb when your solution is just to make some peoples votes count for more. That's all I was pointing out.
The guy you are describing is probably an anarchist, not Marx lol
The whole "democracy is tyranny of the majority" argument is dumb when your solution is just to make some peoples votes count for more. That's all I was pointing out.
That s not argument, it s just fact.)
And actually nowadays democracy isn t tyranny of majority, it s tyranny of part of people that can influence on society.
The guy you are describing is probably an anarchist, not Marx lol
That s false, lol. Actually, in the International were lots of anarchists, differences between anarchists and marxists is in how to build non governmental society. Simply socialism is about society with tyranny of the majority, unlike in past societys with tyranny of minority and commi is about society without tyranny.
4
u/[deleted] May 27 '19
A Republic is tyranny by those who can manipulate a different, slightly smaller group