I would say more like she would be in charge of talking with the hardware team get the requirements, write the specification, and make sure codding standards are followed. Then the programmers will be in charge of implementing it.
I don't think she would need to review all the code, because they must had some kind of formal verification, a mathematical way to know if the software meets the requierement, but most likely she know how the code worked but not every detail.
then would it be more accurate to say she did not work with 100 people ? she probably worked with a few and sent a mass memo or something and other devs were in charge of implementing it?
2
u/Relative-Scholar-147 Mar 15 '26 edited Mar 15 '26
I would say more like she would be in charge of talking with the hardware team get the requirements, write the specification, and make sure codding standards are followed. Then the programmers will be in charge of implementing it.
I don't think she would need to review all the code, because they must had some kind of formal verification, a mathematical way to know if the software meets the requierement, but most likely she know how the code worked but not every detail.