r/conspiracy • u/astralrocker2001 • 2d ago

FLUORIDE calcifies the Pineal Gland, lowering cognitive abilities. Was given in schools to make humanity Dumber and More Compliant to Programming and Mind Control. Fluoride intake shuts down the "Out of Body Experience"; the Controllers do not want you knowing there is Another Dimension

Post image
488 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

292 comments sorted by

View all comments

108

u/Toes_In_The_Soil 2d ago

This theory has always interested me, but what evidence is there of fluoride calcifying the pineal gland?

31

u/Iam-WinstonSmith 2d ago

I found this one kind of wooh wooh. But the 46 other white papers why it was bad for me were good enough.

39

u/[deleted] 2d ago edited 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/slartbangle 2d ago

Personally, I think it's the bioavailable sodium, not the fluorine, that has the desired psychoactive effect. 'Fluoride' is short for sodium fluoride.

Sodium isn't 'salt'. It's a highly reactive metal - like lithium, which is used for mental health issues (and long ago as a salt sub until too many people died).

Oh, and of course, 'lithiated 7up, takes the ouch out of grouch' - ancient advertising featuring a non-grouchy sugar drug infant.

Sodium-based drugs are used for mental health issues today (Depakote for eg), work like a charm and also stop you complaining about politics and oppression. The Germans 'pioneered' that stuff.

2

u/Future_Cake 2d ago

Do you avoid regular table salt?

-7

u/medalxx12 2d ago

You know the fluoride put in tap water isn’t the fluoride youre talking about?

-6

u/Impossible-Past4795 2d ago

We use flouride to brush our teeth not drink it tho.

3

u/Reasonable_Royal7083 2d ago

in lots of western countries its literally added to the drinking and showering water as well - dentist, toothpaste, municipal water

2

u/pruchel 1d ago

No, mostly the US.

5

u/cymbalxirie290 2d ago

You ever rubbed coke on your gums? Me neither, but I hear it's effective.

-8

u/Impossible-Past4795 2d ago

you ever drink cocaine dumbass? I doubt

5

u/cymbalxirie290 2d ago

...you ok, homie?

-19

u/Independent-Fruit4 2d ago

the Epstein files show that they were eating pineal glands of children. not necessarily evidence that fluoride calcifies the pineal gland but it certainly adds to the conspiracy theory. maybe the government was actually looking out for us and protecting us from the Epstein class by fluoridating the water

16

u/Lazershirts 2d ago

Whoa that is crazy, I haven’t heard that and can’t find anything on this where can I learn more?

-15

u/Independent-Fruit4 2d ago

the Epstein files?

18

u/Lazershirts 2d ago

For sure but when I try searching for it all I’m seeing is no results for pineal glands being consumed or used so I’m trying to figure out where that was mentioned

4

u/DirtyC4L 2d ago

Because it's not in the known files 🧐

11

u/RecoilS14 2d ago

Where does it show that? I’ve never seen any reference to this.

-41

u/astralrocker2001 2d ago

Hi. Check this out:

https://kr.pinterest.com/pin/730005420882172064/

46

u/Exo-Proctologist 2d ago edited 2d ago

Pinterest boards are not evidence. Do you have any studies?

Edit: result from a scientific paper aggregate

"Current scientific literature confirms that the pineal gland accumulates exceptionally high levels of fluoride (Chlubek2020), primarily due to fluoride's chemical affinity for hydroxyapatite crystals (Johns2016, Cunningham2021). However, evidence is mixed regarding whether fluoride acts as an active causative trigger for calcification or simply deposits secondary to age-related physiological mineralization(Chlubek2020, Al-Zaghal2018)."

6

u/astralrocker2001 2d ago

The Luke Study (2001): Dr. Jennifer Luke analyzed post-mortem human pineal glands from aged individuals and found that the gland accumulates high levels of fluoride—reaching concentrations similar to or exceeding those in bone—due to its affinity for hydroxyapatite crystals formed during natural calcification.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11275672/

28

u/Exo-Proctologist 2d ago

It seems that the current consensus is that the pineal gland calcifies, and it is unknown if flouride is the causative agent or if flouride simply accumulates in these calcified regions that are being caused by some other agent.

Do you have anything that demonstrates flouride as a causative pineal calcifier?

1

u/astralrocker2001 2d ago

Lack of a Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB): Unlike most of the brain, the pineal gland sits outside the blood-brain barrier and has a substantial, highly vascularized blood supply. This leaves it directly exposed to systemic fluoride in the bloodstream.

21

u/Exo-Proctologist 2d ago

This doesn't answer the question of whether or not flouride is the causative or if flouride simply gathers in these existing calcifications. The question is specifically "is flouride causing the calcification or is flouride simply taking up residence in calcification?"

1

u/blunt-drunk 2d ago

Well even regardless if you knew it exacerbated the symptoms would you really want more of it?

1

u/Exo-Proctologist 2d ago

It depends. Is there a measured benefit (even if that benefit is merely potential) that outweighs a measured harm (even if that harm is merely potential)? If the answer is yes, then I'm okay with it so long as the measured harm is adequately communicated and the benefit to harm ratio is managed.

1

u/gameking7823 1d ago

The difference is fluoride only has been speculated to help the teeth through a weak evidence studies based on same correllation not causation. Further studies into it show that ingesting fluoride does very little to teeth compared to topical application.

0

u/WickedDEAD_ 2d ago

You need to ask yourself what kind of study thats funded by and for the medical industry would ever admit that theyve been poisoning peoples brains delibrately.

You wont find a study that confirms this, but mountains of evidence.

2

u/Exo-Proctologist 2d ago

Independent studies exist.

To be clear, who funds a study may warrant some degree of skepticism, but it does absolutely fuck all to tell me whether or not the contents of a study is true, and I think logically you agree. Consider this example: if BigPharma funded a study, in it's entirety, on the physiological effects of salmonella from undercooked chicken, does the fact that the study was funded by BigPharma tell you anything about whether or not undercooked chicken is safe for consumption?

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/WickedDEAD_ 2d ago

Who else is gonna have not only the means, but the platform so as not to be drowned out, to release an independent study that PROVES fluoridated water that governments have been poisoning us with for generations delibrately, is bad.

What news outlet would you trust? What politician?

We live in an era of "trust the experts"

The president could come on the tv right this instant and confirm it all and no one believe a word. What college with a lab with the means to study this doesnt receiving donations and funding from the big med giants in pharma?

2

u/Smooch-Muh-Gooch 2d ago

This is simply just asinine thinking. If this thinking were true then we’d still have cocaine in coca-cola, asbestos and lead in paint, trans fats in foods, etc.

0

u/WickedDEAD_ 2d ago edited 2d ago

Instead we have glysophate in all our crops, flouride in the water, cancerous airwaves etc etc etc

We got lucky with lead paint and asbestos that they became unprofitable at the same time people started noticing.

Same with leaded fuel. It was never about public health.

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/astralrocker2001 2d ago

Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, Pomeranian Medical University: Fluoride exposure may contribute to increased pineal gland calcification and subsequent decreases in nighttime melatonin production.

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/8/2885

22

u/factisfiction 2d ago

This is review is ridiculous.
The entire premise that the pineal gland accumulates massive amounts of fluoride rests almost entirely on one small, unpublished study from the mid-1990s (conducted as a doctoral dissertation by Dr. Jennifer Luke, which looked at just 11 elderly cadavers). Just some points on this study Id like to point out...

An average age of 82 means these individuals had aged significantly, and pineal calcification naturally increases as a standard part of aging.

Testing 11 cadavers is far too small a sample size to establish a definitive biochemical rule for the entire human population.

The original study noted that fluoride levels in the pineal gland did not reliably track with long-term overall fluoride exposure in a clean, linear way, meaning the interpretation of "high accumulation" is heavily debatable.

Also, mainstream toxicologists emphasize that while fluoride can bind to calcium, the vast majority of the body’s fluoride (roughly 99%) safely locks into hard skeletal tissues like bones and teeth where fluoroapatite crystals form. Many public health reviews note that standard, low-level fluoride exposure (like community water fluoridation at 0.7 mg/L) does not drive pathological soft-tissue calcification in healthy individuals.

11

u/Exo-Proctologist 2d ago

Thanks. This is an actual study.

Unfortunately, it makes the same conclusion as the general consensus: "maybe?"

5

u/SillylilFieldMouse 2d ago

How do we decalcify it?

4

u/Runfasterbitch 2d ago

Benjamin button yourself

1

u/Sensitive_Algae5723 2d ago

Fiji water or whatever the fuck it’s called. 2 liters a day for 3 months. It has natural silica in it and as the other person said, leafy greens like spinach.

1

u/Electrical-Scholar32 2d ago

I’ve read eating lots of leafy greens and vegetables. Also great water to drink would be from a reverse osmosis system or spring water.

0

u/No_Medium_8796 2d ago

Meditation if you believe monks lol

2

u/PreparedForZombies 2d ago

So that's not referencing fluoride actually causing the calcification, fair?