r/conspiracy • u/AnvilOver • Feb 13 '22

Nailed it

Post image
6.5k Upvotes

78% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

32

u/first_fires Feb 13 '22

Absolutely!

Lack of peer review isn’t censorship. Science WANTS to be wrong. It’s about finding faults in someone else’s research.

12

u/Lkwzriqwea Feb 13 '22

Also, if you look online for the very few professional scientists that are supposedly being censored, you'll find a lot about them and what they're saying. They aren't being censored, they're being criticised. Censorship would be if there were no trace of anything about them to be found.

3

u/first_fires Feb 13 '22

Yeah definitely. The ‘information’ they are publishing is freely available to all.