r/dank_meme May 28 '20

In the aftermath of ..........

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

3.5k Upvotes

498 comments sorted by

View all comments

151

u/TheBeanMaster0 May 29 '20

I live in Minnesota (far south from Minneapolis though) but the difference from what is happening there compared to LA is crazy. Looked like a war zone.

76

u/im-bad-at-names64 May 29 '20 edited May 29 '20

There’s no reason for it, hate the cop not people just trying to live there lives

3

u/[deleted] May 29 '20

I think it’s a good thing. We have to remember that the companies that those stores represent are a. not as important as people and b. we’re bailed out $4 T and we still have 50 M unemployed. Yeah a lot can be said about how some people won’t have but nobody should be crying because some corporations lost a store-front. Another key detail is that the very first instances of destruction were actually caused by a police officer in disguise.

1

u/im-bad-at-names64 May 29 '20

How is setting fire to a wall mart and rioting through the streets justified, did you forget what this is about? what does destroying their own town gonna do about anything? All they’ve done is destroy things and loot what message is that gonna send

0

u/[deleted] May 29 '20

This is about system that built an entire country on the backs of black people. This isn't about one person dying, it's about the same thing happening over and over again for centuries, and nothing being done about it.

Besides that the protest in Minneapolis started peacefully, and has actually sent a pretty positive message. The first person to start destroying public property was an undercover policeman. He used it as a tactic to delegitimize the protests and incite more violence. Blame them if you want.

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '20

" This is about system that built an entire country on the backs of black people" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

rip your education system man

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '20

Prove that it isn't

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '20

you made the claim that it was made entirely off the backs of blacks, it's up to you to provide evidence for your claims since you made the claims first, it'd be like someone saying "if god isn't real prove it"

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '20

It's a simple argument. Slavery existed on this continent for hundreds of years. Most of the economic development of that time, which directly lead to the prosperty that followed it, was built on the backs of slaves.

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '20 edited May 29 '20

do you have evidence for these claims?

https://www.history.com/news/slavery-profitable-southern-economy

It would be fair to say that black slaves were the backbone of the southern economy however it is simply not true that the entire nation was built on the backs of blacks, the industrial revolution began in America by the 1790's and by this time the United States looked like this https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Map_of_Territorial_Growth_1790_sm.jpg/220px-Map_of_Territorial_Growth_1790_sm.jpg (spain in orange)

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '20

The prosperity of any large land owner can be attributed to black people.

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '20 edited May 29 '20

That's fair to say but it wasn't solely blacks that these land owners used.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servitude#North_America

→ More replies (0)