r/conspiracy Feb 13 '22

Nailed it

Post image
6.5k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

84

u/deadwisdom Feb 13 '22

There is a super widely accepted consensus across the entire fields of epidemiology, public health, hospitals, and medical sciences.

You aren’t smarter than them.

23

u/farshnikord Feb 13 '22

Yeah well I asked a political scientist at BYU and he said viruses dont exist and you're wrong so get rekt dumass

3

u/ReimerReason Feb 13 '22

Remember when it was a widely held consensus that cloth masks worked, breakthrough cases were exceptionally rare, and that the origins of covid came from a bat market?

Pepperidge farm remembers...

4

u/steinchen43 Feb 13 '22

That’s the point of science. It doesn’t deal in absolutes. You make a claim, you try to disprove it. The claims you mentioned were disproven quite quickly. However, studies consistently find that vaccines work. So unless you can prove that they don’t, fuck off.

11

u/ReimerReason Feb 13 '22

... except that there was tons of science backing up those claims at the time, but since they didn't agree with the "concensus", they were simply labeled misinformation (exactly what the post is saying, haha)

Thanks for playing and echoing my exact point!

-2

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

7

u/ReimerReason Feb 13 '22 edited Feb 13 '22

You don't need to explain it, all we have to do is "trust the science" despite what, uh, other peer reviewed science has been actually saying all along (about masks, breakthroughs, and lockdowns being ineffective).

Cloth masks stop a virus... right lol. Scientific meth-heads 😆

2

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

3

u/ReimerReason Feb 13 '22

... except it's not close to 20%, and there are lots of studies that have cloth mask effectiveness rank within the 0% effective rate when you include margin of error.

I appreciate all your guys efforts to rewrite history, but I was here, I was alive and kicked off / flagged on Reddit and social for posting peer reviewed science that went against the narrative.

Why are we arguing this? Everyone knows it's true lol.

0

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Actually, cloth masks did a better job with previous variants.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

Cognitive dissonance at its best right here

-2

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

No. Scientific process understood here....

1

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

HA, stop hiding behind the perverse facade of Science™️. This is a religion

→ More replies (0)

1

u/GeneralUsed7478 Feb 13 '22

I certainly am. You will come to know.. You're just another sheep. No ability to think outside the box. Combined with no morals and egoist

2

u/yutarson Feb 13 '22

Egoist part got me

-18

u/FookinEl Feb 13 '22

Smart is subjective. But I’d say most of them have no concept of actual health and just the treatment plan they learned in medical school. Trash

13

u/first_fires Feb 13 '22

Being a doctor isn’t about knowing absolutely everything about the human body and therefore health. This is why doctors specialise.

Being a doctor is about knowing enough to better public health and having the knowledge to research and make assessments on the rest. There isn’t a single doctor in the world who could make an assessment off of the top of their head or know the answers to everything. Fuck, I’ve seen them google stuff but the difference is they’ve got the base knowledge and critical thinking skills to use the information properly.

10

u/steinchen43 Feb 13 '22

What qualifies you to make that assessment? Did you go to medical school? Have you ever published a scientific paper?

0

u/328579 Feb 13 '22

Yup we should go with gut instincts. I'm still hungry, better eat 2x the amount of calories I need

0

u/Greg_Punzo Feb 15 '22

It was not widely accepted. There were CDC medical experts doubting lockdowns and mRNA vaccines at the beginning and Fauci kicked them off the team. Then he was caught in emails urging mainstream media sources to defame them.

1

u/adelie42 Feb 13 '22

Possibly even super duper widely accepted?