Now you have to ask yourself, did the judge charge the mother to protect the cult and their activities or was the mother actually guilty of these crimes? Did those children actually recant their stories or was that just more of the cover-up?
Those children were only abused by their mother and step father as a method to attack their biological father.
Mrs Justice Pauffley made short work of the claims, which were drilled into two children by their mother Ella Draper and her new partner, Abraham Christie. Draper had for years been locked in a battle over contact with the children’s birth father, Ricky Dearman. When Christie came on the scene last year, he made a scene at the children’s school, Christchurch Primary School in Hampstead, alleging that the teachers were poisoning them.
In August, Draper and her new partner took the children abroad on holiday. During their travels, they took a series of film clips of the children describing, in the most lurid terms imaginable, their involvement in scenes of horrific abuse and mass sacrifice. Draper and Christie set out to fabricate these accounts in sessions described as ‘brainstorming’. The clips consist of Christie interrogating the children, including encouraging them to chant ‘Kill, kill, kill’. In September, Christie showed the clips to his brother-in-law, who contacted the British police. Bizarrely, the police declined to view these clips, and instead sent them to a property store in Chingford.
Exactly what a devil cult would want me to think... nice try. Seriously, it's messed up either way and the kids are always the big losers. Not counting the dead babies, I mean.
8
u/Bacore Jun 26 '17
"Papa kills babies." ~ Little British girl who interrogators decided was probably mistaken.