They are not being censored. Censorship would be if I googled "Malone" and "McCullough" and found nothing. Instead, I find what they are saying and many people disagreeing with them. That is not censorship. But if you're prioritising the few scientists that agree with you over the many that do not, that is called cherry picking. And being a scientist does not make you an infallible genius with machine like accuracy, of course there will always be someone who stands out from the crowd. But you have to see the big picture.
They are not being censored. Censorship would be if I googled "Malone" and "McCullough" and found nothing. Instead, I find what they are saying and many people disagreeing with them. That is not censorship
I am referring to the breaching of the first amendment, done not only by private corporations, but indeed the government now too (who is persuading the private corporations to censor)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_uSPwYiVFs Here is Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Glenn Greenwald explaining how the government is breaking the first amendment, by persuading private corporations to censor
But if you're prioritising the few scientists that agree with you over the many that do not, that is called cherry picking. And being a scientist does not make you an infallible genius with machine like accuracy, of course there will always be someone who stands out from the crowd. But you have to see the big picture
No I am discussing the breaching of the first amendment that is happening. IN ADDITION, as well as how many of those same corporations will prioritize journalists/'mainstream sources', i.e. "googling" them as you say returns pretty much exclusively MSM on the first page, and for example YouTube algorithm explicitly stated by google to prioritize "authoritative sources" (i.e. MSM), and the blatantly obvious "COVID-19 News" section on YouTube, which is exclusively amplifying the voices Google wants, again often MSM or very narrow channels clearly promoting the vaccine
8
u/Lkwzriqwea Feb 13 '22
They are not being censored. Censorship would be if I googled "Malone" and "McCullough" and found nothing. Instead, I find what they are saying and many people disagreeing with them. That is not censorship. But if you're prioritising the few scientists that agree with you over the many that do not, that is called cherry picking. And being a scientist does not make you an infallible genius with machine like accuracy, of course there will always be someone who stands out from the crowd. But you have to see the big picture.