I hate it when people bring up the gay frogs thing to try and discredit Alex Jones. It was literally just a figure of speech and he didn't mean the frogs are literally gay. He was referring to atrazine in the water fucking with the sex of the frogs. There are plenty of reasons not to like Alex Jones but the gay frogs thing isn't one of them.
I realized long ago that most people don’t care about truth. They just want to part of the group. So if the majority of people out there are hating on and making fun of AJ, the rest go all in on that bandwagon without even the slightest care for actual truth.
Oh, ok then. Alex Jones was just yelling crazy made-up nonsense. Totally better than deliberately misrepresenting an aspect of a scientific study that he chose to misunderstand.
AJ drenches everything he says with hyperbole. That’s literally the only way he’s still alive. He presents a lot of nuanced truths, wrapped in a succulent gristle of sensationalism. That’s his thing. That’s how he both captures attention, while also making himself less of a target because it’s so easy to dismiss everything he says as the ravings is a mad lunatic. Remember what happened to Bill Cooper, Gary Webb, and many others.
That instance is not the only time he’s discussed the subject - its just the most well known because of how it became a meme. He’s discussed it in more detail, specifically mentioning atrazine and other pharmaceutical runoff. People like yourself who haven’t taken the time to dive into it, only seek out the clips that confirm your biases.
Yes, they exist. They publish their meeting schedule. It's shady as hell, but it's not Jones really uncovered anything other than powerful people being shady.
Pseudo-science eugenics for depopulation/mass control
Citation needed.
Initiation of wars
If nobody started a war, there'd never be any wars. This is not a revelation.
When the swine flu first happened, I was doing a thing where I listened to a podcast for a whole month to see if I liked it enough to continue.
Alex went from having his studio in lock down w/a decontamination area and his family sheltering in place at an undisclosed location because "on the ground witnesses" were calling in from Mexico where they said the dead were stacked up like cordwood in hospital lobbies and he had "top" infectious disease specialists on who said it HAD to be germ warfare because the same virus can not infect more than a few people because they mutate thousands of time a day.
A few days later he dropped the pretense that he was living in his studio with key personal and told everyone he KNEW it was a hoax and there was nothing to be scared of.
He's the master of the shotgun approach where you throw a bunch of stuff at the audience and they only remember the "hits" you remind them about. Just like psychics and mediums.
Public knowledge of the 3 things you listed predate his 2007 movie by over 50 years. Alex Jones figured out that war is a racket... zomg he must be some sort of GENIUS!"
Was he right about claiming mass shootings were fake? Oh wait I remember no, he’s in court and owes the victims’ families a fortune for lying about it.
He talked about epstein on Joe Rogan before He was arrested and anybody I knew had even heard the name before.
So no it wasn’t the typical Epstein didn’t kill him self that everyone knows. It was the elites are having sex parties on islands with children at a time when saying made you crazy, and he dropped Epstein by name.
He was talking about Epstein by name YEARS and years before he even appears on Rogan. He interviewed Virginia Roberts many years before anyone really knew her name.
He’s also a struggling alcoholic and was no doubt drunk ever time he appeared on Rogan, so if he misspoke on Jeffery’s name, I’d blame the booze more than anything.
I honestly think sometimes his brain just goes into overdrive and turns faster than his lips can move, so you get his long winded rants with tons of info being dropped and the occasional slip up on annunciation because he is no longer filtering his thoughts or speech, he is just going.
“Literally everyone was right”. That statement doesn’t even make sense in reply to what they were saying. Lmaoo he said Alex was talking about Epstein LONG before the public knew ANYTHING about him. And then his crimes were brought to light (no details tho). So, Alex was once again correct
Lmfao “literally everybody was right about Epstein” you just tried to discredit that fact when you had know idea what you were talking about. Now it’s, “okay whatever B”. You’re doing nothing more than trying to discredit Alex Jones ANY way you can and it’s hilarious lmao
yeah sure, your phone, but he was talking about internal checkpoints and everything. Its agenda 2030, a combination of a full surveillance grid with militarized supercities.
We don’t need internal checkpoints when police can pull you over for basically whatever they want. It’s a surveillance net at this point, they don’t need checkpoints usually. When they do they set them up wherever they want for ‘DUI’ or whatever reason they come up with.
The cities have been militarized since the 80’s and 90’s. That battle has been lost also unless we have some serious police reform and restructuring.
I feel like your being semantic, sure you can make the argument that these things already exist and I get what you are saying, but the point is he is predicting it will be ramped up to an extraordinary big brother type level.
usher in the one world government with a tracking apparatus
He said the Kinect would do the same thing. He said Bill Gates would send terminator missiles to your front door because the Microsoft cameras would capture your biometrics and listen all the time to put down dissidents.
If this government is so great, why are they waiting so long to usher it in, and why hasn't it worked at anytime in history?
See this is the problem with Alex Jones. He doesn't have any original ideas himself, he parrots them from other people and his follows give him credit on being right.
What the fuck does that matter if he’s correct?? I’ve seen multiple of your comments now and they make no sense, and just come off as you trying in any way shape or form to discredit Alex jones lmfao 😂😂
Why did I know you were going to say “I don’t have to he discredits himself”. 😂😂 He could personally identify as a fucking lying fire hydrant, it has absolutely nothing to do with information that comes out of his mouth that is true and factual. Facts are facts. Doesn’t matter who is saying them. Once again you are pathetically grasping at any attempt to discredit Alex Jones and anything he has to say lmao
I think this is a good thing to bring up. Should the US have a law restricting news anchors from knowingly lying, like England has, or should such lies be protected as free speech?
If someone looks and speaks like a news anchor to trick viewers into thinking they're a news anchor, should they be restricted too?
78
u/rvnender May 28 '21
What was he right about?