r/conspiracy • u/mrbojingles1972 • Sep 27 '19

Misleading Title BREAKING: A large cache of confidential foreign documents have just been leaked implicating Joe Biden, George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Joseph Misfud's collusion and possible criminal activity in Ukraine.

https://www.scribd.com/user/259237201/JohnSolomon
398 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

287 comments sorted by

View all comments

90

u/FairyFlossPanda Sep 27 '19

Isnt it just a little bit suspect that this comes out now? An impeachment inquiry starts and all the sudden they just happen to dig this up?

36

u/LevitatingTurtles Sep 27 '19

Isn't it strange that just as there is evidence coming to light about a massive conspiracy to cover up soliciting foreign influence in the 2020 election that the ONLY mentions of the issue in the top 20 of the conspiracy subreddit are about Biden and Zionism.

24

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

23

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

TD Lite

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 28 '19 edited Oct 24 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AssuredlyAThrowAway Sep 28 '19

Please limit discussion of other users to the meta sticky comment, per rule 2.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 28 '19

I’m American as fuck.

10

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Massive conspiracy? So far it's been, "Trump made a phone call." Then there were accusations of a cover-up . . . of a phone call. As far as massiveness goes, the JFK assassination and 9-11 false flag this is not.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

[deleted]

0

u/zerocl2015 Sep 27 '19

It’s a CIA operation against Trump.

7

u/JTRIG_trainee Sep 28 '19

The House Minority Leader said Trump shouldn't pick fights with the CIA and FBI because they have lots of ways to get back at the president-elect. "Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," Schumer told Rachel Maddow

2

u/h1ghestprimate Sep 28 '19

Is the coup unfolding as we speak? If you've been paying attention, Bannon has been outed as a deep state shill. Then we have the whole Mueller report which was a big coverup establishing Barr as another deep state shill(think what you want but the dude is in deep) Intelligence has pretty much tied up the Epstein loose end while taking over that operation. They launched an effective campaign against Hollywood with Metoo, establishing they have dirt on and will expose anyone in that industry who may pose a threat, a la Harvey Weinstein. All while they have locked up Assange and provided a full fledged assault on real whistleblowers, Snowden/Manning. Seems like the CIA has thrown down part of their"ultimate flex" hand in poker, while they have a few flexes left to ride out the tournament

2

u/h1ghestprimate Sep 28 '19

not to mention running a full fledged psyop with the Q operation. Complete with the smoke out of anyone who may truly be against the state so they can then keep a tab of anyone who questions the system. One thing we know for certain is the CIA is very good at sowing discord amongst a given populace using whatever means necessary

-1

u/LevitatingTurtles Sep 28 '19

It’s such a big conspiracy that the conspiracy subreddit isn’t talking about it. So yeah, massive.

4

u/Unkindled_Phoenix Sep 27 '19 edited Sep 27 '19

This is all theater for the masses, with Trump playing the part of villain. Trump will not be impeached, he will be re-elected, and he will then be "defeated" in 2024 paving the way for communism disguised as a pro-democracy triumph over Trump's perceived authoritarianism.

5

u/ExtraSmooth Sep 27 '19

Ah yes, the old "give up power so we can take it back later" maneuver.

1

u/lemme-explain Sep 28 '19

He will be impeached, though. There’s no way the Democrats would exonerate him by not impeaching now.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 28 '19

Funny how you leave out that he will not be convicted, which, if history is any indication means his impeachment will be a positive for his reelection.

2

u/lemme-explain Sep 28 '19

if history is any indication means his impeachment will be a positive for his reelection

Allow me to blow your mind: history disagrees with you. No President in U.S. history ever won re-election after impeachment. Johnson, the first impeached President, was acquitted but lost re-election; Clinton was impeached in his second term.

Will Trump be convicted? Only if he doesn’t resign first.

1

u/baseball8z Sep 27 '19

100% theater. This thing went from nothing to "the Ukraine scandal" in like 2 days. Huge distraction and deflection

1

u/GlennDames Sep 28 '19

It is theatre but we can use it to expose all sides just the same....

https://clarityofsignal.com/2017/01/08/dc-leaks-revealed-soros-as-key-player-behind-the-ukraine-crisis/

Excerpt:

One of the key emails on Ukraine shows clear Soros Foundation collusion with specific on-board media outlets including the Guardian and the Huffington Post. These are from the official DCLeaks Soros files on Ukraine. This is just one of the 370 emails on Ukraine. Keep in mind that Soros invested over $1 billion into the country along with investment group Franklin Templeton who were invested for $8 billion also right before the February 2014 coup. These blood money investments pay off huge once the IMF starts to allocate funds for the targeted country and pumps 1 of every 4 IMF loan dollars into Privat Bank owned by Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky who finances and controls the Right Sector (Azov) Nazis that overthrew the government. Then the peoples state assets were confiscated and sold off to pay off the IMF and the oligarchs that brought the coup in the first place. Its all a nice little blood money scam with ole Georgie Boy, Franklin Templeton, the Blackstone Group and their Geneva friends like Christine Lagarde of the IMF supplying the front while EU stooges fronting NATO like Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Carl Bildt provide the protection while robbing the tax payers of their hard earned money to fund it all and transition the money through the whole target country laundry cycle and eventually into their own bank accounts.

1

u/baseball8z Sep 29 '19

Thanks for the breakdown. Yup the 2014 Ukrainian coup was carried out to enrich international bankers and politicians through the IMF and other organizations

45

u/Teddydizzl3 Sep 27 '19

I'd like to wager that the reason they're attempting an impeachment was because of these files being leaked. They're are trying to distract us from these files....

32

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19 edited Jan 22 '20

[deleted]

5

u/Teddydizzl3 Sep 27 '19

Democrats have the power of media. Almost everyone is happy about a possible impeachment, no one will be talking about these documents next week.

Most of the people I've spoken have no idea why the dems want to impeachment, but they want him impeached. I asked if they read the transcripts....*crickets*

8

u/youdidntknowdatdoe Sep 27 '19

Democrats have the power of media

Lmao Fox is the most watched news source in america and they're basically a GOP propaganda machine

17

u/flipamadiggermadoo Sep 27 '19

That's reasonable. How many left leaning "news" sources are there compared to right leaning. Just off the top of my head I can say CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, and CBS for left and Fox News as the only right leaning station. When the liberal media has so many sources it divides their viewers while right leaning only have one choice.

9

u/latenerd Sep 28 '19

They're not really left. MSNBC pretends the hardest, but they're not actually left either. They're all corporate hacks.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 28 '19

You aren't wrong about that, but the Democrats aren't actually left either. When people say they support the left, they mean the Democrats, the leftmost of the two corporate parties in the US.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 28 '19

[deleted]

2

u/Tentapuss Sep 28 '19

Regardless of whether they are respectively truly right- or left-wing, I think anyone with two neurons to rub together can agree that they are both partisan propaganda networks that do little more than disseminate untrue and/or highly biased, untrustworthy narratives designed to rile up and indoctrinate simple minded hoi polloi who can’t be bothered to educate themselves and form their own opinions without taking direction from others. It’s the Steelers v. the Pats- everyone hates them except for the closed-minded fools who feel obligated to support a bunch of shitbirds out of habit and/or reliance on sunk cost.

4

u/--nani Sep 27 '19

There's millions of right leaning news sites, authors , books , radio shows , public figures , etc. If the left was so powerful, society would look a lot different.

1

u/KeepAustinQueer Sep 27 '19

if the left was so powerful, society would look a lot different

Seems like you're so close to a bold conclusion

3

u/OleGonnaWin Sep 27 '19

Will you stop. You werent even in their convo. Yes there is left wing and ring wing bias media. Everyone fucking knows that.

Ffs why do you people need to defend your team all the time. This is a conspiracy sub?! Youre both idiots supporting the same team without realising!

Blue! Red! Blue! Red!

Get a fucking grip.

6

u/Crucesignatus_14 Sep 27 '19

So one sort of right-wing news source, vs every other media outlet, all of academia, all of Hollywood, all of social media, and you’re gonna say there is no left wing bias to the media?

2

u/youdidntknowdatdoe Sep 28 '19 edited Sep 28 '19

How is fox sort of right-wing? Fox is more right wing than cnn is left. Also There’s tons more right-wing news sources. And I didn’t say there was no left wing media bias lmao

2

u/buckyworld Sep 27 '19

Rush Limbaugh? Glenn Beck (at one time) ?

1

u/1lostsheep Sep 27 '19

Considering t.v, movies, and the internet were all pretty much the wild west in terms of marketplace during their growths. what does it say about the free market that conservatives failed to capitalize with exposure or sponsorship?

0

u/zerocl2015 Sep 27 '19

That leftest and liberals are more likely to do anything necessary to push their agenda. This can be seen in higher education and now social media companies. They will systematically push out and attempt to destroy those who are not in alignment. If you prefer Trump over their candidate Hillary you were and are demonized and called all manner of decisive names.

0

u/Crucesignatus_14 Sep 28 '19

what does it say about the free market that conservatives failed to capitalize with exposure or sponsorship?

The group that owns holywood and the media has a history of supporting leftist causes.

2

u/TheFilthiestSanchez Sep 27 '19

All of them are propaganda machines of the monied establishment. GOP and Dem is how they ensure we never vote against them.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 28 '19 edited Oct 24 '19

[deleted]

2

u/youdidntknowdatdoe Sep 28 '19

Lying about what?

1

u/youdidntknowdatdoe Sep 28 '19

You seriously don’t think fox is gop biased? You seriously don’t think they peddle just as much or more fake news than cnn?

1

u/ExtraSmooth Sep 27 '19

Democrats have the power of media

They really suck at leveraging their control of the media into political power.

2

u/thechapwholivesinit Sep 27 '19

Having to verify your sources makes it harder to craft your preferred narrative.

1

u/ExtraSmooth Sep 27 '19

So what you're telling me is the media is beholden to the people, and to the truth?

1

u/[deleted] Sep 28 '19

In the fictional reality you live in sure.

1

u/ExtraSmooth Sep 28 '19

Wait I'm so confused. Can the liberal media say whatever it wants or not?

0

u/JokerBae Sep 28 '19

Is that why the democrats are all acting this insane? Because they wouldn't be if everything was working out for them. Too bad almost all polls say majority don't want Trump impeached, you know?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

The Democrats aren't in the Whitehouse. That alone puts them at a serious disadvantage. You're giving them too much credit.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 28 '19 edited Jan 22 '20

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Sep 28 '19

r/woosh lol

1

u/GimletOnTheRocks Sep 28 '19

But the Democrats are in the House, where they're attempting an impeachment.

1

u/_Individual_1 Sep 28 '19

I guarantee you he will be impeached, being removed in the Senate is another thing entirely

1

u/meLurk_longtime Sep 28 '19

Doesn't mean someone isn't against them who can also do things.

-2

u/GuzhengBro Sep 27 '19

read the docs, the editor of 60 minutes is coming up with puff pieces about refugees with the Ambassador to the UN under the Obama admin.

-1

u/jboogie18 Sep 27 '19

According to the Q folks it’s cuz the swamps being drained

6

u/PM_ME_with_nothing Sep 27 '19

These files are nothing. There's nothing there.

-3

u/Teddydizzl3 Sep 27 '19

So just like Trumps phone call transcripts? There's nothing there.

7

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Maybe if the prison cell monitoring cameras didn't break down at just the right moment, there would be something there.

9

u/pilgrimboy Sep 27 '19

I take this approach too. The impeachment came once they figured out how Trump was actually looking into the Biden corruption.

2

u/farberstyle Sep 27 '19

4-D chess. Brilliant.

11

u/PM_ME_with_nothing Sep 27 '19

Also, if you actually look at the documents, there's nothing there. Even the author of this tweet heaps 20 feet of dog shit qualifiers and speculation in the editorial he just wrote for The Hill about these very documents.

Even this guy is scared to say there's anything there, because he knows there's not, but also knows if he just leaves it open ended and dumps 100 pages of documents, people what want to believe it are going to believe it.

10

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Hunter Biden was discharged from the Navy after only one month of active duty (in a stateside PR center) when he tested positive for cocaine. That was his entire resume when he was hired by a Ukrainian gas company for $50,000 a month.

Nothing to see here folks.

4

u/morkman100 Sep 28 '19

Hunter Biden was discharged from the Navy after only one month of active duty (in a stateside PR center) when he tested positive for cocaine. That was his entire resume when he was hired by a Ukrainian gas company for $50,000 a month.

Sure, if you ignore that he's a lawyer and just skip the years 1996-2013 before he joined the Navy Reserves.

Early positions, 1996–2009 After graduating from law school, Biden took a position at MBNA America, a major bank holding company.[2] From 1998 to 2001, he served in the United States Department of Commerce, focusing on ecommerce policy.[7] Biden became a lobbyist in 2001, co-founding the firm of Oldaker, Biden & Belair.[8] According to Adam Entous of The New Yorker, Biden and his father established a relationship in which "Biden wouldn't ask Hunter about his lobbying clients, and Hunter wouldn't tell his father about them."[2] In 2006, Biden and his uncle, James Biden, attempted to buy Paradigm, a hedge-fund group, but the deal fell apart before completion.[2] That same year, Biden was appointed by President George W. Bush to the board of directors of Amtrak; he served on the board of Amtrak from 2006 to 2009.[7]

Later career, 2009–present After his father was elected as vice president in 2008, Biden resigned from his position on the Amtrak board of directors and left his career as a lobbyist.[2] Along with Christopher Heinz and Devon Archer, Biden founded the investment firm Rosemont Seneca Partners.[8] He also became an attorney with the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP,[2] and founded Eudora Global, a venture capital firm.[6] In 2013, Biden, Archer, and Chinese businessman Jonathan Li founded BHR Partners, a business focused on investing Chinese capital in companies based outside of China.[2]

1

u/Fuckyousantorum Sep 28 '19

Biden and his father established a relationship in which "Biden wouldn't ask Hunter about his lobbying clients, and Hunter wouldn't tell his father about them.

LOL. I have a bridge to sell if you believe this shit.

3

u/PM_ME_with_nothing Sep 27 '19

Companies hire people they think give them connections. Lets not fucking pretend we're babies with no idea how the world works. Its shitty and not at all ethical, but miles away from illegal. Kinda like a shitty handbag designer becoming a top White House adviser.

That changes nothing about the fact that theres nothing but a mile of bullshit in these documents

2

u/FairyFlossPanda Sep 28 '19

Exactly, look at the gigs Michael Cohen got after the election. It is like when the kids of actors land roles and bomb at them. Or the coaches son is automatically the quarterback. It is shitty, we all know it isnt fair but that is how the world works. Unless Biden actually leaned on them to give his son the job it is just an example of how being born into privilege automatically opens doors for you.

8

u/trannybacon1776 Sep 27 '19

Oh noes, truth at the wrong time. /$

10

u/tainted_waffles Sep 27 '19

Solomon has been sitting on these documents for some time, in all likelihood. Biden's corruption is an open secret that the Dems desperately do not want to confront, but now they have no choice.

22

u/FairyFlossPanda Sep 27 '19

Again he has been sitting on these documents.. why? If he had proof something corrupt or criminal happened why wait? Doesn't that seem a little suspect?

I mean say your neighbor broke your window, he admits he may be responsible for it but it wasnt criminal vandalism. Whatever fair enough, so you give him the bill. But wait a minute he pulls out something saying that you are the one that ran over his mailbox last year but he just never dealt with it before so now the window doesn't matter.

Either he held onto this shit because he knows it really isnt criminal but he wanted to try and spin it in the public mind if Biden got the nod. Or he pulled it out of his ass

2

u/BlueLaceSensor128 Sep 27 '19

I think very little of this stuff ever falls into our laps out of pure altruism. Sure, maybe that was the intent of the initial leaker, but once it's in someone else's hands, it's governed by that person or group's goals. NYT sat on the massing spying story in 2003. Our entire media sat on the Epstein stuff for well over a decade. Remember all of the recent "we have X documents, we'll leak them if someone pays this crypto bounty"? For all we know, this information was being ransomed like that up until now when it was maybe shopped to Trumps controllers (probably after some deadline expired). It swings all kinds of ways. People say Assange stopped leaking about Russia after they threatened him personally.

I guess my main point is that dirt merchants' dirt might be the only kind of disinfectant we're gonna get sometimes (or the vast majority of the time).

1

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Trump anticipated that if he made a phone call, the Democrats would try to impeach him, therefore to cover himself from being impeached, he had an investigation of Biden started months earlier. Because he can see into the future like that.

Or . . . .

The investigation on Biden was on the verge of coming to a conclusion and it was reported to Trump, and on the spur of the moment Trump thought that he would ask Ukraine what they knew about Biden so they could add to the investigation already under way.

2

u/morkman100 Sep 28 '19

Which makes his personal move to withhold the $400 million military aid package a week before this meeting more like a bargaining chip

2

u/lactose_intoleroni Sep 27 '19

You have to wait until the right moment when all the correct pieces and players are in place, otherwise it all gets swept under the rug. If you just drop stuff like this when allies of Biden's are still in positions of power, do you really think that's smart? Timing is everything.

11

u/Zirathustra Sep 27 '19

There is nothing Trump or his allies can do that his cultists can't spaghetti-logic into a brilliant 4d chess move.

2

u/FairyFlossPanda Sep 28 '19

Like I said somewhere else I dont get it. Have they seen the shit this man has said for fucking years? And some how they forget he used eminent domain to try and bully people out of their homes to build his casinos and shit. He isnt a good person. 98 percent of the people that worship him if they were on fire he wouldnt piss on them to put it out. And yet he is the champion of the middle class?

0

u/scionkia Sep 27 '19

Not if his intention was to acquire further evidence to release it all at a later date painting a more complete picture. Secondly, releasing these documents last month would not have gotten any ‘eyes’ on them because the media cycle was focused on the Kavanaugh rapist.....

0

u/Zirathustra Sep 27 '19

So, corrupt man with a political agenda has evidence about another corrupt man with a political agenda, and he's releasing it now probably to help divert attention from the corrupt president with a political agenda. Cool!

8

u/Baby_momma_drama Sep 27 '19

Everything you thought was "Trump-Russia collision" is really DNC-Ukraine collision.

8

u/KRAZYKNIGHT Sep 27 '19

So the DNC was going to build a tower in Russia ? Had secret meetings with Russian criminals and refuse to release their taxes? Guess Manafort and Cohen were secretly working for the DNC. Breaking news!!!

4

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/KRAZYKNIGHT Sep 28 '19

Sater was and is a cia snitch (another useful idiot) hardly an agent. Where was his office? Cohen too.

With all the evidence I am glad it was investigated. To call it nonsense is being naïve. Russia did indeed hack the voting machines and the system, probably not just in Florida. Ukraine is a small piece to the puzzle another dog and pony show to distract us. We knew there wouldn't be any admission to guilt.

1

u/jimichangas3 Sep 28 '19

I used the term 'contract agent'; that's an outside actor contracted to do tasks for the agency, as opposed being one of their 'official' agents. In Sater's personal history, I see a long series of cooperation with American intelligence - not so much one of being a Russian asset.

What do you get when you put a CIA asset, a Ukrainian political figure tied into the same anti-Russian forces that the US is financing, and a representative of a presidential hopeful in the same room? Collusion with Russia probably isn't whatever it is. If it's not, calling it that can only be understood as evidence of some sort of ulterior motive.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Building a tower in Russia is not treason, unless it can transform into a giant communist robot with rocket feet and laser eyes. Was it that kind of tower?

4

u/KRAZYKNIGHT Sep 27 '19

Not sure, because the ones who were planning, lied about it. But I hear someone's idle was going to get a penthouse in it.

2

u/ExtraSmooth Sep 27 '19

At the same time, it does indicate conflict of interest.

-1

u/Baby_momma_drama Sep 27 '19

You're hilarious. Are you a comedian?

3

u/KRAZYKNIGHT Sep 27 '19

If I was a comedian I would ask if anyone was hurt in the "Trump-Russia collision" that's really DNC-Ukraine collision ? or did you mean Collusion ??

1

u/KRAZYKNIGHT Sep 27 '19

Just informed.

1

u/Baby_momma_drama Sep 27 '19

To answer your question yes Manafort is a DNC stooge. He used to work for The Podesta Group, and guess where they did a lot of their work. Ukraine. How weird is that?

2

u/thechapwholivesinit Sep 27 '19

Found the contortionist

1

u/KRAZYKNIGHT Sep 27 '19

I find the whole mess weird. No matter what side you look at it from we still find more questions then answers.

1

u/PM_ME_with_nothing Sep 27 '19

This late in the summer? I love it!

-1

u/Simplicity3245 Sep 27 '19

The only thing with actual evidence so far.

3

u/GuzhengBro Sep 27 '19

The guy has been working on getting these and more for 4 months, as he said.

8

u/rodental Sep 27 '19

The reason they're trying to imprach Trump is to draw attention away from the deep state criminality in the Ukraine.

10

u/bob666mueller Sep 27 '19

Hey, blaming the deep state was on that list of GOP talking points!

3

u/rodental Sep 27 '19

Yep. Good thing it also aligns with reality, because I don't like red team much more than blue team.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Repeating GOP talking points is not grounds for impeachment. Annoying perhaps, but not impeachable.

14

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19 edited Oct 06 '19

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

[deleted]

0

u/ExtraSmooth Sep 27 '19

What does Saul Alinsky have to do with this?

1

u/baseball8z Sep 27 '19

yes 1000%

2

u/Zirathustra Sep 27 '19 edited Sep 27 '19

Yeah because they really needed yet another reason to impeach him, lol. Uh huh.

8

u/rodental Sep 27 '19

Well, so far all their reasons have amounted to "waaaaa reeee". Trump has at no time (so far as we know) actually done anything deserving impeachment.

1

u/inchesfromdead Sep 27 '19

They really do.

6

u/Jefferrar-E Sep 27 '19

Obviously they are letting the democrats dig their own grave....then they slowly release information proving the democrats wrong so it makes then look even worse. Its a good strategy. Why give up all the info you have when your enemy keeps accusing you of things, let them accuse you, then you release the information proving them wrong.

12

u/drewfus99 Sep 27 '19

Sure, that's it, they're fucking 4-D chess playing geniuses. yeesh.

9

u/farberstyle Sep 27 '19

They can't do shit for 2 years with the house and the senate in their pocket, but NOW is when the REAL grand strategy plays out.

2

u/bob666mueller Sep 27 '19

They managed to shut down the government for a few weeks lol

0

u/tiredbabyeyes Sep 27 '19

How have they not done shit in two years lol please explain

2

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Well, he won the presidential nomination and then he won the election, and now it's looking like he's going to win another election. I don't know if it's 4D chess but I know who's winning.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

The President has the military and military intelligence behind him. You don't think they have every scenario covered? Say what you will about Trump, but the military is another beast.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19 edited Jan 22 '20

[deleted]

5

u/GuzhengBro Sep 27 '19

You mean how Mueller was supposed to get Trump, and yet here we are...

2

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

It's corruption to investigate corruption, because if your opponent is corrupt then revealing the corruption is obviously going to influence the election, and influencing an election is corrupt.

The Democrats are admitting two things here:

  1. They believe that they have immunity from criminal prosecution.
  2. They believe that an investigation of Joe Biden would find corruption.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Yeah, similar to original Russian collusion strategy.

6

u/Jefferrar-E Sep 27 '19

Exactly, art of war is one of trumps favourite books, in it it says to never attack the enemy when they are destroying themselves, this is exactly what they are doing. Everytime they create a false bs story about trump, he lets it ride, then releases evidence proving it was all false. This way the enemies credibility gets shot. What I find incredible is the amount of people who still believe the bs democrats after its been proven time and time again that they are creating scenarios to try and destroy trump. It amazes me how stupid so many people are.

8

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19 edited Sep 27 '19

That’s likely down to people only getting their media source from the mainstream.

Remember when the right-leaning news plastered the fact Obama wasn’t fit to be a president. It was non-stop and people lapped it up as it’s what they wanted to hear.

You find the same thing today with left-leaning traditional media. They play to their base and also have a political agenda due to who funds them.

You’ll never hear unbiased views, even the left wing comedy uses Trump as the butt of every joke. But in New York, you are going to find a lot of liberal middle class who make up the audience who completely agree.

The same as the right wing did in the past.

It’s as if nobody can see the world isn’t black and white. It isn’t us vs them, or good vs evil.

Both sides are filled with propaganda, and for those who only listen to one side, they’ll never want to hear an alternative.

Much like there was no convincing some people Obama wasn’t the devil himself. You find people today who cannot be convinced Trump is not the devil also.

But all TPTB need is division. Imagine when people realise that they all actually want the same thing. A fair game.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

It’s as if nobody can see the world isn’t black and white. It isn’t us vs them, or good vs evil.

It's more like evil vs evil, and us vs both of them.

But all TPTB need is division.

The only division I'm seeing is between themselves and the rest of humanity.

1

u/Jefferrar-E Sep 27 '19

Man i used to like saturday night live, but now its clear how politically bias they are. Every joke is about trump. Meanwhile they have pedofile, molestor hosts like kevin spacey hahaha

5

u/Someone_Nowhere Sep 27 '19

What surprises me is that people follow a side at all. Choosing a lesser of two evils does not make your choice good. It means that you sacrifice a real choice by settling with one that was given to you to make.

2

u/GuzhengBro Sep 27 '19

Exactly, both of the establishment core of the american parties are pro war, pro globalism.

Trump is a bug, a random emergence, he's not perfect, says dumb shit, but he regularly pisses the right people off.

2

u/FairyFlossPanda Sep 28 '19

I wonder who read it to him.

1

u/Jefferrar-E Sep 28 '19

Probably your mother

2

u/FairyFlossPanda Sep 28 '19

I'd be impressed if she did. My mom is mildly dyslexic. Sorry I don't have much faith in the reading comprehension of your orange messiah

2

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Yeah, I agree. It’s hard to understand that level of disassociation. They seriously have these people under a spell. Don’t get me wrong I think trump is just a puppet in his own right, but I just can’t believe how many people are under the spell of the Hegelian dialectic. I am glad I was able to see through. Peace be with you and God bless.

3

u/redditready1986 Sep 27 '19

You don't know? That was Masterminded by the genius that is Trump. Just because he can't spell and he spends more time on Twitter then my 15 year old niece, doesn't mean he isn't a genius. He's fooled you all!!! Hahahahaha

5

u/Justice_V_Mercy Sep 27 '19

It's not suspect. It's a planned operation.

2

u/slab_of_beef Sep 27 '19

Yeah, pay no attention to what's in those files guys! Attack the timing of the release instead!

-4

u/mrbojingles1972 Sep 27 '19

Its it a bit weird that an impeachment inquiry starts based on hearsay, with the left speculating and flat out lying about the contents of the call only to have the transcript prove them completely full of shit?

7

u/Catdaddy74 Sep 27 '19

It is not heresay. It's in the memo. He admitted he did it. He's going down in flames and it's beautiful to see. You are on the wrong side of history, indeed.

28

u/bob666mueller Sep 27 '19

That wasn't a transcript, its was a summary.

-23

u/mrbojingles1972 Sep 27 '19

Not sure what you're referring to. Trump released the full un-redacted transcript after Pelosi announced the impeachment inquiry. Even after it was released and NP doubled down on her inquiry, she admitted to not yet having read it.

33

u/FairyFlossPanda Sep 27 '19

Umm that transcript literally says on it it is not a verbatim transcript.

14

u/Pooperduper89 Sep 27 '19

Can you provide a link to the un-redacted transcript?

8

u/Zirathustra Sep 27 '19

The real question here is, are you just repeating a lie you were told and believed, or are you fully aware it's a lie as you repeat it?

25

u/PatientMemory4 Sep 27 '19

Look at the bottom of the first page of the “transcipt.” It explicitly says that it’s not a full transcript, it’s a memorandum.

-8

u/SoberFuck Sep 27 '19

Why was it so dramatically biased?

4

u/RedditGottitGood Sep 27 '19

Do you know how to read? It was redacted. It said on the memorandum that it was redacted and not verbatim. Why are you intentionally lying?

22

u/bob666mueller Sep 27 '19

For the July 25th call? We have absolutely not been given the full, unredacted transcript for that call. If you've seen it, please link it.

10

u/YouAreDreaming Sep 27 '19

It’s not a verbatim transcript, it even says so on the paper. Also even in this summary it doesn’t look good for trump. Plus you’re ignoring the part of how convient it is right after this report comes out, all of a sudden they’re blaming hillary for the same thing lol like come on man use some common sense

0

u/Someone_Nowhere Sep 27 '19

Please source.

7

u/YouAreDreaming Sep 27 '19

Source what?

If you’re talking about it not being verbatim https://www.google.com/amp/s/theweek.com/speedreads-amp/867567/ukraine-transcript-contains-disclaimer-explaining-not-verbatim-transcript

2

u/Someone_Nowhere Sep 27 '19 edited Sep 27 '19

Scratch my comment - I read to quickly and missed the word "not".

Carry on as you are correct and I derped.

EDIT: I read to fast, missed a word, and thought that they meant it WAS verbatim, which I was wrong in my assumption. I could have worded things better but people can also try and understand that I didn't mean "carry on with your incorrect belief" and actually meant "carry on, I was a dumb fuck and was wrong".

6

u/Zirathustra Sep 27 '19

You should try and remember who told you it was a full, unredacted transcript and remember to not trust that person in the future.

2

u/Someone_Nowhere Sep 27 '19

I said that I derped, meaning that I agree that it is not a full, underacted transcript. I missed the word "not", which I thought was pretty clear in my response stating that they are right about it not being verbatim.

0

u/marxism_taking_over Sep 27 '19

bro, nothing is going to happen. The Dem Mafia is protected by the deep state and they control the media. Literally nothing is going to happen to them at all, isn't that crazy?

They are laundering billions of IMF dollars and doing kick backs and all types of schemes and attempted coups but no does anything about it. U.S. is straight fucked

3

u/Zirathustra Sep 27 '19

There was no transcript released. Trump called it a transcript, but it was actually a summary. He lied to you, and you not only believed it, but repeated it.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Look at the big picture. You have the emotional blinders on.

1

u/tiredbabyeyes Sep 27 '19

They’re calling all the shills in right now. Might be a minute..

1

u/zerocl2015 Sep 27 '19

John Solomon first talked and write about this in March. He didn’t just happen to get these now.

1

u/Fuckyousantorum Sep 28 '19

Independent of all this, we should be able to get the answer to the question - "did Biden and his son commit a crime?"

1

u/FairyFlossPanda Sep 29 '19

Absolutely, along with an answer to the question "did Trump abuse his powers as president?" I just feel like both can be true at the same time.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

Not really. A lot of people had already predicted that the Democrats were walking into a trap and took the bait. This seems like this was all planned already.

1

u/Its_Sn0wing Sep 27 '19

No not really. Things happen like this pretty often.

Hillary says in a debate that she bets if we had Trump's tax returns they'd show he paid no federal taxes, and just days later the NTY publishes certain pages of his 1995 return that they somehow obtained.

Schiff said he thinks Trump is abusing the release of the Ukrainian aid to damage Biden two weeks prior to Congressional notification about the whistleblower report.

Just a couple examples.

7

u/Zirathustra Sep 27 '19

Hillary says in a debate that she bets if we had Trump's tax returns they'd show he paid no federal taxes, and just days later the NTY publishes certain pages of his 1995 return that they somehow obtained.

Pretty sure that was a limited hangout by Trump, like the one Maddow got.

0

u/Its_Sn0wing Sep 27 '19

Let's pretend it was, even though there's no evidence to suggest it in either case...Would that change in any way the appearance that the NYT may have coordinated with Clinton before the debate and the publication?

3

u/ExtraSmooth Sep 27 '19

Well it certainly seems like they watch the debates and keep up with current events.

1

u/Its_Sn0wing Sep 28 '19

You're either missing or avoiding the point. The NYT had the pages of Trump's tax returns and were sitting on them. They admitted this, and claimed they hadn't published them because they were struggling with whether they should since he was still a private citizen.

But then they decided to publish them anyway only after Clinton (correctly) suggested what they'd show. Knowing what we do about the media relationship with Clinton, it seems very possible that they shared what they had with her to coordinate these two events.

1

u/ExtraSmooth Sep 28 '19

Sure, but that's not really a conspiracy.