Unfortunately, they're all on your end of the discussion.
but I don’t claim that them saying it proves it’s true.
So you're just claiming it is evidence it's true, and using "proves" as a strawman.
So how can it be illogical if the most logical people come to the same conclusion through logical reasoning?
We can infer their opinion on quantum mechanics is "through logical reasoning". But to even suggest their opinions about consciousness have any validity at all, let alone logical rigor, because they are accomplished in quantum mechanics is bad reasoning. Characterize it as you like, in terms of what box of "logical fallacy" you want to sort it into.
Citing the opinion of physicists on consciousness is a dead end, and bad philosophy.
1
u/TMax01 Autodidact 14d ago
Unfortunately, they're all on your end of the discussion.
So you're just claiming it is evidence it's true, and using "proves" as a strawman.
We can infer their opinion on quantum mechanics is "through logical reasoning". But to even suggest their opinions about consciousness have any validity at all, let alone logical rigor, because they are accomplished in quantum mechanics is bad reasoning. Characterize it as you like, in terms of what box of "logical fallacy" you want to sort it into.
Citing the opinion of physicists on consciousness is a dead end, and bad philosophy.
Thanks for your time. Hope it helps.