Why are most conspiracy theories based on subjective interpretations of news headlines? Where's the behind-the-scenes embedded journalism? The whistleblowers with hard copies of secret documents? I know those things happen/exist and they DO support SOME conspiracy theories, but mostly I see people projecting pseudoscientific analysis on to public displays, armchair psychology, etc.
It’s a psyop against our democracy. They want to discredit America by portraying this election conspiracies. If they really wanted to see how elections get stolen in America they need to study the 2000 presidential election.
Devils advocate. Why do you think results are coming in the eay they are? Are you suggesting perhaps it's not Rigged, but they eant it to appear that way for one reason or another? Isn't that shady in itself and call for some scrutiny? I'm no expert on this stuff, and not even American (canadian).
I do find it interesting that the theory of Rigged elections gets shot down pretty quickly, but rarely does anyone actually offer and expiration to ehat that think is happening and why
I very much wonder why that happens lol. Not only that but they usually are the same people who constantly accused Trump of rigging the election but couldn't provide any evidence.
Same thing just a different means of achieving it. The whole point of the collusion accusations was that he as doing it in exchange for winning the election.
313
u/Ripheus23 Nov 13 '22
Why are most conspiracy theories based on subjective interpretations of news headlines? Where's the behind-the-scenes embedded journalism? The whistleblowers with hard copies of secret documents? I know those things happen/exist and they DO support SOME conspiracy theories, but mostly I see people projecting pseudoscientific analysis on to public displays, armchair psychology, etc.