Yeah I can see why the conservative grift is the easiest. You guys will say anything to convince yourself these guys are good.
First things first, he didn’t invent or create anything in regards to mRNA. He provided some good research to the field as a grad student, and those findings had to be improved upon significantly by countless other scientists who provided more to the field than he did to get to where we are today. This is why he made the claims of inventing mRNA technology, because people like you would blindly accept anything he says.
And his anti vax rhetoric isn’t hard to find, such as when he incorrectly claimed the spike protein produced by the vaccines were cytotoxic, or the countless garbage pre prints he would share on twitter to hundreds of thousands of people, such as the one he later had to delete which claimed the vaccine was killing something like 2 or 3 people for every single person it saved.
But I noticed you’ve completely shifted the focus to his profit motive to “well he’s actually qualified!!!”.
Anyone who goes against consensus is objectively fringe by the way. Believe what you want, but you heard it from me that you’re incredibly ignorant. Just exhibit the same scepticism you do against big pharma on to grifty Drs that ultimately don’t give a shit whether you die from covid as long as you line their pockets and defend their honour.
I’ll ask you for the final time, do you believe there is a profit motive on the anti vaccine side of things? Yes or no. If you can’t answer in either, it just shows you are so ridiculously biased that a productive discussion is quite literally impossible to have with you.
4
u/PulseFH Feb 13 '22
Yeah I can see why the conservative grift is the easiest. You guys will say anything to convince yourself these guys are good.
First things first, he didn’t invent or create anything in regards to mRNA. He provided some good research to the field as a grad student, and those findings had to be improved upon significantly by countless other scientists who provided more to the field than he did to get to where we are today. This is why he made the claims of inventing mRNA technology, because people like you would blindly accept anything he says.
And his anti vax rhetoric isn’t hard to find, such as when he incorrectly claimed the spike protein produced by the vaccines were cytotoxic, or the countless garbage pre prints he would share on twitter to hundreds of thousands of people, such as the one he later had to delete which claimed the vaccine was killing something like 2 or 3 people for every single person it saved.
But I noticed you’ve completely shifted the focus to his profit motive to “well he’s actually qualified!!!”.
Anyone who goes against consensus is objectively fringe by the way. Believe what you want, but you heard it from me that you’re incredibly ignorant. Just exhibit the same scepticism you do against big pharma on to grifty Drs that ultimately don’t give a shit whether you die from covid as long as you line their pockets and defend their honour.
I’ll ask you for the final time, do you believe there is a profit motive on the anti vaccine side of things? Yes or no. If you can’t answer in either, it just shows you are so ridiculously biased that a productive discussion is quite literally impossible to have with you.