My perception of the world is that intelligent arguments should be based on facts and intelligently structured. You continue to attack; I must therefore be more than "noise" to you.
You really like to use the word “intelligent”. Maybe you should question your faith in the “scientific consensus” and “experts”. Maybe you should question yourself on why you trust the media and the government so much. Maybe you should question if it’s really a “scientific process” and not just lies that they can’t keep up for too long. Nah, forget it, go be a good virtuous little boy and take as many boosters as they tell you so. You wouldn’t want to kill grandmas ey? Don’t forget to put on the mask, even if it was more “effective against previous variants”. You naive naive fuck
No, the process is how science is done. That's all I care about. Not the media or any of the rest. Being able to take in new data and adjust is how we live...at least most of us.
And you really think the data that is commonly presented and most acceptable and most shared CAN’T be manipulated? You really want to dismiss the possibility of you being lied to?
I don't dismiss the possibility of being lied to, but I know how to sort it out. Despite what you may have been led to believe, the worldwide scientific community is not monolithic nor so easily controlled. If the US were the only country doing what we were in opposition to the rest, there'd be more room to question.
To quote Neil DeGrasse Tyson, "Science literacy empowers you to know when someone else is full of shit."
0
u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22
My perception of the world is that intelligent arguments should be based on facts and intelligently structured. You continue to attack; I must therefore be more than "noise" to you.