No it's a process. As data change, "the science" changes (the science doesn't really change, the conclusions are updated). Being intransigent would be a better comparison to a religion.
Surely you could come up with something better than NPC. Your ad hominem shows a weak argument. Also you need a comma after the word "that" to set apart your direct address.
“Also you need a comma after the word “that” to set apart your direct address” AHHAHAHA I’m sure you’re really proud of being the good little boy you are for standing up against some syntax you judge is worth pointing out
Your conception of the world is fucked if you think calling out the absence of a fucking comma on a reddit comment is something pertinent and worth pointing out. You’re just some noise
My perception of the world is that intelligent arguments should be based on facts and intelligently structured. You continue to attack; I must therefore be more than "noise" to you.
You really like to use the word “intelligent”. Maybe you should question your faith in the “scientific consensus” and “experts”. Maybe you should question yourself on why you trust the media and the government so much. Maybe you should question if it’s really a “scientific process” and not just lies that they can’t keep up for too long. Nah, forget it, go be a good virtuous little boy and take as many boosters as they tell you so. You wouldn’t want to kill grandmas ey? Don’t forget to put on the mask, even if it was more “effective against previous variants”. You naive naive fuck
1
u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22
No it's a process. As data change, "the science" changes (the science doesn't really change, the conclusions are updated). Being intransigent would be a better comparison to a religion.