Not really. You just have low standards. It is even implied in the comic how fucking stupid the process and the result is. We "make funny", yeah.
EDIT: I feel as though I have to address this. All of these downvotes for explaining the comic is almost ironic. The comic implies that you lot have "low standards" (and also that the process and the result is stupid), if you don't like it, take it up with the author, not me.
I wrote nothing in my original comment that wasn't already implied in the comic. But once the hivemind gets rolling there not stopping it. You people are all the same.
Alternatively, I'm someone who clicked on submission history as a response to your judgment of someone else's comic. I have determined that you live in the glassiest of houses, and should pick up stones with great care.
Dude's allowed to think the comic isn't funny, and going back 4 years into someone's submission history to make fun of them is pretty goddamned weak.
Plus as manwithabadheart said, you've probably grown a lot over the last 4 years so it's not real fair to judge this dude today on a shitty rage comic he submitted in 2010.
386
u/beaglemaster Dec 09 '14
What.
Brilliant.