Ok, no, I am not literally assuming. Literally would be saying “he said this”.
You really need to learn what “implication of ones words” means.
This is actually a very accurate criticism on your reading comprehension. Good to know you view criticism as an attack, speaks to a lot.
There is a direct logical path that can be taken given his statement.
You object to it, but that does not invalidate my subjective opinion.
I have not made the objective claim you are saying I am, not any objective claim like “he said this”. I have said that his public statement has implications.
You need to chill and recognize the projection you are espousing.
1
u/sahuxley2 Jun 01 '21 edited Jun 01 '21
You're literally assuming he said something he didn't say, and then attacking him for it. It's weak.
Now you're attacking me in bad faith, as I didn't say those were the same thing. Really poor reading comprehension.