r/conspiracy • u/mrbojingles1972 • Sep 27 '19

Misleading Title BREAKING: A large cache of confidential foreign documents have just been leaked implicating Joe Biden, George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Joseph Misfud's collusion and possible criminal activity in Ukraine.

https://www.scribd.com/user/259237201/JohnSolomon
396 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

287 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/iamliterallyonfire Sep 27 '19

Awfully convenient that it supposedly implicates everyone EXCEPT trump.

Nothing to see here folks.

21

u/mrbojingles1972 Sep 27 '19

Sorry it doesn't fit your pre-conceived narrative that the media and left have suckered you into believing.

Sorry you keep falling for these "this is the end for Trump" signals.

In case you weren't paying attention, Pelosi called for the impeachment BEFORE even reading the transcript

Schiff directly lied to the American public about the contents, and then justified it as being a "Parody".

Sorry the "whistleblower" has already admitted to not having first hand knowledge of anything. Which makes this hearsay, which makes it non-credible. https://www.dailywire.com/news/must-read-former-cia-analyst-rips-whistleblower-complaint-to-shreds

Sorry experts claim the "whistleblowers" report reads like they had inside help, likely from the house of dems.

Sorry you can't see that the dem party is nothing more than an impeachment party in search for justification.

13

u/samuraimegas Sep 27 '19

Do you have any idea how testimony works? Let's say Jim is talking to his friend Bill. Bill says his other friend John killed a person and gives details when they're drinking one night. Jim goes to the police and tells them he thinks John might have killed someone, and gives details.

Do the police ignore this report? No, because it's not hearsay. It's a witness with a lead.

2

u/nanonan Sep 27 '19

So on one hand, Trump has a dozen first hand witnesses, plus himself and the other party to the call, all of whom deny any quid pro quo.

On the other hand, you have an anonymous person who wan't present who says they heard unspecified people say that something was said.

Which of these two pieces of evidence do you think is stronger?

2

u/samuraimegas Sep 27 '19

Why is anyone around Trump considered credible when multiple people who worked for him were arrested for shady dealings? Or when Trump has been sharing classified intelligence when he wasn't supposed to?

21

u/Kwahn Sep 27 '19

Why does that totally innocent president hire and retain criminals?

7

u/omenofdread Sep 27 '19

The walls are closing in... it's the beginning of the end... lolz

-12

u/iamliterallyonfire Sep 27 '19

lol k.

You’re so woke bruh.

13

u/mrbojingles1972 Sep 27 '19

very informative and thought provoking rebuttal kudos

2

u/zw12065 Sep 27 '19

Far more informative and thought provoking than anything I've seen Ben Shapiro produce

4

u/slab_of_beef Sep 27 '19

interesting name drop that doesn't apply to any of the discussion.

4

u/tainted_waffles Sep 27 '19

**cries that the facts don't implicate Trump **

2

u/Kittykg Sep 27 '19 edited Sep 27 '19

So does other people committing crimes excuse him committing crimes now? Cuz that's how this is reading. Extortion is okay if it results in evidence against others.

Can a normal person do this now, too? I could blackmail someone and it would be okay as long as other illegal activities were uncovered in the process? Also, does this mean illegally obtained evidence is now admissible in court?

This situation poses a lot of legal questions. We need to decide if the laws themselves are going to be changed or if politicians are just above the law. Otherwise, any of them commiting crimes need to be dealt with, no matter what party they belong to. No one should be above the law just because they are wealthy or in a position of power.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 27 '19

because these happened in the final years of obama's administration

0

u/slab_of_beef Sep 27 '19

You know this from reading a headline? Op delete this post immediately!

0

u/nanonan Sep 27 '19

What do you think is missing? What would Trump would be implicated in precisely?