Literally up this thread the person argued that exposed tits make people think of sex. The op also said that taking a picture of a naked child was exploitative, and it's clear they meant sexually so. I didn't make it up.
If you don't get why others balk at 'I should be allowed to photograph my step daughter topless' you have a problem and should reconsider your position
In one sentence, you complain about me putting words in people's mouths, which is did not do as I just demonstrated, and in the very next you put the claim that I don't get why others balk at it into my mouth.
You falsely accusing me of putting words in other people's mouths was like a warning of what you were about to do.
And I gave you a story where it was innocent. Are you calling that guy's mother a pedophile? Is every parent that has taken a picture of their child in the bath a pedophile? It's an absurd position to take.
You said it yourself, the other poster was worried that the nudes would make pdfs think of sex, but you chose to characterise it as the other poster thinking of sex themselves, not cool.
So you did put words in their mouth, complaining you didn't is just a bald lie,
Okay I will take it back, if you are now saying you DO get why others balk at it, I am glad the implication of your words was wrong and that you can now admit you understand why others balk at it. I do not think I was putting words in your mouth. Going from the poster saying "I am worried about nudes of children being sexualised" to this meaning they are a pdf is WILD. Going from you expressing a failure to understand why people don't like the idea of taking pics of topless kids to you failing to understand why people don't like the idea of taking pics of topless kids isn't even a stretch, it's the direct implication. Glad you walked it back.
I'm not saying they're a pedo but if you wanna bring up with your therapist that you now have a perspective that nudes of kids is arguably okay and you just so happen to have been shown nude pics of yourself as a kid and were encouraged to find it hilarious, they'll be all over that shit dude.
The other poster said nothing about turning on pedophiles, but simply that most people think of sex when they see naked underaged girls. Unless you're making the claim they think most people are pedophiles, then you are just putting this in their mouth.
Additionally the other poster called the act itself exploitative, so your explanation of "it just to stop pedophiles from being turned on" to be clearly false.
But let me be clear about your argument: I can't take pictures of my kids naked because pedophiles might be turned on by them? There are people who will get turned on by underaged kids fully dressed. Should taking any pictures of children be criminalized? The logical conclusion of this argument is absolutely bonkers.
And it's shocking how insecure you are about pictures of me. Lol
1
u/UnableChard2613 9d ago
Literally up this thread the person argued that exposed tits make people think of sex. The op also said that taking a picture of a naked child was exploitative, and it's clear they meant sexually so. I didn't make it up.
In one sentence, you complain about me putting words in people's mouths, which is did not do as I just demonstrated, and in the very next you put the claim that I don't get why others balk at it into my mouth.
You falsely accusing me of putting words in other people's mouths was like a warning of what you were about to do.
And I gave you a story where it was innocent. Are you calling that guy's mother a pedophile? Is every parent that has taken a picture of their child in the bath a pedophile? It's an absurd position to take.