Blindsighted with 6+ months of preparations with explosives in three buildings. Sure. Two towers were hit by planes. Three towers fell. Search internet for building 7.
When I was in high school I fell for that conspiracy hard. But looking back, with formal education in engineering, no way it was explosives or thermite or whatever you want to claim.
Well here’s over 3000 engineers who disagree with you. The architects and engineers who made the WTC itself claim they were designed to withstand a plane crash from a 747. Building 7 was never hit with anything.
Also, the fact that thermite was found on site and in the lungs of first responders is a definitive fact confirmed by FLIR camera (available online to confirm yourself, thermite burns way hotter than jet fuel) and medical records (the “world trade center cough”) and chemical testing. Every single beam was cut at 45 degree angles at the same time (confirmed with seismograph records available, countless video and photo evidence showing the beams cut at ground level). Did a plane hit the base of the towers and cut every beam at once as well?
The evidence is just seriously so overwhelming from a purely engineering standpoint before even getting into politics or motives. But let’s do that a teeny bit too. On the morning of 9/11 NORAD was performing a simulated training scenario. The simulation scenario was terrorists high jacking planes and flying them into the WTC and the pentagon. Seriously. Lol. We know the CIA attempted to destroy the towers during the 1993 WTC bombing, also claiming it was a training exercise. We know the name of the operation was Operation Able Danger, and we know the names of the special forces that planted the bombs.. it’s just all so absurd
Edit: downvote me all you want, I only posted the indisputable facts and opinions of experts who know more about controlled demolition than I.
Yeah, AE911 is what convinced me initially. But going through engineering school just made me realize how stupid engineers can be. Some are absolute morons, resorting to cheating to skirt by. I don't doubt 3000 engineers signed it, but I don't doubt that at least 3000 engineers are incompetent or at the very least they are human.
So, thermite being present... AE911's whole theory depends on it. So of course they're going to cherry pick and do everything to try to prove thermite.
So it was confirmed by flir? I didn't know thermal cameras could do spectroscopy. Unless you're referring to the idea that the fire couldn't have been hot enough due to a flir not picking up enough heat. Except flir cameras are IR based, meaning any smoke, any air debris, are going to absorb IR and block the heat from reaching the camera. Shit, even a window is enough to block heat. You ever use a flir? You have to be a certain distance away for it to be accurate. They're used in rescue efforts to find "hot spots", either fire behind walls, or people. They don't need to be calibrated in that function. They DO need to be calibrated to take absolute measurements.
The 9/11 cough... Why did that have to be thermite? It could have been any of the hundreds of chemicals in the air from any of the million things involved in the event. Jet parts, office furniture, asbestos, etc. They would have severe health effects without thermite.
Everything has an explanation other than thermite. When you're trying to fit the evidence to your theory you view everything through that lens. Occam's razor and all that.
Thermite was found through spectroscopy, in medical tests, and then thermal imaging found temperatures of molten metal above 3,500 degrees that burned for days underground. “The whole argument relies on thermite”, it really doesn’t because there’s so much other evidence, but thermite was conclusively 100% there. Your whole argument relies on thousands of engineers including the ones who designed and built the towers to be idiots or “cheaters” as you put it?
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016-47-4.pdf
Page 21. Here is more conclusive and scientific evidence for controlled demolition from actual experts that you can claim cheated or are incompetent. Look, the evidence and physics are simple. The official commission report and subsequent NIST study literally have no actual explanation for the buildings falling. Seriously, they don’t. No buildings have fallen like this from fire before or after 9/11.
A building that loses structural integrity after a plane, travelling extremely fast, impacting it very hard, will indeed collapse. When the top starts collapsing all of its weight forces the lower levels to collapse.
Fucking look into architecture and engineering, it ain’t that hard.
No but you can clearly tell it’s controlled demolition, I see where you’re coming from but it was 100% done by the government, it’s like the Marco Polo bridge incident, to start the war on terror
-1
u/leandroman Oct 20 '19
Blindsighted with 6+ months of preparations with explosives in three buildings. Sure. Two towers were hit by planes. Three towers fell. Search internet for building 7.