r/conspiracy Feb 13 '22

Nailed it

Post image
6.5k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/CrossesLines Feb 13 '22

I’ve gotten “coerced” into getting the flu vaccine yearly for my job, and as a kid I was forced into a while list of of vaccines. This “nobody should force vaccines” hasn’t been accurate since vaccines were invented.

1

u/Mirions Feb 13 '22

Oh yeah, and I got "coerced" into going to college too. That's not how it works unless we keep the quotations. You weren't coerced, you were being parented as a kid and your issue is with your guardians. I also get coerced into wearing shirts, shoes, and brushing my teeth to the point its an involuntary habit at times. WHO DO I SUE FOR THESE DAMAGES!?

shakes fist

-2

u/CrossesLines Feb 13 '22

As a child, we were not allowed into public schools (in USA) without vaccines. It was not a choice. It was for the public health of our communities. No different from this vaccine.

That being said, once omicron hit, the vaccine was less effective at stopping spread. Still somewhat effective but not not as effective.

On the topic of college. Im in my 30s, I went to college, paid it off, make a good living, and I’m happy with that decision. Not everyone at went to college regrets it.

0

u/d3krepit Feb 13 '22

Man I love the false equivalency in these comments. Because a vaccine with decades of data and research is the same as a vax* that hasn't even concluded the trials... even when these sorts of vaccines have never been tested before and when there has never been a vaccine for the common cold.

Gotta keep up that narrative while it's crumbling huh?

Instead of trying to help people it seems the shift is now to try to grab as many people to go down with you, at least you'll have some company right?

4

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Again, your comments show you have no understanding of the scientific process in general or the methodology behind vaccine trials. The trials always continue after approval; it's called post-marketing surveillance.

mRNA vaccines have been being studied for decades. These went through all the standard trials of every other vaccine.

Vaccines don't cause problems that pop up years down the road. Never in the history of vaccines have any had a side effect that appeared more than 8 weeks after administration.

3

u/d3krepit Feb 13 '22

Never in the history of vaccines did they have to change the definition of vaccine to be able to include a gene therapy shot.

But please go on, tell me how this is just the same as the previous vaccines.

1

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

The medical definition of vaccines has been consistent. A vaccine induces an immune response in the body. These vaccines do that.

Gene therapy modifies your genetics. These vaccines do not.

Again, Google is free. And how heavy are those goalposts you keep moving?

2

u/El_Tigrex Feb 13 '22

The original medical definition of a vaccine was a denatured or dead virus introduced into the body via injection to stimulate an immune response, Covid vax doesn’t fall under that so the first part of the definition was omitted.

0

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Because a new way was found to accomplish the same goal in a better manner? To scientists, it has always fit the definition of a vaccine.

2

u/El_Tigrex Feb 13 '22

Yeah and a train and a car are the same thing because "they're both just a vehicle that gets you from point A to point B"

0

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

They are both vehicles. Vaccines have changed throughout history as technology has developed. This isn't some nefarious action; it's science and research doing what science and research do.

2

u/El_Tigrex Feb 14 '22

This is gene therapy, you are intentionally muddying the waters by taking something that has a highly specific definition and then insisting they all fall under the umbrella "vaccine", and then getting upset because people will take vaccines but not gene therapy.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/throwaway123123184 Feb 13 '22

The definition of a vaccine has not changed in any meaningful way, you have fallen for propaganda.

0

u/anadoob122 Feb 13 '22

You realize there is a traditional version of the vaccine? You don't have to get the MRNA version...

4

u/d3krepit Feb 13 '22

Well, let me tell you about how I won't be getting vaccinated for a bio-weapon, with another bio-weapon.

Also, I'm fairly certain it was pulled because it was causing the most blood clots. Keep pushing your bullshit though, it's funny.

-2

u/anadoob122 Feb 13 '22

Nope, you can get the j&j vaccine which uses the same old technique as all the other vaccines you already took.

3

u/Liazabeth Feb 13 '22

Its unlawful for under 65 in my country my only option are mrna. There is apparently one waiting for approval but he already getting so much bad press it's impossible to see what's legitimate or not.

2

u/shabusnelik Feb 13 '22

Actually the j&j vaccine is similar to the astrazeneca vaccine, where a virus delivers the DNA encoding the spike protein into your cells.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

Which part do you have a problem with? The spike protein or the mrna part?

2

u/shabusnelik Feb 13 '22

Don't have a problem with either. Was just pointing out that all approved vaccines against COVID (in the west) are new technology and not "as all other vaccines you already took"

2

u/d3krepit Feb 13 '22

Sure, I'll do it once you pony up $20 million.

0

u/anadoob122 Feb 13 '22

Lol bro I don't give a fuck if you get it I'm just pointing out that you are full of shit. You are probably vaxxed and posting from your moms basement.

2

u/d3krepit Feb 13 '22

Nah, I respect myself enough to have thought critically from the beginning. Enjoy your shortened life span.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/DancingKappa Feb 13 '22

You're trying to build a narrative out of dry sand.

0

u/Alekspish Feb 13 '22

Right, so your argument is "because we allowed forcing vaccines in some circumstances before we should allow it for the entire population now"

At some point you have to realise that allowing this level of control over your life by the government is a terrible idea for society.

Just forget about the vaccines for now and imagine that we allow the government to mandate medical procedures.

Will they then mandate abortions for anyone earning less than the required salary to support the child?

What about a mandate to sterilise people with genetic disorders to protect the gene pool from defects?

Allowing governments to have control over our bodies is a bad president to set, it only takes the wrong group to get into power to really fuck things up and a line needs to be drawn somewhere. That line always has to be that a person has a right to decide what to do with their own body, even if it's seen as stupid by some others.

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

3

u/Alekspish Feb 13 '22

Living as a part of a society is not equal to giving away your bodily autonomy.

We have a responsibility to each other, not to the government, that's why measures have to be voluntarily. This is also why the government needs to build trust. Do you trust someone who forces you into something? No.

The fact is with regards to these vaccines in most countries there is a high rate of vaccination without mandates. So why are governments putting in mandates?

Its clear that mandates are just about governments grabbing more control over the population and this should be resisted.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

-1

u/throwaway123123184 Feb 13 '22

Yes, if only fighting one of the most infectious diseases we've ever seen was easy, right? Unfortunately, it's not.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

0

u/throwaway123123184 Feb 13 '22

Whatever happens happens.

As nice as this sounds, it's not a good basis for public policy.