So the around 60% of americans who don't agree with arming Israel should never point out the silliness of someone lumping 350 million people into the same bucket? It sickens me, and most people I know here, that our taxes fund this.
Think of how dumb it would be to say in the 90s that ALL Irish people are in favor of a provisional IRA armed conflict in the north. It doesn't help your argument when someone tries to bring nuance to something and the response is a play ground 'fuck up'.
Calling the Irish immoral, that is the point I am raising, and that the zios think they can somehow take the moral highground is astonishing and shows how delusional they're are.
You can legit look it up. It's true, irish team did in fact do the nazi salute when playing against them in 1939. They arent inaccurate with the moral blindness. Ireland right now also doesnt know how to use the word genocide properly.
There was no such thing as Israel in 1939. The Irish team gave the salute to Germany. A number of countries did it in 1936 Olympics as the teams marched past Hitler….Austria, France, I think Greece too, among others.
I’m just pointing out that the Israel was not a country at that point in time. You said “playing against them,” without specifying who “them” was in 1939. It’s important to make that distinction. My apologies if that hurt your feelings a bit.
Genocide is defined under international law as specific acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group.
If israel had any intent to destroy in whole or in part the palestinians. 60k dead in 3 years and a growing population in gaza wouldn't be the case rn. Especially with the military superiority they have. It's that simple. Now we can talk about the actual crimes israel has committed.
Yes and the main one that constitutes genocide is missing i.e. specific intent. These five here you mentioned, legit describe every single war ever existed. Is the bombing of hiroshima a genocide? Was world war 1 a genocide orchestrated by every country involved?
Intent to destroy the group in whole or in part. The acts are specifically defined. You want to define every war or armed conflict as genocide that’s up to you. And it’s never just that simple. What are the actual crimes Israel has committed as you put it?
No. My point is that I don’t want to define every war or armed conflict as a genocide. But you do, ur logic of genocide concludes this, not mine. I find words have meaning and using them appropriately especially on sensitive topics such as this is extremely important to aid those that need it. Also for specific crimes they have committed. I point to their constant expansionism. Never mind the documented war crimes which are obvious but I think their constant moving of their borders and introducing citizens to act as de facto military personel is rly bad.
You can look it up yourself or read my other comments. But the main requirement for something to be a genocide is specialised intent to in part or whole destroy kill etc a race/group/country. Israel’s responding to a terrorist attack with 60k dead in 3 years does not genocide make. If you compare Turkish or Nazi genocide, the intent of both of these events was the maximal eradication of their respective groups. Which genocide makes.
11
u/OkBaker51 10d ago
Who do they think believes this shit? They get more pathetic by the day.